[Vo]:Rossi Rejects Paper Due to Carbon Catalyst Theory?
Hello Everyone, On the following page a person details how Rossi stated he would publish their paper, but then did not do so. The person theorizes that the paper might have not been published due to the fact he mentions CARBON as a possible catalyst. http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=49923.0 Could carbon be the catalyst? What do all of you think? Do any of you have an idea of what the catalyst might be?
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion's Carbon Rings of Benzene
Terry Blanton wrote: but, note, that the article says that Case had his own special mixture of activated carbon. Now, as I recall, he actually made his from coconut shells. I do not know if he made them. I doubt it. Many of the commercial catalysts are deposited on carbonized coconut shells or husks (see). It is naturally occurring fractalized material. Fractalized does not appear to be a word, but you know what I mean. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Rossi responds to movie professor and Peter Ekstrom's analysis
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.comwrote: 5. The pressure in the ecat cannot be room pressure, or the fluid would not flow out of the ecat into the room. As I understand the operation, fluid does not flow out. Steam is venting from a hole in the device. Steam is a fluid. I don't know about a hole in the device other than the one the hose is connected to, but the reason steam vents to the room is because the pressure in the device is higher than in the room. A ball rolls downhill, and fluid flows down pressure. Of course gravity affects fluid flow too, but the ecat has to push the fluid up first, meaning still higher pressure is needed. Therefore, the pressure should be 'near' room pressure. Near, maybe, but higher, definitely. It doesn't need to be very much higher to increase the boiling point a little. It only takes 30 cm of water depth to increase the bp by one degree C. So perhaps the disagreement on pressure is simply a communication issue. If Rossi uses a slightly elevated bp as evidence of dry steam, then the issue is more than communication. The fact that the temperature is perfectly flat indicates the steam is at, not above, the boiling point.
[Vo]:A poll : is the eCat steam quality a problem?
I've set up a survey at http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22CPD9867MH/ Results can (I hope) be seen at: http://www.zoomerang.com/Shared/SharedResultsPasswordPage.aspx?ID=L26QG6QVBZQL
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion's Carbon Rings of Benzene
On 11-07-11 08:31 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:57 AM, noone noonethesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote: Also, a previous cold fusion researcher used carbon as a catalyst, but did not produce near as much heat as Rossi's system. Here is a link about his work... http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazi ... date2.html Earthtech attempted a replication of Les Case's experiment without success: http://earthtech.org/experiments/index.html (see Case Experiment) The catalyst was G75-E catalyst from United Catalysts. Les used G75-D in his experiment at IE: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MalloveEreproducib.pdf but, note, that the article says that Case had his own special mixture of activated carbon. And Scott Little used catalyst samples provided to him by Les Case. Another one of these frustrating test series done with the cooperation of the original researcher, where Little seems, by the end of the series, to have addressed all the points where he could be going wrong, and yet ... no excess heat. Now, as I recall, he actually made his from coconut shells. T
Re: [Vo]:Rossi responds to movie professor and Peter Ekstrom's analysis
This document, “the E-Cat does not produce excess Energy” has some some strange assertions. http://www.fysik.org/WebSite/fragelada/resurser/cold_fusion_krivit.pdf Where does the power go? Out of the E-Cat or the tube? Not very likely since the losses are small, 5 kW is a lot of power and it would heat the room perceptibly. It would heat the area around the e-cat, and people who have observed the tests tell me that it does. However it would not heat the room if the thermostat is nearby the reactor. On the contrary, it would cool down the rest of the room, in winter with central heating or in summer with central air. It is a big room and I doubt that 5 kW would make much difference. That would be the equivalent of 3 U.S. electric room heaters. There are large offices with more heaters than that under people's desks. I have one myself. That's probably a violation of fire laws but anyway, they do not make the offices warm. Also, the aggregate office equipment and lighting in a large office or grocery store consumes a lot more than 5 kW but those places are not noticeably hot. Anyway, Ekstrom is wrong. Most of the heat is going down the drain, as steam or hot water. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Rossi responds to movie professor and Peter Ekstrom's analysis
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:14:40 -0700: Hi, I suspect that instead of controlled he meant checked. The Dutch word kontroleren means to check. and a similar situation may exist with Swedish/Norwegian (due to the Norse/Germanic origin of the Dutch language). Here's a statement from Kullander that is a bit confusing... The temperature at the outlet was controlled continually to be above 100°C. According to the electronic log-book, it remained always between 100.1 and 100.2 °C during the operation from 10:45 to 16:30 as can be seen in figure 7. The outlet was controlled is obviously not right... there's nothing to control at the outlet! This must be more an issue with english not being his native language. What he means is that the temperature of the steam exiting the outlet was always maintained between 100.1 and 100.2. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:UFOs Over London
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:09:53 -0300: Hi, [snip] Not photoshoped, but a good visual effects video. Probably promotional viral video for some movie, in the style first person style of amateur filming like Blair Witch Project or Cloverfield ... I LOVE THESE KINDS OF MOVIES!!! :D There is a weird date at the corner, 12-06-11, where the filming was made, with a line This is the life. I searched for this, and I am not the only one to think like this: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13093231500A39040100page=1 YAY! :D AFAIK they use the same dating system in the UK as they do here in Australia, which means that 12/6/2011 is the 12 th of June, not the sixth of December. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:UFOs Over London
The video dates June 24th, 2011... so it doesn't make sense... Perhaps it is another date, chinese/japanese numbering, June 11th 2012.
RE: [Vo]:UFOs Over London
http://www.allinlondon.co.uk/knowledge/posts.php?thread=13183 London artists Jamie King (feat. Sway) released an album in June called This is the Life: Release date - 12/06/11 Now, whether the video was just an advertising scheme is the question. The date format question is moot. Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:17:34 -0300 Subject: Re: [Vo]:UFOs Over London From: danieldi...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com The video dates June 24th, 2011... so it doesn't make sense... Perhaps it is another date, chinese/japanese numbering, June 11th 2012.
