On 12/6/2011 6:02 PM, Alain dit le Cycliste wrote:
from your experience,
what are the relative merit/domain of
- piston/rotative steam engine (like the one people talk here)
Simple, low cost, easy to repair / maintain and can work with the steam
pressure generated by the primary circuit of the
Leif Holmlid
Precision bond lengths for Rydberg Matter clusters Kn (N = 19, 37, 61 and
91)
in excitation levels n = 4 - 8 from rotational radio-frequency emission
spectra
The Rf frequencies involved are less than 100Mhz. certainly within the realm
of the RF generator used in one of
I never said it was 'exotic'.
And I never attempted to explain something as simply claiming it was a
resonant phenomenon.
Stop putting words in my mouth.
This whole discussion started with your statement:
Resonance is very much a part of brute force physics.
In what way? Explain.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I never said it was ‘exotic’…
And I never attempted to explain something as simply claiming it was a
resonant phenomenon…
Stop putting words in my mouth.
This whole discussion started with your
As someone who has worked on, and has a number of patents on Z-Crank type
engines I would not recommend buying one of these green steam engines.
The design/construction appears to emphasise appearance over function and
doesn't look like it will operate reliably for more than 10-100 hours. In
Of course resonance is simple physics, and is the foundation for all
'flavors' of spectroscopies, however, that is NOT what I was referring to
when I used resonance in this statement,
You are reasoning from the physics of brute force, which is all that
nuclear physicists know. The physics of
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I would have thought with my clear statements about using extremely
intense magnetic fields and smashing particles head on at extremely high
velocities, it would have been obvious that I was referring to
We have asked them for their FEA stress analysis data and for how long
they have had an engine running continuously at max load. This company
appears to have licensed the 6 cylinder / 25 HP engine, and have a few
interesting videos: www.steamenginepower.com
Could you have a problem with the 30kWH of excess heat. It seems a bit much
to get rid of for space heating and hot water especially in a suburban
situation.
I was also looking a FIT rate in Australia and it seems you can get money
back from the power company. Could you do this for ecat power?
The Physics of why the e-Cat's Cold Fusion Claims
Collapsehttp://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/12/the_nuclear_physics_of_why_we.php
On 2011-12-06 14:44, Peter Gluck wrote:
http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/12/the_nuclear_physics_of_why_we.php?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScienceblogsChannelEnvironment+%28ScienceBlogs+Channel+%3A+Environment%29
A few good demos could make the skeptics to swallow their poisonous words
and to shut up. I hope eventually these demos will happen. Now I hope they
will happen at Defkalion.
Peter
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
The Physics of why the e-Cat's Cold
Skeptics? Can we please stop calling these people skeptics. I am a skeptic.
This is not skepticism. This is dogmatism. We are the skeptics. We
are skeptical
of official dogma that says that hundreds of scientists are
incompetent, frauds or
self-deluded and that you can't produce energy from
there are interesting theoretical arguments.
If they are right it means that all Ni+H experiments are fraud, not only
e-cat and hyperions.
this is an all or nothing argument, for NiH reactions.
about their (seems good) stellar argument, that nickel cannot transmute to
copper in star for
On Tuesday 12/6/11 Alain wrote [snip] I can add few excuse. -first of all the
current isotopic ration of Ni might be the consequence of an equlibrium
reaction, in a very hot system, under neutron flux...-second, it seems that the
shape of the metal lattice (surface, temperature), and some other
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
A few good demos could make the skeptics to swallow their poisonous words
and to shut up. I hope eventually these demos will happen. Now I hope they
will happen at Defkalion.
Peter
One can be, at the same time,
Is there a connection?
There is a connection.
The purpose of the RF generator is to maintain Rydberg Matter excitation
for as long as possible during the self-sustain mode when the internal
heater is shut down.
During self-sustain mode no additional Rydberg matter is produced by the
internal
I was speaking specifically about the article, its logic is poisonous,
typical post-logical thinking and mixing points of view.
Influential skeptics, on other hand are poisoning the funding sources of
New Energy.
But if you wish, I can retract 'poisonous' I am just writing an essay
about Rossi.
Idea of a cold fusion plant in Massachusetts explored
Italian investor meets with scientists, state officials to pitch
controversial technology
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45557227/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/idea-cold-fusion-plant-massachusetts-explored/#.Tt3c0lbbDRQ
harry
Ethan Siegel is suggesting a rigged power cord to explain the self
sustained heat observation:
In fact, the entire observed effect of having your system continue to
generate heat even after it's been turned off is remarkably simple to rig.
