RE: Explosive Antimony on Platinum, Cold Fusion in 1855?

2005-03-02 Thread Horace Heffner
At 1:14 AM 3/2/5, Keith Nagel wrote: Hey Horace, You write: NOTE THAT THE DECIMAL POINT IN THE 19.6 CAL IS HARD TO READ IN THE SCAN. Oh come on, it's very clear and if the type face is confusing look a few lines above for the same notation ( specific gravity 5.3 ). Well, that depends on the

Re: Correa, etc.

2005-03-02 Thread Grimer
At 10:05 pm Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Thomas Malloy wrote: snip On a separate note, I just got done reading Confessions of an Economic Hitman. It is an astounding book. I have little doubt that anyone who stands in the way of our oil based economic order could be killed. If you have serious

RE: Explosive Antimony on Platinum, Cold Fusion in 1855?

2005-03-02 Thread Frederick Sparber
This thorough treatment (1919) of Antimony by Chung Yu Wang in Europe, nails down the heat of phase change at "20 to 21 calories" (if I interpret it correctly). This is in conflict with G. Gore's 1858 data where someone must have slipped up on his "19.6 Calorie" figure. This apparent error is

RE: Explosive Antimony on Platinum, Cold Fusion in 1855?

2005-03-02 Thread Horace Heffner
At 6:48 AM 3/2/5, Frederick Sparber wrote: This thorough treatment (1919) of Antimony by Chung Yu Wang in Europe, nails down the heat of phase change at 20 to 21 calories (if I interpret it correctly). This is in conflict with G. Gore's 1858 data where someone must have slipped up on his 19.6

RE: Article about Wikipedia

2005-03-02 Thread John Steck
You must be filtering my messages... 8^) -Original Message- From: John Steck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 2:28 PM To: Vortex Subject: Wikipedia Vorts, My apologies if this isn't new to everyone, but just stumbled across Wikipedia. It's an open source

RE: Article about Wikipedia

2005-03-02 Thread Jed Rothwell
John Steck wrote: You must be filtering my messages... 8^) No, I was aware of that. The URL I listed is an article in Wired magazine about Wikipedia. I have been aware of their cold fusion article for some time, because it has a link to LENR-CANR.org, and I see people visiting from it from time

RE: Article about Wikipedia

2005-03-02 Thread Steven Krivit
You must be filtering my messages, too! g FAIR WARNING: Wikipedia, like Vortex, has its own culture, and exists as a fairly well-defined community along with their own written and unwritten rules. The Wiki cold fusion page appears to be run by people who are for the most part, very different

Re: Explosive Antimony on Platinum, Cold Fusion in 1855?

2005-03-02 Thread Frederick Sparber
Jones Beene wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: 3/2/05 10:26:54 AM Subject: Re: Explosive Antimony on Platinum, Cold Fusion in 1855? Keith et al. It look like from reading the morning mail that Fred may have found better refs with the correct value, which ( using

Re: Article about Wikipedia

2005-03-02 Thread Harry Veeder
Title: Re: Article about Wikipedia You could create your own entry on CF, although it would need a different title. e.g. L.E.N.R. or C.A.N.R. or C.M.N.S. (condensed matter nuclear science) Harry Jed Rothwell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steven Krivit wrote: It might APPEAR as though one

Re: Re: Article about Wikipedia

2005-03-02 Thread orionworks
From: Harry Veeder You could create your own entry on CF, although it would need a different title. e.g. L.E.N.R. or C.A.N.R. or C.M.N.S. (condensed matter nuclear science) I think that's an excellent idea. Wouldn't one say that C.A.N.R., L.E.N.R., and C.M.N.S. are more scientifically

RE: Article about Wikipedia

2005-03-02 Thread Keith Nagel
I second the motion. Your post modern solution is just the ticket in the thicket, Harry. Also: Don't pick fights with the editors, Jed. Just post the new LENR topic and lets see what happens. K. -Original Message- From: Harry Veeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 02,

Re: Big CF breakthrough reported

2005-03-02 Thread Jed Rothwell
Stop the presses. I downloaded the white paper which is mostly white noise -- vapid. It describes the work of Hyunik Yang (Korea) et al. It says: They used resonate harmonic frequencies to expose the nuclei of atoms so they could put the nuclei together to obtain the energy from the fused

Re: Big CF breakthrough reported

2005-03-02 Thread Jed Rothwell
Grimer wrote: I can understand your disgust with the poor standard of instrumentation, etc. Jed, but as far as I'm concerned, it all sounds terribly plausible. Actually, I think it is plausible too. That is why I am disgusted by the instrumentation, and also by the documents on this web site.

Re: CF Expert?

2005-03-02 Thread Steven Krivit
I have his CV - yep, it's Oriani W.R. Whitney Award (1987) winner: Richard Oriani. Bingo. He is indeed an expert in CF. - Jed

Re: Big CF breakthrough reported

2005-03-02 Thread Steven Krivit
Korean patent On http://iesiusa.com/intellectual.html there is a list of patents, but I don't recognize the number format. Can someone help? 10-20020026277 would be particularly interesting. :) Steve

Re: Big CF breakthrough reported

2005-03-02 Thread Hank Scudder
Jed, Just for the heck of it I did a google on Hyunik Yang and got a large number of responses. He has reported on nanowires of Gallium Nitride and Gallium Phosphide, as well as jointly with some russians on an ”Experimental Study of Peculiarities of Electric Explosion ...

Working through the backlog.

2005-03-02 Thread Merlyn
I got a few weeks behind, so if anyone sent me a specific message, please resend it because I can't wade through that many posts in a reasonable amount of time. If nobody sent me anything specific, then I suppose I should speak up a little more often. Comments on various... Wiki is pretty cool

Re: Big CF breakthrough reported

2005-03-02 Thread Steven Krivit
Good work Robin. From their SEC filing (on their Web site) Patents 1. Hydrogen Technology 1. Korean Patent Application No. 10-2002-0026277 Energy Generating Device This patent has only been filed in Korean and has not been translated into English. The patent basically describes how the

RE: Big CF breakthrough reported

2005-03-02 Thread Keith Nagel
Hi Robin Steve, I too was disappointed when I went to KIPRIS and could not find the Korean documents. Granted, I can't read Korean, so all I hoped for was some diagrams, but nothing to be found. Don't get hung up on the zeros, as you can see from the search engine interface, they are optional.