Re: [Vo]:Where's the beef? was: Stupid Academic stunt

2008-04-08 Thread thomas malloy

Jones Beene wrote:


--- Terry Blanton wrote:

 


I'm sure all you have to do is go back and look to
the people that handed over the first $20M.  
   


However, presently, since there are no apparent
working prototypes from companies like AEI, who have
an immediate commercial interest and are located only
minutes away from the BLP facility - it appears to
this unbiased observer that we are back to the energy
corollary of the Fermi Paradox... which is really just
another way of saying where's the beef ?

I visited the BLP website. I noticed the picture of what looks like an oil refinery retort. The website gives the impression that the BLP technology is ready to go to on the grid. OTOH, Mills has always intimated that, and AFAIK, they are no where near to doing that. I'm reminded of the tri necked glass retort with the beautiful purple glow that they had on there, along with the contention that it was producing energy at the same concentration as in ICE. What is beyond dispute is that BLP has spent a lot of money on the lab equipment in the pictures. OTOH, perhaps they did it the same way that the producers of that movie on C F (Critical Mass?), did it. They made Professor Susslick an offer he couldn't refuse on some junk lab equipment.   




--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- 
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---



[Vo]:re: dumb academic stunt

2008-04-08 Thread fznidarsic
I see Mills has hydrino metals, hydrino power, hydrino rocket motors, hydrino 
study groups, and hydrino papers.

The problem is; ?there is no such thing as a hydrino.? Noone one has any except 
Mills.? Mills has them all!??


Spwar has something.? That is a real start.


What is the former CEO of Westinghouse doing on?the Blacklight?board of 
directors?

I'm now here in Pittsburgh PA at Emerson Electric.? I am doing a factory 
acceptance test on a distributed controls system.? This Emerson location is a 
spin off of Westinghouse Technology.? The Ovation computer technology? is good 
stuff.


I went to?see the ?VP here at this location.? I asked him about the former CEO 
of Westinghouse being at BlackLight.

Perhops I will find out something.


Frank Znidarsic


Re: [Vo]:Where's the beef? was: Stupid Academic stunt

2008-04-08 Thread R C Macaulay


Thomas wrote,

However, presently, since there are no apparent
working prototypes  What is beyond dispute is that BLP has spent a lot 
of money..


Howdy Thomas,
Well.. err.. let's observe it was BLP  that spent a lot of AEI et al's 
money. Back in the late '50's I invested in a deal like this.. took me two 
years to finally get the notion I bought a pig in the poke.
Ole story of the East Texas coon dog that had romance on his mind but 'nery 
a female dog  in Crocket county he noticed a pretty girl skunk started 
looking better every night.. so one time he gave it a try.. and after.. he 
told her.. I'll admit it was fun while it lasted... but.. whew! I've had 
about all of this I can take.


Some catch the smell on the fly, some get a good wiff as they get together.. 
and some have no nose for it.


For sure Herb Kellerer with Southwest Airlines had a clothspin on his nose 
as he listened at the Congressional hearing  and watched the FAA guy testify 
in tears about how he was threatened into silence. Ole Herb must have 
smelled that skunk  as he likely wondered about flight 800 and the job the 
FAA did on the investigation,, no tears that time.. still no tears.. but.. 
if you ever run over a skunk ya better not park yur car in the garage for 
awhile.


Richard



Re: [Vo]:re: dumb academic stunt

2008-04-08 Thread R C Macaulay



Frank Z wrote,
I asked him about the former CEO of Westinghouse being at BlackLight.

Perhops I will find out something.

Howdy Frank,

Westinghouse had talent and people knee deep back until the early '70's .. so,, 
they dumped the brains for tricks  and tried to corner the market for enriched 
uranium. Poof ! ...went Westinghouse's cards. Same happened to Bear Stearns.. 
fast money, fast markets, fast fall. But when yur playing poker with sumbuddy 
else's money.. who cares.

Richard



Re: [Vo]:Which are the new results at BLP?