Possible?
rigged power cord: http://db.tt/RFOa0EAa
On
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
But if you wish, I can retract 'poisonous'
Well, it's just that it doesn't fit most skeptical criticism of Rossi any
more than does snake or clown with which Rossi is so fond of labeling
people.
I am just writing an
There are three basic things that must be accomplished to make an E-Cat
design successful.
- High hydrogen packing into nickel nano-powder.
- Strong Coulomb barrier masking.
- Gamma Radiation thermalization, mitigation, and prevention.
Industry standard electrodeposition of Ni
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a connection?
There is a connection.
The purpose of the RF generator is to maintain Rydberg Matter excitation
for as long as possible during the self-sustain mode when the internal
heater is shut down.
Wouldn't
No, that simple scenario is not possible. If you ran the circuit backwards, the
current would not change; if you switched wires the ammeter would read zero,
which it never has (it always showed the current for the controls and/or radio
frequency generator).
Unfortunately, the input power is
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
No, that simple scenario is not possible. If you ran the circuit
backwards, the current would not change; if you switched wires the ammeter
would read zero, which it never has (it always showed the current
At 08:17 AM 12/6/2011, Harry Veeder wrote:
Idea of a cold fusion plant in
Massachusetts explored
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45557227/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/idea-cold-fusion-plant-massachusetts-explored/#.Tt3c0lbbDRQ
Life's little mysteries has been covering Rossi
intermittently,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Some might find this concept creepy.
More like silly -- unless they burn corpses day and night for years,
they're not going to recover very much energy and there are better, cleaner
sources. They shouldn't burn the bodies
At 09:26 AM 12/6/2011, Mary Yugo wrote:They shouldn't burn the bodies --
better to make Soylent Green.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green
The same article also links to :
Eat the Old: Could Mass Cannibalism Solve a Future Food Shortage?
At 08:37 AM 12/6/2011, Mary Yugo wrote:
By the way, the article has an interesting way of cheating the
power-in measurement. See the last figure. I don't think Rossi
does this but I can't rule it out. In the photos, the line cord is
taken apart and the wire being measured looks like it's a
Your suggestion may be possible when a automated fail safe control system
is developed (maybe by National instruments) to provide some sort of
negative feedback control on heat output.
IMHO, until such controls are put in place, a runaway meltdown using the
strategy you suggest is likely at some
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
More like silly -- unless they burn corpses day and night for years, they're
not going to recover very much energy and there are better, cleaner
sources. They shouldn't burn the bodies -- better to make Soylent Green.
And
JC:
Thx for the explanations, relevant or not, however, I still think that the
discussion wandered from my initial point, which was, given proper
conditions, one can disrupt the natural balance within a nucleus and cause
unexpected results using much lower levels of energy by using resonance
At 08:44 AM 12/6/2011, Peter Gluck wrote:
The Physics of why the e-Cat's Cold Fusion Claims Collapse
In addition, the RF would have a near instantaneous effect, whereas Mary's
suggestion would have a very significant time-lag. thus, as Axil pointed
out, a much greater likelihood of runaway.
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 9:36 AM
To:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
In addition, the RF would have a near instantaneous effect, whereas Mary’s
suggestion would have a very significant time-lag… thus, as Axil pointed
out, a much greater likelihood of runaway.
It's doubtful
I suggest that the fact that the current into the resistive heater elements was
measured also eliminates this kind of magic.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 6, 2011 11:38 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a long paper
Authors of the article The Physics of why the e-Cat's Cold Fusion Claims
Collapse :
*Ethan Siegel http://www.facebook.com/people/Ethan-Siegel/1207789153
is a theoretical
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
JC:
Thx for the explanations, relevant or not, however, I still think that the
discussion wandered from my initial point, which was, given proper
conditions, one can disrupt the natural balance within a
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:24 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I suggest that the fact that the current into the resistive heater
elements was measured also eliminates this kind of magic.
I don't believe that was ever done. It probably doesn't matter but if
anyone knows of it
“It's doubtful that Rossi exhibited anything that would have enough RF
power to melt down the core in all the E-cats in the megawatt plant at once.
Where would he store that much power?”
