On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Thank you for not adding all the livelong day G
I prefer See the little pufferbellies all in a row.
Seriously ... Check out ORC
http://www.infinityturbine.com/ORC/ORC_Waste_Heat_Turbine.html
This looks interesting for
So, Rich,
Your original post also copies Scott, his daughter and Uncle Hal. Any
reason you're not makin' it right with them?
T
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
My guess is there is a need to
maintain a gradient in order to start the reactor and that is the work
of the PLCs.
BTW, the gradient is pure speculation on my part. I just know that
when you exit infinite improbability
Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Jed, it's a container, with all the walls at several hundred degrees C or
higher; the bottom's in contact with the burner and is probably at about
1000 C.
There is nothing inside the container except gas: Gaseous water.
Yet you are claiming the
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, I seem to remember that self - sustain meant working at only 100 W
electrical input.
Celani said that on Monday. That was his somewhat arbitrary definition of
self-sustaining, during his talk. However, Levi et al. mentioned that the
machine
Hi Jed,
What you wrote is true when there is liquid water and steam together in
a container - the combination cannot be heated to a temperature higher
than 100 deg C without raising the pressure. However once all the
liquid has turned to gas there is no longer any limit to what
temperature
jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au wrote:
What you wrote is true when there is liquid water and steam together in a
container - the combination cannot be heated to a temperature higher than
100 deg C without raising the pressure. However once all the liquid has
turned to gas there is no longer any
Hi Peter
At least and eventually the community at Chennai tries to determine
what the PROBLEM with field, see please Krivit's blog - and if you
will be so kind, my comment to it.
If you would be so kind as to point me to the specific reference. It isn't
obvious to me what reference you are
From Peter:
...
The essence is that Cold Fusion is unfortunately in a
deep, diversified, damned trouble
See my original post.
I rest my case.
... but perhaps there is a way out.
Yes, perhaps there is.
The evolution of science is a patient but impartial mistress.
Regards,
Steven Vincent
Consider a well-insulated box. It contains a reservoir holding a
substance with high specific heat and high melting point. Into the
reservoir, and through a tube into the box, may flow water, and steam
may escape. Internal controls may regulate flow. Hot air may be used
to initially heat the
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Consider a well-insulated box. It contains a reservoir holding a substance
with high specific heat and high melting point. Into the reservoir, and
through a tube into the box, may flow water, and steam may escape.
I am a chemist (chemical engineer, actually) Can you give some
practical examples and heat balances for them?
Thanks!
Peter
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Consider a
On 02/10/2011 08:28 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au mailto:jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au wrote:
What you wrote is true when there is liquid water and steam
together in a container - the combination cannot be heated to a
temperature higher than 100 deg C
--- On Tue, 2/8/11, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The New Thorium Cycle ?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, 9:52 PM
Thanks for the information George.
As you know, there is little way to avoid further
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/09/us-science-cern-idUSTRE7185AQ20110209
(Reuters) - Scientists at the CERN research center seeking answers to
key mysteries of the cosmos said on Wednesday they would be moving
ahead cautiously this year to avoid any possible breakdown in their
giant LHC
On 02/10/2011 11:19 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/09/us-science-cern-idUSTRE7185AQ20110209
(Reuters) - Scientists at the CERN research center seeking answers to
key mysteries of the cosmos said on Wednesday they would be moving
ahead cautiously this year to
Several Distinguished Scientists have informed me that I am wrong, and that
gas will not expand indefinitely, but that it will rise in temperature even
when it is unconfined. There is a limit to how much it can expand.
Compression heats it and decompression cools it, but only up to a limit. You
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Oh? Will that be the year the Tibetan monks finally inscribe name
number 9,000,000,000 in the book?
I thought they had a computer working on that. :-)
T
. . . overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12400647
Robots to get their own internet
By Mark Ward
Technology correspondent, BBC News
European scientists have embarked on a project to let robots share and
store what they discover about the world.
Called RoboEarth it will be a place that robots can
This is exceptionally weird, even for Steve Krivit:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/02/07/missing-cold-fusion-from-new-energy-times/
I posted a note here mentioning that the best evidence for helium is the
work of Melvin Miles. Krivit said that New Energy Times has found Melvin
Miles’
Terry sez:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12400647
Robots to get their own internet
By Mark Ward
Technology correspondent, BBC News
European scientists have embarked on a project to let robots share and
store what they discover about the world.
Called RoboEarth it will be a place
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Consider a well-insulated box. It contains a reservoir holding a substance
with high specific heat and high melting point. Into the reservoir, and
through a tube into the box, may flow water, and steam may escape. Internal
controls may regulate
Jed,
You are overlooking helium as being supplied by alpha emission from Pd,
instead of from fusion.
This has been the WL stance - yes, there is helium but it comes from alpha
emission following a beta decay of other weak force interaction.
That was my reason for re-presenting the
Rich Murray wrote:
probably, the Rossi demos have a complex control box with thermal controls
that lower the electric input heater power when the reactor gets too hot
You concede to easily.
