[Vo]:Robots will replace priests

[Axil Axil]

No profession is protected from automation.These robot priests are
programmed for a high-tech funeral

Instead of employing a live monk, a robot could be a major cost-saver - the
average cost of a funeral in Japan can top $25,000, with human priests
costing $2,175, The Guardian reports, citing 2008 data from Japan's
Consumer Association. Nissei Eco, the company showing off the funeral-bot
hopes to rent Pepper out for just $450 per funeral.

Read more at:
https://phys.org/news/2017-08-robot-priests-high-tech-funeral.html#jCp

Re: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

[mixent]

In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:15:30 -0400:
Hi,

Actually a half life of 14 billion years sounds like it's about the right order
of magnitude for the power output of the Sun, given the number of particles that
are present.
(Note that most of the energy comes from the follow on reactions which are near
"instantaneous" by comparison.)

>Two particles are created, the positron and the neutrino. Is it possible
>that the excess energy (0.42MeV) from this first stage goes into into
>producing  movement(aka kinetic energy) in one and/or both of those new
>particles?
>
>By the way, PP fusion inside the core of the Sun has a cross section of 14
>billion years.  In other works it can't happen as a source of energy, even
>inside the core of the Sun. It stands to reason that PP fusion cannot
>produce the energy seen in the NI/H reaction. Therefore, LENR is not a
>fusion reaction.
>
>On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Nigel Dyer  wrote:
>
>> In the text of the wikipedia page about proton proton fusion
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction
>>
>> It says that in the first stage, when two protons fuse, a gamma ray proton
>> is produced.  However this is not shown in the diagram, or in anyone elses
>> diagram, or in anyone else's text.   Is the wikipedia page incorrect.   If
>> no gamma ray photon is produced then where does the excess energy (0.42MeV)
>> from this first stage go?
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
>>
>>
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Re: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

[mixent]

In reply to  Nigel Dyer's message of Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:22:51 +0100:
Hi,
>In the text of the wikipedia page about proton proton fusion
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction
>
>It says that in the first stage, when two protons fuse, a gamma ray 
>proton is produced.  

That's because you are not reading it correctly. The gamma ray photons mentioned
come from the ensuing positron-electron annihilation, not from the initial
reaction.
[snip]
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Re: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

[Axil Axil]

Two particles are created, the positron and the neutrino. Is it possible
that the excess energy (0.42MeV) from this first stage goes into into
producing  movement(aka kinetic energy) in one and/or both of those new
particles?

By the way, PP fusion inside the core of the Sun has a cross section of 14
billion years.  In other works it can't happen as a source of energy, even
inside the core of the Sun. It stands to reason that PP fusion cannot
produce the energy seen in the NI/H reaction. Therefore, LENR is not a
fusion reaction.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Nigel Dyer  wrote:

> In the text of the wikipedia page about proton proton fusion
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction
>
> It says that in the first stage, when two protons fuse, a gamma ray proton
> is produced.  However this is not shown in the diagram, or in anyone elses
> diagram, or in anyone else's text.   Is the wikipedia page incorrect.   If
> no gamma ray photon is produced then where does the excess energy (0.42MeV)
> from this first stage go?
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?

[Axil Axil]

The latest theory is that entanglement keeps spacetime together.
Entanglement is fundamental.  All other aspects of spacetime come from
entanglement. In order for entanglement to exist, two things must be
entangled. When a particle is created, it must be paired with an
antiparticle so that a connection between them is formed...entanglement
must be created.  All particle pairs must be connected by a wormhole. The
wormhole is the mechanism that keeps spacetime together.

We can manipulate the forces of nature, weak, strong, EMF, gravity by using
entanglement, since those "fundamental" forces come from(aka emerge)
entanglement and all the properties of spacetime emerge from entanglement.

This idea has just come to Leonard Susskind and is explained here:

Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM
Leonard Susskind

(Submitted on 10 Aug 2017)

https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03040

Also, here is how wormholes work

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8



On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:12 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint 
wrote:

> Vorts,
>
>
>
> Perusing some physics news, and thought you’d b interested in this:
>
>
>
> http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841935/Why-is-there-a-
> universe-quarks-quantum-physics-big-bang-nothing-god
>
>
>
> Some excerpts:
>
> The new findings seem to break the classical physics law of the
> Conservation of Energy – that energy can neither be created nor destroyed –
> showing that new energy can appear within a closed system from nowhere.
>
>
>
> These Quantum physicists first theorised, then proved, that particles
> simply pop into existence, usually in pairs, from absolutely nowhere.
>
>
>
> Nobel prize winner Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of
> Technology, who specialises is quantum chromodynamics, the theory that
> describes how quarks behave deep within atomic nuclei, has found that the
> universe simply doesn’t like a state of nothingness.
>
>
>
> -mark iverson
>
>
>

[Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

[Nigel Dyer]

In the text of the wikipedia page about proton proton fusion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction

It says that in the first stage, when two protons fuse, a gamma ray 
proton is produced.  However this is not shown in the diagram, or in 
anyone elses diagram, or in anyone else's text.   Is the wikipedia page 
incorrect.   If no gamma ray photon is produced then where does the 
excess energy (0.42MeV) from this first stage go?


Nigel

[Vo]:Why pairs?

[MarkI-ZeroPoint]

Vorts,

 

Perusing some physics news, and thought you'd b interested in this:

 

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841935/Why-is-there-a-universe-quarks-
quantum-physics-big-bang-nothing-god

 

Some excerpts:



The new findings seem to break the classical physics law of the Conservation
of Energy - that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - showing that
new energy can appear within a closed system from nowhere.

 

These Quantum physicists first theorised, then proved, that particles simply
pop into existence, usually in pairs, from absolutely nowhere.

 

Nobel prize winner Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, who specialises is quantum chromodynamics, the theory that
describes how quarks behave deep within atomic nuclei, has found that the
universe simply doesn't like a state of nothingness.

 

-mark iverson