I humbly submit in a simplified example, the RF generator is like an
antenna connected to a radio, but not as
For the simple wire-swap to have occurred, you would really need binary power
states of on and off. In the September and early October tests, as the power
was never zero, you would have to get more creative to explain the non-zero
amperage observed for the power controller and frequency
Mary, there are measurements conducted throughout the test of October 6. See
the attached:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3284962.ece/BINARY/Test+of+E-cat+October+6+%28pdf%29
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
Mary, I seriously doubt that the RF generator is being used for inductive
heating.
We obviously don't have an explanation as to the exact effect the RFG is
having, but if it is having an effect, then it's likely not for direct
heating. a few possibilities are, the 'breathing' that McKubre
Uh, I'm not talking about the E-Cat. I'm talking about a huge industry
with a long history.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There are three basic things that must be accomplished to make an E-Cat
design successful.
- High hydrogen packing into
A Google search for nickel plating comes up with nearly 3 millions
hitshttps://www.google.com/search?gcx=csourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=nickel+plating
.
There is going to be a LOT of codeposition of hydrogen with nickel going on
in the enormous RD base of this enormous industry.
Why hasn't anyone
I've just finished a marathon multi-day session of skimming through the
excellent http://lenr-canr.org
library.
These are really just bookmarks to myself of papers that are worth
reading properly. I restricted myself to about 2005+ ... mainly to
weed out first impressions.
I've tagged most of
On 2011-12-06 20:15, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I've just finished a marathon multi-day session of skimming through the
excellent http://lenr-canr.org http://lenr-canr.org/ library.
Good job, but I'll play the devil's advocate by saying that many of them
are not peer reviewed papers and because
In the W.L. case, I'd like to know where the value for the effective mass
of the electron, above ~2.6, is calculated to be enough for catalyzed
fusion. Also, why does breaking Born Oppenheimer approximation means that
using a perturbative expansion around the W bosons is allowed, given that
its
Something interesting regarding these papers, it is that the researchers
that propose the theories that apparently fits better the experiments
rarely cites each other. It seems there is no serious attempt to come up
with a common basis for the LENR phenomena.
2011/12/6 Daniel Rocha
At 11:47 AM 12/6/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-12-06 20:15, Alan J
Fletcher wrote:
By the way, have you checked if this archive contains things not included
in lenr-canr.org ?
http://www.iscmns.org/library.htm
I didn't have that list. There do seem to be papers not in
Jed's
lenr-canr was
At 11:47 AM 12/6/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Good job, but I'll play the devil's advocate by saying that many of
them are not peer reviewed papers and because of this hard skeptics
would reject them at once.
I was just building a reading list (thanks anyway) ... and did a
coupla-minute skim
JC:
You continue to claim that accelerators use resonance, and therefore that my
comment,
Why does nuclear physics use (BRUTE FORCE) particle accelerators? Because
they are boxed in by the thought that the ONLY way to overcome the coulomb
barrier is extreme force.
is somehow faulty.
You
http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol4.pdf#page=40 2011
has some good papers ... many follow-ons, eg
A. Meulenberg and K.P. Sinha / Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear
Science 4 (2011) 241255
expands on lochons : and p+e in particular.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
The END RESULT is brute force smashing things together… there is NO
resonance in that! That is, and always has been, my point. The actual
interaction of the particles is by brute force, NOT RESONANCE.
At the end of the day, it is quantum mechanics that is the operative
principle behind LENR.
For laymen, quantum mechanics (QM) is very hard to understand; even
Einstein had trouble with it.
Experimenting with QM is even more difficult. If you look at results, they
go away or become invalid.
A. Casali
December 6th, 2011 at 7:09 AM
5) Considering the importance of university RD for the acceptance of your
technology in terms of certification and authorisations, not to speek about the
performance improvements that they may bring to your great invention, why are
you still holding on
This just in from the Institute of Schadenfreude Studies:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/eight-ferraris-crash-at-gathering-of-narcissists-in-japan/2011/12/05/gIQAmyS9XO_story.html
Dec. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Eight Ferraris and a Lamborghini were part of a
14-car crash in Japan yesterday that
Why do you think the university project has been cancelled? I do not see
that in Rossi's response.
- Jed
Here is a comment from Lewan Mats about this topic:
Hi Mary and Ahsoka,
Saw your discussion about power cords on Vortex. You can rule them out.
I made my own connection cord which I put in series, both at the main power
supply and between the blue control box and the resistor in the Ecat.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
For laymen, quantum mechanics (QM) is very hard to understand; even
Einstein had trouble with it.