2008-04-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
This must be what everyone is talking about. The description of the 
power plant is rather nebulous. The section gets off on the wrong 
foot with this statement:


Atomic hydrogen ordinarily has a stable electronic state that is 
much higher in energy than allowed by thermodynamic laws.


Even if you believe that you can violate the laws of thermodynamics, 
you shouldn't say so in the first sentence.


This part gives me a headache:

BlackLight intends to incrementally pursue commercial development of 
power plants of all useful scales. This will be done through a 
combination of internal engineering and development, external 
consultants and outsourcing, licensed joint ventures and acquisition 
of engineering and design companies. BlackLight intends to own an 
interest in power production businesses at the distributed and 
central power station scale (see Licensing Strategy). BlackLight 
anticipates contracting for turnkey plants to be built and operated 
by architect and engineering firms and original equipment manufacturers.


I have said it before, and I'll say it again: this notion of 
incremental commercial development masterminded by Mills makes 
about as much sense as letting the Wright brothers mastermind the 
development of airplanes, or putting Martin Fleischmann in charge of 
cold fusion. The Wrights wanted delay, delay and delay, and Martin 
told me that in 1989 he wanted another five years of secrecy -- peace 
and quiet, in other words -- before revealing the process. Blacklight 
power has taken 20 years so far, and at the pace they are moving it 
will take another 20 years. If the airplane had been developed at 
this rate of progress, the first public demonstration of flight would 
have been after 1933, and the first practical airplane would have 
been scheduled for 1953.


This is lunacy. If their claims have any merit, and they can 
demonstrate the effect on any scale large enough to be measured with 
confidence, they could have every qualified laboratory on earth 
working frantically on this discovery in 6 months. That's what 
happened after the Wrights were finally forced to go public in 1908.


- Jed



[Vo]:Which are the new results at BLP?

2008-04-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
I have not been following events at BlacklightPower. It is unclear to 
me which part of the web site, or which paper, reports the progress 
being discussed here about solid fuel. The What's New section does 
not describe any recent technical progress as far as I can tell. Is 
this the new stuff? Under Applications Development it says:


http://www.blacklightpower.com/applications.shtml#BlackLightPowerPlants

BlackLight Power has recently achieved a breakthrough in power 
generation . . . There is no date. How recent is recent?


Or are we talking about this paper?

Mills, R., et al., Catalysis of atomic hydrogen to new hydrides as a 
new power source, Int. J. Global Energy Issues, Vol. 28, Nos. 2/3, 2007


http://www.blacklightpower.com/papers/IJGEI_28(2-3)_Paper_12.pdf

It is the most recent one.

- Jed



[Vo]:New York Times energy The Energy Challenge

2008-04-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
The Times has some good articles about conventional alternative 
energy, A Series, The Energy Challenge. Index to articles here:


http://www.nytimes.com/ref/science/earth/energy.html

I mentioned this one before:

Move Over, Oil, There's Money in Texas Wind

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/business/23wind.html

Here is a good article on solar thermal:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/06/business/06solar.html

- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Which are the new results at BLP?

2008-04-08 Thread Jed Rothwell

Robin van Spaandonk wrote:


Atomic hydrogen ordinarily has a stable electronic state that is
much higher in energy than allowed by thermodynamic laws.

Even if you believe that you can violate the laws of thermodynamics,
you shouldn't say so in the first sentence.

Actually, it says that the laws of thermodynamics allow one to go below the
ground state.


In that case it is badly phrased. [M]uch higher than allowed by . . 
. sounds like the author thinks the laws of thermodynamics will not 
allow this to happen.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Which are the new results at BLP?

2008-04-08 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:58:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
This must be what everyone is talking about. The description of the 
power plant is rather nebulous. The section gets off on the wrong 
foot with this statement:

Atomic hydrogen ordinarily has a stable electronic state that is 
much higher in energy than allowed by thermodynamic laws.

Even if you believe that you can violate the laws of thermodynamics, 
you shouldn't say so in the first sentence.

