Re: FW: WHAT'S NEW Monday, January 03, 2005

2005-01-04 Thread William Beaty
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Akira Kawasaki wrote: UN. Yet, in Dover, PA, a town much like Dayton, TN, the school board voted to require that intelligent design be taught alongside evolution. The school board will lose in court, but we must ask ourselves why science has been so spectacularly

Re: WHAT'S NEW Monday, Jan 03 05

2005-01-04 Thread revtec
It seems that we have come back to Intelligent Design because the universe, as presently described by scientists, is still too small and too young to produce the complexity of a living cell by random processes. If Darwin would have had access to thefindings of molecular biology and

Re: Salty water from Mars?

2005-01-04 Thread FHLew
Don Wiegel wrote: Did you ever wonder why the oceans are filled with salt water instead of fresh? Just where did the salt come from? And is it the same salt you find on a dining room table? Most of the salt in the oceans came from land. Over millions of years, rain, rivers, and streams

Re: WHAT'S NEW Monday, Jan 03 05

2005-01-04 Thread Harry Veeder
Title: Re: WHAT'S NEW Monday, Jan 03 05 Do you have a reference for that quote? Harry revtec at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that we have come back to Intelligent Design because the universe, as presently described by scientists, is still too small and too young to produce the

Re: WHAT'S NEW Monday, Jan 03 05

2005-01-04 Thread Harry Veeder
Personally I do not feel life BEGINS by chance, although the subsequent evolution is plausibly Darwinian. Perhaps an E.T. (not necessarily God) has been 'guiding' the evolution of life on this planet. Anyway, the intelligent design theory is bigger than religion. Harry Grimer at [EMAIL

Re: New old NASA paper

2005-01-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
I'll bet if these folks had run an autoradiograph they would have seen some interesting results. This experiment resembles ones performed by Srinivasan et al. with hydrogen filters around 1989. - Jed

Cheat meat......pest control.....wait!

2005-01-04 Thread Standing Bear
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 15:48, Jed Rothwell wrote: Harry Veeder wrote: Personally I do not feel life BEGINS by chance, although the subsequent evolution is plausibly Darwinian. Perhaps an E.T. (not necessarily God) has been 'guiding' the evolution of life on this planet. I find this

Re: OFF TOPIC Annoying recursive hypothesis!

2005-01-04 Thread Harry Veeder
Title: Re: OFF TOPIC Annoying recursive hypothesis! Creationism still dominates evolutionary theory in one important respect: the notion that life and the universe have a beginning. The universe and life may have no ultimate beginning and no ultimate end. The universe and life may be

Re: OFF TOPIC Annoying recursive hypothesis!

2005-01-04 Thread Harry Veeder
Jed Rothwell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Harry Veeder wrote: Personally I do not feel life BEGINS by chance, although the subsequent evolution is plausibly Darwinian. Perhaps an E.T. (not necessarily God) has been 'guiding' the evolution of life on this planet. I find this

Re: Cheat meat......pest control.....wait!

2005-01-04 Thread FZNIDARSIC
In a message dated 1/4/2005 4:46:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Plus, anyone who thinks evolution is slow (or it does not exist) should learn about the growing crisis in antibiotic resistant diseases. Evolution is not as slow as you may think. I occurs rapidly