Einstein had objections to its implications and apparent incompleteness. He
was completely comfortable with how it was used to
The is some finite chance that the inner workings of the Rossi reactor are
now classified as SERET by the US military and not subject to review.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you think the university project has been cancelled? I do not see
Obvisuly Univerty RD is not a priority for Rossi.
Since it’s not a priority at all, i expect more delays.
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 10:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Rossi] University RD has gone away?
Why do you think the university project has been
Collisions can be resonant too.
Please explain.
-Mark
From: Joshua Cude [mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:01 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
** **
“Collisions can be resonant too…”
** **
Please explain…
**
Here's an abstract from PRL, which I found with 10 seconds of google. Have
you heard of it?
Resonant collisional energy
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The is some finite chance that the inner workings of the Rossi reactor are
now classified as SERET by the US military and not subject to review.
The U.S. military has no authority in Europe.
- Jed
US is not the world.
2011/12/6 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
The is some finite chance that the inner workings of the Rossi reactor are
now classified as SERET by the US military and not subject to review.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Why do you
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
For Jed Rothwell: a quick suggestion. I think it would be useful a more
detailed indexing/search system for lenr-canr.org, for example:
- Sorting the archive by the original document date (not publication date
on lenr-canr.org)
- Options for
At 12:42 PM 12/6/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol4.pdf#page=40 2011
has some good papers ... many follow-ons, eg
A. Meulenberg and K.P. Sinha / Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear
Science 4 (2011) 241255
expands on lochons : and p+e in particular.
Adding --
Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol4.pdf#page=40 2011 has some good
papers ... many follow-ons, eg
A. Meulenberg and K.P. Sinha / Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear
Science 4 (2011) 241--255
There is a copy here, in case you have trouble downloading the ISCMNS
http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol5.pdf
Pretty much a special issue on :
P.L. Hagelstein and I.U. Chaudhary / Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear
Science 5 (2011) 52-71
Energy Exchange In The Lossy Spin-Boson Model
(and their reviewer wanted more!)
Nope, let me look into it... thx.
-Mark
From: Joshua Cude [mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:29 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Mark
Darn. Between the vagaries of the gmail system and Vortex, half the time I
can end up responding to the wrong people. Seems I did respond only to
Mats to what was a personal email to me and a few others and which Jed
posted on Vort. OK. So here is my reply, now public (sorry I got confused
--
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Also how you feel about the lack of a blank/calibration run ahead of the
test, using the electrical heater as a calibrating energy source before
hydrogen was added to the E-cat. Wouldn't that rule out such issues as
thermocouple placement?
The best way
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Nope, let me look into it... thx.
I meant google. Have you heard of google.
Don't bother looking in to the particular resonant collisions. It's just an
example of where collision energy can be tailored
On 12/6/2011 10:22 PM, Colin Hercus wrote:
Could you have a problem with the 30kWH of excess heat. It seems a bit
much to get rid of for space heating and hot water especially in a
suburban situation.
The Hyperion unit has 9 cores and can dynamically stage them as required
by the load. 30 kWs
“Einstein had objections to its implications and apparent incompleteness.
He was completely comfortable with how it was used to make successful
predictions.”
I mean “Einstein had trouble with it” in the following sense:
Einstein was very unhappy about this apparent randomness in nature that QM
This appears to be the Houkes data that you're referring to:
http://lenr-canr.org/RossiData/Houkes%20Oct%206%20Calculation%20of%20influence%20of%20Tin%20on%20Tout.xlsx
I cannot open this file. I get a zip with dissociated .xml's.
I know that I'd quickly discounted it in the past, as it
An ongoing argument here is about the adequacy of the inspection done on the
device of October 6.
Another good question: why was used so little water flux? Why not redurece the
water flux and get 30-40 degrees Celsiusof difference instead of 4-5 degrees?
From: Mary Yugo
Sent: Tuesday,
But, I must say that your allusion to
the fact that two calorimetric methods were in reasonable agreement
is just hogwash. The secondary calorimetric observations cited previously were
entirely contingent upon the acceptance of the first. This is a circular
argument.
From:
Correction: why was used so much water flux.
From: Mattia Rizzi
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 11:51 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: a long paper about and mainly against the E-cat
An ongoing argument here is about the adequacy of the inspection done on the
device of October 6.
