Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Radiowave Reactor

2011-09-05 Thread ecat builder
Hey, ecat builder, you wouldn't happen to be a HAM, would you?  Or, do you know one?  Look around your neighborhood for some who has a Rohn 25 tower in their backyard with an antenna which surely isn't seeking My HAM license expired in 2003. And I don't have any easy way to put wires,

Re: [Vo]:RE: Relativistic Casimir Cavities

2011-09-05 Thread Peter Heckert
Hi Frank, I was thinking about this some time ago. I see these problems: When we make the Casimir plates then we must create two surfaces that fit exactly together. This requires energy. There are some simple possibilities: 1) We break a piece of metal and then we have two pieces that fit

[Vo]:A book, thanks Horace

2011-09-05 Thread fznidarsic
Horace, Thank you for you comment about writing a book. I did in 1989, sales were dismal. I don't even get that many hits on me free web page anymore. I wish Jed would do a book on Kendal and let me write a chapter. I know Jones would buy one just to read my stuff. I do have a nice

Re: [Vo]:H2+O2 demonstration

2011-09-05 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote: I hope this improves safety awareness for anyone generating or using hydrogen. Including hearing protectors. T

Re: [Vo]:RE: Relativistic Casimir Cavities

2011-09-05 Thread Horace Heffner
Good question Peter, A possible answer begins on page 7 of: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CasimirGenerator.pdf The lateral forces on capacitor plates is due to fringe fields. The Casimir force is highly non-linear, so fringe forces differ from electrostatic forces, and this

Re: [Vo]:RE: Relativistic Casimir Cavities

2011-09-05 Thread francis
Hi Peter, As with Scott I agree with most of what you said to the extent that you pursued it but disagree with your assumption that I have any interest in a moving plate to derive energy or in Scott's pursuit of a mirror that can absorb energy and then reradiate it unequally in a

Re: [Vo]:RE: Relativistic Casimir Cavities

2011-09-05 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote: Of course it have to be very small. 8) Speaking of small motors: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14763223 T

Re: [Vo]:RE: Relativistic Casimir Cavities

2011-09-05 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 5, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote: Of course it have to be very small. 8) Speaking of small motors: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14763223 T This is cool. Too bad it requires

[Vo]:Why We Crave Creativity but Reject Creative Ideas

2011-09-05 Thread Harry Veeder
Why We Crave Creativity but Reject Creative Ideas ScienceDaily (Sep. 3, 2011) — Most people view creativity as an asset -- until they come across a creative idea. That's because creativity not only reveals new perspectives; it promotes a sense of uncertainty. The next time your great idea at

Re: [Vo]:RE: Relativistic Casimir Cavities

2011-09-05 Thread Horace Heffner
I wrote: The activator could be planar, or cylindrical, or conical, etc., with the stator shaped to mate surfaces. Should have said: The activator surface could be planar, or cylindrical, or conical, etc., with the *rotor* (armature) shaped to mate surfaces. Best regards, Horace

[Vo]:Time-Frame-Based Casimir Effect

2011-09-05 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
Fran, I think this is part of the difference between cavities that exhibit negative internal pressure or positive internal pressure. If we start by assuming that Lorentz Invariance applies to nanocavities then, at first, we expect the same pressure inside the cavity as outside the cavity,