I don't believe there is any feedback in that system because the wires are
all heavy power cables,
Or beware of VIKI from I ROBOT.
harry
- Original Message
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, February 10, 2011 12:09:38 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Here Comes Skynet
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12400647
Robots to get their own internet
By
From Jones
...
This field cannot be simplified into an either/or situation.
Ockham has no place in this field – LENR it is inherently
complex.
Krivit and his sponsors are half-right (but half-wrong),
as is anyone who says that LENR is pure fusion and nothing
else.
There are clearly
The theory is the helium is the end of a sequence of fissions initiated
by palladium nuclei absorbing neutrons.
harry
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, February 10, 2011 12:15:12 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results
This
Dear Joshua,
a) Have you calculated HOW wet must be the steam in order to invalidate
the experiment i.e. to make it underunity beyond any doubt?
b) Let's take the good part of it, as engineers how has to be built such a
generator for VERY WET steam? It can have some uses e.g in the textile
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Celani said that on Monday. That was his somewhat arbitrary definition of
self-sustaining, during his talk. However, Levi et al. mentioned that the
machine self-sustained completely, with no power, for about 15 minutes. No
power and no way to turn it off. They exhausted the
On 02/10/2011 02:23 PM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Joshua,
a) Have you calculated HOW wet must be the steam in order to invalidate
the experiment i.e. to make it underunity beyond any doubt?
b) Let's take the good part of it, as engineers how has to be built such a
generator for VERY WET
a) It would appear that if the water is just boiling (the expelled fluid is
1% steam), it is already slightly over unity, assuming we can trust the
flow rates, and I have some doubts. But slightly over unity would not be
difficult to achieve chemically, especially with a 14 kg bottle of hydrogen
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Addressing just point (3), please leave out the term dare here. There's
no need to escalate this to the realm of an ad hominem.
Peter is Romanian and I am sure he does not intend the term to be ad
hominem. Idioms can
Good point...
On 02/10/2011 03:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Addressing just point (3), please leave out the term dare here. There's
no need to escalate this to the realm of an ad hominem.
Peter is Romanian
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:59:12 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
My impression is that it was somewhat out of control. I would not want to
try to scale a machine that does that to 1 MW in the near future.
[snip]
That's the way all fission reactors operate. Borderline nuclear
I intended to tell that I think he was convinced that the steam was dry. I
have met Focardi several times and he seems a very nice gentleman. His
association with Rossi is a very complicated problem (I tell this as a
friend of Piantelli, Focardi has worked many years with him.)
As regarding
http://www.blacklightpower.com/new.shtml
Dr. Mills will present “Thermally Reversible Hydrino Catalyst Systems as a New
Power Source” at the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Conference on February 14,
2011, at 4:10 PM at the Gaylord National Hotel Conference Center, 201
Waterfront Street,
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Has Andrea Rossi become Randell Mills' Steve Jones?
Not sure that is the best analogy, or maybe it is right-on ... but looking
at pages 37-41 look are so close to the way that one can imagine the Rossi
reactor to work (if he had had the funds to
From Harry:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/new.shtml
Dr. Mills will present Thermally Reversible Hydrino Catalyst Systems as a New
Power Source at the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Conference on February 14,
2011, at 4:10 PM at the Gaylord National Hotel Conference Center, 201
Waterfront
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
... which is where I think you are going with it, even if it is a slight
reversal of roles.
Not a LawOrder fan but Belzer does put me in the mind of Mills.
Ya gotta think that Randell has had a baloney sandwich despite
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
And WTF is going on in Iceland?
Personally, I'm being audited by the IRS. If I can only put them off
for about 20 months, my worries will probably be over.
I'm sure it will get worse.
T
Still got that reply to thing, SVJ?
T
-- Forwarded message --
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Dr. Mills will present “Thermally
Reversible Hydrino Catalyst Systems as a New Power Source”
To: s...@orionworks.com
Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
The theory is the helium is the end of a sequence of fissions initiated
by palladium nuclei absorbing neutrons.
Ah. I see. And I gather it involves lithium as well. Does it consume
deuterium and produce helium at the same rate as DD fusion would? I guess
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting times..
Pyramids and Big Ben are off my Bucket List.
T
At 12:34 PM 2/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
It would be a little tricky to have something like this produce the
output performance of the Rossi device. You would have to have a
secret remote control that vectors most of the cooling water around
the heat source at first, and then gradually
Look at www.wikipedia.com for Blacklight Power and then the talk
page -- the only favorable information in two decades is invariably is
put out by BP itself...
Rich Murray
You laugh, but advanced awareness explorers report that all universes
already always all ways remain nonexistent...
within single entire creative fractal hyperinfinity...
The place on which I stand is hole ground.
The birds in the air have their nests in the trees,
The foxes on the earth rest
Given enough energy fast enough, any gas becomes a black hole, and
then all science reaches the Duh zone...
single source of all that appears objective
of all that feels subjective
within awareness
already remains beyond our time and space
beyond the Duh zone...
single entire creative fractal
47 matches
Mail list logo