Great John, now if you can convince the fools who buy systems for the
voting public to use your method, we might be saved from a disaster in
November.
Ed
On Sep 11, 2008, at 4:32 PM, John Berry wrote:
I don't have time to go into it at this moment but I believe I have
found a way to have o
Edmund Storms wrote:
You all would fail at solving murder mysteries. Consider the facts:
1. Diebold makes ATMs, which are secure. Therefore, they know how to
do a good job.
2. Diebold is owned by people who are strong supporters of the
Republican party. Therefore they have a self interest in
I don't have time to go into it at this moment but I believe I have found a
way to have online voting secure and cheat proof if anyone is curious, it's
not really hard.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Edmund Storms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> You all would fail at solving murder mysteries. Con
This book is not properly described. Actually, it is collection of
papers given at an ACS meeting. I'm glad to see it is available for
$175. The ACS wanted $400 to sell me 100 preprints of only my
contribution.
Ed
On Sep 11, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
http://www.oup.com/
You all would fail at solving murder mysteries. Consider the facts:
1. Diebold makes ATMs, which are secure. Therefore, they know how to
do a good job.
2. Diebold is owned by people who are strong supporters of the
Republican party. Therefore they have a self interest in gaming the
system
See:
http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Chemistry/NuclearChemistry/?view=usa&ci=9780841269668
By the way, Diebold is in the ATM business. Readers here did not know
that would miss my point. I am sure there are plenty of programmers
at Diebold who know how to do secure touch-screen transaction
processing. It is an old, long established company. You can bet your
boots that no Russian hack
Beni sez bin has-been
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/242.html
Jones Beene wrote:
> What's the deal with Ike ?... what a strange one Ike is ...
>
> At first the nut-cases were flooding the blogsphere with reports that
> Ike might be a HAARP engineered storm, whose main purpose was to create
> a "burp" in falling crude oil prices, since crude appeared to be
Jed -
>> One of the strengths of Microsoft is that they have many people with many
different backgrounds who are familiar with such things.
A *Microsoft* voting machine. Now we're talkin'. The guy who gets elected
from votes on that system will find himself to be the new president of
Romania, a
Science used to be objective.. not any more as Purdue proved. Locally, we
have the essence of your comment "One mark of
them is that they loath freedom of expression, they seem to like controlling
what people do and think".
The local essence is the University of Houston( a State school) . U o
What's the deal with Ike ?... what a strange one Ike is ...
At first the nut-cases were flooding the blogsphere with reports that Ike might
be a HAARP engineered storm, whose main purpose was to create a "burp" in
falling crude oil prices, since crude appeared to be headed below $100
recently..
Rick Monteverde wrote:
Funny that technophiles like us would object to these the way we do. I guess
it's because we know easily computer systems can often be defeated even when
they're touted as being rock solid. Heck, most of the time you don't even
have to *try* to get them to fail.
Well, I
- Original Message
From: Robin van Spaandonk
> I have wondered about He iso H undergoing shrinkage, and have previously also
suggested that perhaps virtually any nucleus could steal a shrunken electron
from a Hydrino. However I doubt that there is really anything like this going on
in "s
I volunteer at a polling place (Honolulu). Started doing that after the 2000
election to try to keep all that Florida style craziness from happening
here. Most people here have the idea that those machines are junk and vote
paper. Last election I think we had about 6 voters use the machine out of
7
Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>> There is *NO* *MENTION* of a "voter verified" paper record. There is
>> *NO* requirement that the voter be allowed to *see* the paper record
>> indicating how they voted.
>
> The link you point is the 2002 law. Do you mean the replacement S
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
There is *NO* *MENTION* of a "voter verified" paper record. There is
*NO* requirement that the voter be allowed to *see* the paper record
indicating how they voted.
The link you point is the 2002 law. Do you mean the replacement
S.3212, "Bipartisan Electronic Votin
Howdy Tex,
Storm coming your way. Watch out for the low lying land at Galverston near
the oil refinery. Ironic if you believe man-made GW?
We've approached venture capital and state funding. Yes sea change in
attitude to new energy physics. It can be between a rock and a hard place:
the bottom li
There has been some discussion on this list in the past regarding
electronic voting and the vital role played by a voter-verified paper
trail. In 2002 the U.S. election system was reformed, with the passage
of HAVA (the Help America Vote Act), which aims to eliminate the
problems caused by punch c
I uploaded the conference link and lecture abstract to the news section:
http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm
- Jed
Howdy Remi,
Quantum Entanglement ?? You mean like..
Don Rumsfeld stating deficits no longer matter.
The US Guv'ment just printing 5.4 trillion dollars and change to bail out
the drunks at Fred & Fannie's bar and grill?
Well.. err.. maybe not bail 'em out, just sorta allowed them to keep running
See:
http://www.vaeng.com/news/dr-nagel-to-keynote-isa-expo-2008
Dr. David J. Nagel, Research Professor at The George Washington
University, will present the International Society for Measurement &
Control (ISA) EXPO 2008 Keynote/Rimbach Lecture on October 15th at
ISA EXPO 2008 in Houston, Te
22 matches
Mail list logo