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
This appears to be the Houkes data that you're referring to:
http://lenr-canr.org/RossiData/Houkes%20Oct%206%20Calculation%20of%20influence%20of%20Tin%20on%20Tout.xlsx
I cannot open this file. I get a zip with dissociated .xml's.
I know
Here is a version of Houkes in Acrobat format. This has some problems:
http://lenr-canr.org/RossiData/Houkes%20Oct%206%20Calculation%20of%20influence%20of%20Tin%20on%20Tout.pdf
The original in Excel format is better:
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Another good question: why was used so [high] water flux? Why not reduce
the water flux and get 30-40 degrees Celsiusof difference instead of 4-5
degrees?
Two reasons, I think:
1. Safety. You want to be sure the heat will be removed even if it
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
“QM is the most predictive theory over the widest range of dimensions in
history. It has certain odd implications, but in its simple application as
tool to predict the outcome of experiments, it is perfectly well understood
. Safety. You want to be sure the heat will be removed even if it increases a
great deal, the way it did on Feb. 10.
Please, Jed, dont’t kidding.
Rossi used steam for heat removing in January,March,etc and you know that steam
carry out very little heat compared with liquid water. You cannot
Most people don’t measure “black-boxes”.
Correction: Most people don’t measure “black-boxes” with instrumentation by the
invetor, placed by the inventor.
From: Mattia Rizzi
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:35 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: a long paper about and mainly against
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Safety. You want to be sure the heat will be removed even if it
increases a great deal, the way it did on Feb. 10.
Ah. The favorite excuse, second only to secret sauce.
But the heat exchanger had no effect on the
Thanks for converting the file. It may have been saved in Excel 2007 without
compatible mode.
As to the methods you discuss:
Method 1 is great if you can trust the power in, secondary flow rate, and the
thermocouple readings. - Even though the power in was only spot-checked, I feel
good about
I bet you crack yourself up, don't you.
Darn, I've already wasted the time. but fortunately I've already found some
interesting abstracts that mention drastic changes in branching ratios and
enhanced energy transfer in resonant or near-resonant systems. which was my
point.
-Mark
From:
There's a summary (2007) at :
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/HowColdFusionWorks.php
Covers some of the (ideas in) papers in my list.
I can not believe this, the loss of food growing rights, is happening
in a democracy:
http://nzfoodsecurity.org/
The only ways to end this kind of thing I know of is a single term
limit, government funded elections, and eliminating lobbyists.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Most people don’t measure “black-boxes”. If Rossi provided a 30-40 degrees
difference, everybody can feel it simply touching water in exit. With 4-5
degrees not.
Everyone present at the demo could -- and did -- feel the reactor itself,
which
From NextBigFuture:
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/12/brian-ahern-will-not-be-presenting-on.html
This is unexpected. Does anybody know why Dr. Brian Ahern won't be
presenting his findings on LENR tomorrow as originally planned?
Cheers,
S.A.
Cook's Lattice model of the nucleus seems to be getting a bit of traction
(what, 35 years on?)
another pdf ...
http://iccf15.frascati.enea.it/ICCF15-PRESENTATIONS/S8_O2_Cook.pdf
Essay :
http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Cook_FQXiEssayNDCook_2.pdf
(Or maybe if you google nucleus
At 04:43 PM 12/6/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
This is unexpected. Does anybody
know why Dr. Brian Ahern won't be presenting his findings on LENR
tomorrow as originally planned?
A comment on that page -- nextbigfuture (site owner)
Apparently the organizer has said things and posted articles
His work was done under an EPRI contract.
AFAIK - the funders have not released it to the public yet.
-Original Message-
From: Akira Shirakawa
From NextBigFuture:
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/12/brian-ahern-will-not-be-presenting-on.html
This is unexpected. Does anybody know why
In reply to Aussie Guy E-Cat's message of Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:20:00 +1030:
Hi,
[snip]
Aussie FITs require the grid to be fed via a grid connect inverter and
the inverter fed by a Renewable energy source. I doubt LENR would
qualify.
If you get a system working, then I think you should request
In reply to James Bowery's message of Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:01:10 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
Why hasn't anyone notice excess heat?
At a guess I would say there are two reasons.
1) There isn't much.
2) No one measures it, they just get rid of it.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
Larsen starts talking at 3:20: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVRLcC21F14
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 15:27 -0900, Horace Heffner wrote:
The only ways to end this kind of thing I know of is a single term
limit, government funded elections, and eliminating lobbyists.
So you want the government to fund only its own authorized candidates in
its own election? And you don't
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