Actually, it says that the laws of thermodynamics allow one to go below the
ground state.
[snip]
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

The shrub is a plant.



[Vo]:Magnetic pressure and magnetic temperature

2008-04-08 Thread David Jonsson
Hi

Magnetic pressure is a well known concept.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_pressure

It struck me then that other concepts must be applicable to magnetism too
like temperature. And there should also be electric pressure and
temperature.
The magnetic pressure Pm=B^2/2ยต0 shourld vary on particle scale just as
kinetic energy does in a gas.

David


[Vo]:Simpler Biodiesel

2008-04-08 Thread Jones Beene
Fred Sparber alerted me to the following patent:

US# 4,557,734 now expired 

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.htmlr=14f=Gl=50co1=ANDd=PTXTs1=4451267OS=4451267RS=4451267

Which is in the public domain and which teaches a
method of minimal processing for raw vegetable oil, or
perhaps even raw oil-algae... in which the simple
emulsification, or possibly sonication with water and
alcohol and a cheap emulsifier can provide a highly
energetic fuel, and with a resultant high effective
conversion of that fuel into energy in an unmodified
diesel engine.

From the patent abstract: One area of particular
interest relates to fuels for commercial and
agricultural vehicles that are powered by diesel
engines. The prospect of farmers becoming
self-sufficient in regard to their energy needs has
led to investigations of vegetable oils as diesel fuel
substitutes. 

Deterrents to this concept are the generally inferior
fuel properties of crude vegetable oils as compared to
those of diesel oil. Of particular concern is the
inherently high viscosity which causes poor
atomization in direct-injected diesel engines. 

This results in fouling of the injectors and cylinders
as well as a buildup of noncombusted fuel in the
crankcase causing a thickening of the lubricating oil.
This invention relates to a blended vegetable oil fuel
which circumvents many of these problems. 

VERY INTERESTING ! Here we have a public domain
solution to several related problems of small farm or
aquaculture operations, which can produce lots of raw
biomass (algae) but need a minimal secondary system
for getting that biomass into a proper fuel for a
normal diesel engine. 

Here it is folks, no royalty required!

This could be one of those minor (but actually major)
little nails which builds an entire new energy 
infrastructure...

Jones



Re: [Vo]:Magnetic pressure and magnetic temperature

2008-04-08 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to  David Jonsson's message of Wed, 9 Apr 2008 00:35:22 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Hi

Magnetic pressure is a well known concept.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_pressure

It struck me then that other concepts must be applicable to magnetism too
like temperature. 

Temperature is really a measure of the average kinetic energy of particles, so a
magnetic temperature may not have a lot of meaning.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

The shrub is a plant.



[VO]: Blowing smoke in the wind

2008-04-08 Thread R C Macaulay

Howdy Vorts,
The Houston Chronicle article today kinda disputes claims regarding the idea of 
using windmills. The power produced ain't worth the power to produce without 
heavy subsidies. Also reports that a norther blew in one day and the wind farm 
output dropped so low that it upset the grid and almost caused a major blackout.
 Some third of the big mills are down for repairs at any one time. Nobody has 
reliable figures on real operating cost cuz the whole business is sorta off the 
books.. well... kinda.. Algorish sorta accounting. After all , it's green  
..ain't it ? Our local area electric co-op advertizes wind power as an option 
for a coupla cents more per willowatt. That's what the Dime Box saloon 
describes green energy as.. willowatts.

The whole wind energy business is so convoluted with politics and tax tricks 
that it's starting to resemble the DoE.
You know.. the outfit that awarded a contract to Lockheed for an advanced 
design warplane for some 138 billion bucks and have zilch to show for their 
money so far... but not to worry.. the Marine heliocopter deal for 38 choppers 
for the white house fits the pattern.. megabucks spent and no choppers yet.
Hey ! bartender !! slide one down the bar to Jed.. he has a perplexed look on 
his face.. musta been something he read about BLP.
Richard


 Jed mentioned this link,
Move Over, Oil, There's Money in Texas Wind

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/business/23wind.html