Hey Jones.
Given that each of the three helium nuclei (and their electrons) have a magnetic dipole moment
(whether steady-state or oscillating at 10e20 to 10e25 Hz) they should align like compass needles
along the field lines in a strong magnetic field such as that provided by a Current Loop
---BeginMessage---
In a message dated 12/22/2004 8:08:32 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An interesting presentation of String Theory on PBS last night.
Rewarding to see that the "Energy Circle or Disk" Model is in lock-step with it.
OTOH, the establishment wags say that
GR, QM, and Field Unification (DRAFT #4)
SOME BASIC ISSUES WITH RESPECT TO GRAVITONS
In a quantum mechanics (QM) approach to gravity it is assumed that gravity,
like the other forces, is carried by a messenger particle. This messenger
particle is commonly called a graviton. If
At 1:54 AM 12/22/4, thomas malloy wrote:
Horace Heffner posted;
The EM-GK isomorphism of gravimagnetics is complete,
Hum, what does that mean?
An isomorphism is a 1-1 correspondence between two sets that preserve all
operations and relations defined on those sets. When an isomorphism is
GR, QM, and Field Unification (DRAFT #4, Part 3)
GRAVITATIONAL ZPE
Gravitons may be assumed to be entities which isomorphically exist in a set
of dimensions in part independent from their cousins the photons.
Gravitons thus have their own independent but isomorphic constant speed
Can it be so simple that the inertia of the electron is due
to Lenz's law?
http://www.newphys.se/elektromagnum/physics/Jonsson/I=EM.pdf
But even so, this is strictly conservative, no?
Emil Lenz put a definite direction on induced currents when
the magnetic field is changing. In other terms: The
Hi Kyle + Nick.
You both must be correct with respect to the second
order effect on dielectrics being due to an acoustic
pulse; certainly varnishing the windings will only
slightly concentrate the electric fields closer to
the core but will substantially reduced the acoustic
Q of the device.
As
Cold Fusion And The Future, by Jed Rothwell, published
by LENR-CANR.org, December 2004, 186 pages.
This book is not copyright. It is distributed for free at
LENR-CANR.org, here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusiona.pdf
Many free-thinkers (and it is a threatened micro-minority)
Hi Horace.
Yes, this is heading in a direction I like...
Let's go a little further. Considering a QM description
of gravito-kinetics, we can imagine gravitons being
emitted by precessing masses in a manner similar to
photon emission from precessing charged masses. What
we see from experiment is
To each I wish a joyful holiday season and a new year
filled with hopes and dreams.
A special THANK YOU to Horace for posting
Desiderada. I will forward a copy to friends.
Richard
Blank Bkgrd.gif
New ICCF-11 papers uploaded. See:
http://lenr-canr.org/FilesByDate.htm
An improved Acrobat conversion of McKubre's PowerPoint slides uploaded:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/McKubreMCHreviewofex.pdf
This is using SoftScan PDF Create, which Pam Boss recommended.
- Jed
At 2:32 PM 12/22/4, Keith Nagel wrote:
Hi Horace.
Yes, this is heading in a direction I like...
Let's go a little further. Considering a QM description
of gravito-kinetics, we can imagine gravitons being
emitted by precessing masses in a manner similar to
photon emission from precessing charged
--- John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if real, how do you explain the laser beam being
bent?
According to what I read, that is inconclusive at this
point. Further, a gravitational field ale to bend a
light beam is approaching the surface gravity on a
neutron star, thus you won't need
Graviphotons, assuming they exist, may provide an alternate and normally
undetectable path for dissipating energy from energized nuclei, if it is
otherwise forbidden, enabling LENR without detectable signature radiation.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFLIK, GR presupposes that there is no difference between
acceleration and gravity,
This is a false assumption many people make. GR only actually assumes
there is no difference at any given *point*. It is easy to theoretically
distinguish
--- Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you say, I wouldn't expect the
permeability
of the rod to matter much, given the geometry, but
a permeable rod would tend to be drawn in and stay
in the center counter to what is seen.
Also notice upon observing the photos on Jean-Louis'
Horace Heffner Posted;
Graviphotons, assuming they exist, may provide an alternate and normally
undetectable path for dissipating energy from energized nuclei, if it is
otherwise forbidden, enabling LENR without detectable signature radiation.
Ha, I've long speculated that the energy had to be
17 matches
Mail list logo
