Re: [Vo]: Seeing Tesla with new eyes

2006-09-29 Thread John Berry
I have a friend, he's a bit odd, but anyway he told me about a friend of his (also John) who built a death ray, he isn't technical and I'm am doubtful he'd be able to come up with such interesting details, by using very strong UV lamps and high voltage was able to create just such a conductive chan

Re: [Vo]: Jed's Edict

2006-09-29 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:10:09 -0400: Hi, [snip] >The overall total energy produced >by wind is the same as the total energy from sunlight, which is no >coincidence, as Deffeyes pointed out. This is trivially false. The wind is the result of a heat engine, and n

[Vo]: (VO) FW: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday September 29, 2006

2006-09-29 Thread Akira Kawasaki
> [Original Message] > From: What's New <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 9/29/2006 1:49:27 PM Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday September 29, 2006 WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Sep 06 Washington, DC 1. DOVER PAYBACK: HOUSE VOTES TO LIMIT THE ESTABLI

RE: [Vo]: Seeing Tesla with new eyes

2006-09-29 Thread William Beaty
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hey Bill, > > This is fantastic! Then take a look at THIS one: http://amasci.com/graphics/tesblb1b.jpg It's from "Electrical Experimenter" from 1919. June issue, I think. I always thought that these old Tesla bulb devices were the same as "p

Re: [Vo]: Testing

2006-09-29 Thread leaking pen
ohh, youre using outlook express. thats your problem there. its a pos. ive had mails sent but not sent, subject lines mangled and dropped ALL the time when i was using it. On 9/29/06, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Original Message - From: "leaking pen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Vo]:

2006-09-29 Thread Jones Beene
In order to provide a proper "Subject Header" etc, etc this is a repost of a repost of a repost. Hope this one works now, since it was in plain-text from the git-go. First a definition: "Specific impulse" - A term often used in rocketry or munitions, commonly abbreviated (Isp) which rates the

[Vo]: SQM and the Observer

2006-09-29 Thread Terry Blanton
http://www.world-science.net/othernews/060923_quantum.htm Physicists seek to put one thing in two places Sept. 25, 2006 Special to World Science Physi­cists say they have made an ob­ject move just by watch­ing it. This is in­spir­ing them to a still bold­er proj­ect: put­ting a small, or­di­nar

RE: [Vo]: Testing

2006-09-29 Thread Keith Nagel
Hi Jones, This is the mail script Bill posted to this forum several months ago when he implemented the new policy. Clearly, it has a bug. He installed it on his server, so someone needs to find the bug and correct it, then send him the revised version for him to install. Could I do this? Probabl

Re: [Vo]: Testing

2006-09-29 Thread Jones Beene
Hi Keith, Well ... as a notroious non-complainer ... Debug Bills mail script, as follows. :0 * ! ^Subject: (Re:(\[[1-9]+\])? )?\[Vo\]: { :0 w CURRENT_SUBJ=| formail -zx Subject: :0 fhw | formail -I"Subject: [Vo]: $CURRENT_SUBJ" }

RE: [Vo]: Testing

2006-09-29 Thread Keith Nagel
Well, there are two options. A) Complain. or B) Debug Bills mail script, as follows. :0 * ! ^Subject: (Re:(\[[1-9]+\])? )?\[Vo\]: { :0 w CURRENT_SUBJ=| formail -zx Subject: :0 fhw | formail -I"Subject: [Vo]: $CURRENT_SUBJ" }

Re: [Vo]: Testing

2006-09-29 Thread Jones Beene
- Original Message - From: "leaking pen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> well, all i did was write a suject in the subject field. are you adding the [Vo}: yourself jones? No - did not add [Vo] but I started the message out in HTML (using Outlook Express) and then changed it to plain text at

Re: [Vo]: Testing

2006-09-29 Thread leaking pen
well, all i did was write a suject in the subject field. are you adding the [Vo}: yourself jones? On 9/29/06, leaking pen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: testing subject. -- That which yields isn't always weak. -- That which yields isn't always weak.

Re: [Vo]:

2006-09-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: For the benefit of those who only use the Vortex archives, blank subject headings are becoming an inconvenience. Hope this one works. It worked! It is blank. Blankety-blank-blank. - Jed

[Vo]: Testing

2006-09-29 Thread leaking pen
testing subject. -- That which yields isn't always weak.

[Vo]: Re:

2006-09-29 Thread Jones Beene
WTF does one need to do to get the subject header to show up these days ? Fred mentioined some time ago - that in a reply, one needs to add a double space after eliminating the second "re:" - but do you need to add a double space on a new posting befor you type it in ? I never had to do that

Re: [Vo]: SUVs

2006-09-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Someone (John Steck?) wrote: > Just a question to all the pontificators... how is a family of 5 or more to > travel about in this age of seat belts and car seats? Guess what... > minivans and SUVs for many of us are a legislated requirement not a luxury. Minivans get good gas mileage and they

[Vo]:

2006-09-29 Thread Jones Beene
In order to provide a proper "Subject Header" (not to mention your antonym-of-the-day) and to clean-up typos and add some detail (yeah, yeah ... Form a more perfect Union, Establish Justice, Insure Domestic Tranquility, etc) ... this is mostly a repost. For the benefit of those who only use the