NB:
[1] aluminum is a great example of a light metal alkali.[2] as exhausted the result will be aluminum oxide
[3] to reduce the oxide to the active metal will require work
.hence...
aluminum appears to be viable candidate... if reduction to metal can be made cost effective.
Q: can any Vo let
2 Al2O3(c,alumina,alpha) - 3 O2(g) + 4 Al(c) - 3351.4 kJ/mol (endothermic)
Reverse reaction spontaneous at 25°C. Equilibrium at about 5073°C.
I copy-pasted the above from the output of a spreadsheet I have made to work
out any thermochemistry problem (maybe our host would consider uploading it
A 0.1 volt "Zeta Potential" across the 0.2 nanometer Metal-Water
interface is 500 million volts per meter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fowler-Nordheim_equation
" The Fowler-Nordheim equation in solid state physics relates current, work and electric field strength to determine field emission.
Howdy Fred..
An example of the effect can be seen by rubbing a piece of amber over wool.
Or, in Odessa Texas where it is dry, dry, one can walk across a wool carpet in
leather shoes and touch a metal doorknob.
Richard
Electric shock to revive the mosquito trapped in the amber Richard ? ;)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: RC Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: Helmholtz Layer Metal-Water Interface...
BlankHowdy Fred..
An example of
True, but in this case we are storing the best form of energy,
electricity as opposed to a car engine. You might need cheaper
electricity to make this
gadget more than a marginal improvement over what we're stuck with now.
20% is also about the efficiency of an ICE, which is also a bit
I don't know what you're after Fred (power from surface effects? All I can
do is confirm the e-field calculation, it's 0.5GV/m all right :) but the
quotes are interesting!
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May
Michel Jullian wrote:
I don't know what you're after Fred (power from surface effects? All I can
do is confirm the e-field calculation, it's 0.5GV/m all right :) but the
quotes are interesting!
I'm after that ~ 80,000 joule/mole Spontaneous Free Energy in the
Autoionization of Water
( 0.83 eV
There is an impressive but little known body of evidence (most of
it coming from laser-ICF research and the Z machine data)
showing that the element Argon, when it is subject to very large
inputs of energy, gives off progressively larger discharges in the
soft x-ray spectrum. This spectrum
I have been watching with some amusement as the skeptics gradually
devour the Cold Fusion Controversy article in Wikipedia.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion_controversy) Every day they
delete a little more. It is like watching insects devour a dead animal.
Naturally they are
Steven,
Speaking of ICE designs, if this thought experiment should
begin to bare promising fruit I would love to see if it could be
applied to the innovative toroidal design as revealed out at
Angel Labs...
http://www.angellabsllc.com
Hmmm... how innovative is this Angel design really ?
See these essays for a psycho-social theory of pathological scepticism.
http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/articles/pdf/16.1_leiter.pdf
Quote: In fact, many Skeptics¹ will not even read significantly into the
literature on the subjects about which they are most skeptical. I have
direct
At 01:15 pm 16/05/2006 -0500, Harry wrote:
See these essays for a psycho-social theory of pathological scepticism.
http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/articles/pdf/16.1_leiter.pdf
http://www.ScientificExploration.org/jse/articles/pdf/18.4_leiter.pdf
I found those essays so fascinating,
From Jones:
Hmmm... how innovative is this Angel design really ?
Isn't it little more than a spiffy version of the 40
year old Kauertz Engine (without much in the way of
proper attribution, one might add)?
http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/POWER/rotaryIC/rotaryIC.htm#kau
Take a closer
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Do you think it's worth your time to do a little restorative surgery?
No. They will instantly undo any changes I make. I have sworn off of
Wikipedia. It is a bad habit. The procedures there do not allow a
minority view of a controversial subject such as cold
Richard's off-hand quip about static electricity reminded me of
an "Electrostatic Dragster"post I made along those lines 17 June 2005.
One might do a lot better on Electrolysis Over-Unity by tying
the negative (cathode) to Earth Ground as opposed to "floating"
it using a battery supply only.
Josephson describing the PowerPoint slides he uploaded earlier.
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/JosephsonBabstractfo.pdf
This document comes from the web site for the lecture series
Meetings of Nobel Laureates in Lindau. See:
http://www.lindau-nobel.de/content/view/19/32/
This introduces
17 matches
Mail list logo
