Re: [Vo]:OT: 9/11 encore une fois
Howdy Michael, Since Cotillard is an intellectual perhaps he can explain in simple language why he believes in a 9/11 conspiracy. Where are they hiding the passengers? While on the subject.. who the heck is they. How does one gain sufficent credibility to have their insights believed publically ? A lot of drunks at the Dime Box Saloon will agree ONE building could implode from being struck by an airplane. A few drunks may agree TWO buildings may implode exactly alike... BUT.. there ain't nodody here, drunk nor sober that will accept THREE buildings exploding in identical fashion when the third building was NOT struck by an airplane. I watched the TV that day. I wasnt there. I don't know what happened Neither do I know what happened at the Pentagon. The only option I have is whether I accept the version purveyed by the 9/11 commission.I don't! I don't have a version to offer since I'm not an intellectual. I can accept the possibility that over the 400 years since Machevelli composed his how to on how to betray friends and intimidate people, somebody a whole lot smarter than me has improved on his strategies. Richard Michael Foster wrote, I read where Marion Cotillard is a believer in the 9/11 conspiracy theory. It's important that those with the crediblity to do so express their insights publicly. The sheer mental force brought by such a well-known French intellect is probably more convincing close up.
Re: [Vo]:OT: 9/11 encore une fois
--- R C Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since Cotillard is an intellectual perhaps he can explain in simple language why he believes in a 9/11 conspiracy. Where are they hiding the passengers? While on the subject.. who the heck is they. How does one gain sufficent credibility to have their insights believed publically ? Sorry Richard, I was being facetious. Cotillard is the smokin' hot French actress who won the best actress Oscar this year for La Vie en Rose. Michael Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
[Vo]:Re: Physics lecture
The Twincities Creation Science Association, TSCA, sent me the following email. I'm planning on attending if any of you have questions about theoretical physics. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wednesday, March 5th 2008 Univ. of Minn VAN VLECK PUBLIC LECTURE - 4:00 pm - 150 Physics Bldg Speaker: David Gross, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, UCSB Subject: The Coming Revolutions in Fundamental Physics Refreshments served in Room 216 Physics at 3:30 p.m. I review the present state of knowledge in elementary particle physics and the questions that we are currently addressing. I discuss the experimental revolutions that might occur at the Large Hadron Collider, soon to be finished at CERN. I shall also review the state of string theory. The necessity to go beyond the standard model of particle physics and to understand quantum gravity has led to this ambitious attempt to unify all the forces of nature and all forms of matter as different vibrations of a string-like object. But string theory is still in a pre-revolutionary stage.Although remarkable progress has been achieved in the last decade in understanding the perturbative and non-perturbative structure of string theory, we still lack a fundamental understanding of the theory. Many string theorists suspect that a profound conceptual change in our concept of space and time will be required for the final formulation of string theory. --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
[Vo]:Nordberg's lightballs
Thomas, Thank's for thinking of me. . I have looked over Nortberg's work. He states the cross product E X B is gravity. This is wrong. ExB is the Poynting vector. It describes the amount of energy that is in motion. ExB / c gives the momentum of the energy flow dp/dt The induced gravitational field is equal to this change in momentum times a motion constant gravity = (G/ccr) (dp/dt) Nurberg's fundamental premise is wrong. Frank **It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf000301)
[Vo]:Jeff Cook sent this to me
**It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf000301) ---BeginMessage--- All, I have filmed a new video that demonstrates the Jeff Cook Effect with a new hobby aparatus that hope to market as a scientific novelty. It is extremely inexpensive to construct, so it could be sold for well under $30 retail. I invite you all to check this out, as it is quite revealing. It's not streamed, so a long download time. But I think well worth your wait. Link to the download page: http://www.jeffreyncook.com/jeff%20cook%20effect/jeff%20cook%20effect%20video.htm Thanks, Jeff Cook ---End Message---
