Wylie asks if I have an interesting viewpoint on the
subject. No, just the ongoing dialogue mentioned with a since passed
geologist friend.
Your interest leads me to believe that you have some views.
Please feel free to express them here.
Perhaps the first recorded discussion on the mat
Interesting point from M.C. :
> With all this talk about ethanol and hydrogen, let me take
note of the water
> bath calorimetry experiments of Mills which showed a heat
release from
> hydrogen 100 times greater than by combustion of the same
amount of
> hydrogen.
The only obvious drawback to the
A Google query of "Scott Ritter" "John Kerry" produces quite a surprising
(to me anyway) history of Ritter's criticism of John Kerry (in addition to
Ritter's more well known criticism of the Bush administration) over issues
of weapons of mass destruction, and long before Kerry was a presidential
ca
Hell is thawing
At 05:53 PM 10/8/2004 -0400, you wrote:
I am sorry to see this news:
http://www.nature.com/news/2004/041004/full/041004-19.html
Here is something amazing though; Nature actually deigns to mention CF is
semi-partly-conceivably positive manner. The rest of the article is bunk,
inclu
I am sorry to see this news:
http://www.nature.com/news/2004/041004/full/041004-19.html
Here is something amazing though; Nature actually deigns to mention CF is
semi-partly-conceivably positive manner. The rest of the article is bunk,
including Nature's version of its own role in this travesty.
Johnson, Steven wrote:
CNN.COM has come out with an article about the sponsors of the X prize.
Did you catch the news on Bigelow's $50M prize for a vehicle to service
his "hotel"?
http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0409/27bigelow/
UFO enthusiasts might remember Robert for his NIDS:
http://www.nidsci
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Oct 04 Montreal, CA
I find daily jogging
helps.
TIMBER!
CNN.COM has come out with an article about the sponsors of the X prize. They
are planning new prizes to help spur additional innovation in space
exploration in the private sector.
Good idea. It's worked in the past.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/10/08/ansari.xprize.ap/index.html
We need spo
Blank- Original Message -
From: RC Macaulay
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 6:57 AM
Subject: Episode 2: Joy of discussion
Answer for Wyley..I came from the old days when dinasaurs...
Sorry for the apparent misunderstanding. I thought you might have an
interesting viewpoint on the argument o
Jones Beene wrote:
I think one of the reasons you threw this pile of disinfo
out to foul the air was to show the incompetence of "Energy
Consultants" in the UK... am I right?
I wouldn't tend to single out the UK. :-)
Ackshully, I stumbled across it while looking at organic methods of
hydrogen pro
With all this talk about ethanol and hydrogen, let me take note of the water
bath calorimetry experiments of Mills which showed a heat release from
hydrogen 100 times greater than by combustion of the same amount of
hydrogen.
Reports on the experiments can be found at www.blacklightpower.com. The
> [Original Message]
> From: What's New <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Akira Kawasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10/8/2004 8:58:33 AM
Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, October 08, 2004
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Oct 04 Montreal, CA
1. OUTER LIMITS: PERIMETER INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL P
Terry Blanton wrote:
> > they forgot that hydrogen transport is roughly three times more
> > efficient than conventional oil, so they need only 18 MTOE
>
>
> Is this based on mass alone? Does it include extra transport loses (eg
> hydrogen loses in metal pipelines)?
Hydrogen pipeline losses are mo
OK, some of you guys may remember me from 5-6 years ago. I've been lurking the past couple months just reading the posts online, but decided it was time to stick my oar in.
Jed, I'm currently an architectural CAD drafter at a building company and would be happy to help you out. Curious to say t
Terry,
> This article:
>
> http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage1256.html
>
> claims it would take 100 new nuclear plants to create
enough hydrogen by
> cracking water.
I think one of the reasons you threw this pile of disinfo
out to foul the air was to show the incompetence of "Energy
Consulta
Jed Rothwell wrote:
they forgot that hydrogen transport is roughly three times more
efficient than conventional oil, so they need only 18 MTOE
Is this based on mass alone? Does it include extra transport loses (eg
hydrogen loses in metal pipelines)?
Terry
(watching my 50th birthday mylar ballo
>From: Jed Rothwell
>Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 11:48 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: 100 New British Nukes
>
>
>Also, I forgot to mention, the author's plan to use nuclear
>power generators to make electricity, to perform electrolysis,
>to produce hydrogen, is preposterous. Methods usi
Also, I forgot to mention, the author's plan to use nuclear power
generators to make electricity, to perform electrolysis, to produce
hydrogen, is preposterous. Methods using nuclear heat directly to split
hydrogen (pyrolysis) would be far more efficient. In other words, you only
need 15 or 20
Terry Blanton writes:
> I seem to recall that someone calculated that the entire island would
> have to be planted in corn to fuel British automobiles with ethanol.
I do not know about the U.K., but the U.S. would require about twice as
much land as we possess to grow enough biomass to replace all
I seem to recall that someone calculated that the entire island would
have to be planted in corn to fuel British automobiles with ethanol.
This article:
http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage1256.html
claims it would take 100 new nuclear plants to create enough hydrogen by
cracking water.
Answer for Wyley..I came from the old days when
dinasaurs were made into crude petroleum beneath the earth.. everyone accepted
the fact back then.. well.. err.. that is until I saw the Grand Canyon and read
the plaque provided by the US Park Service that stated it took umpeen million
years f
In response to Richard Macaulay's earlier contention that the earth was expanding:
"My view.. that the continents could not have drifted " apart" since the east and west sideof land masses " fit". The discussion reached a point of maturity with each "cutting the othersome slack" whereas he cou
22 matches
Mail list logo
