So, you admit to having NOT read CE web site and a more thorough explanation
of his theory. So, you do not really understand what his theory is;
YET, you mouth off as if you're the expert. Your verbal diarrhea is full of
irrelevancy and useless comments that make you feel you know it know.
Meanwhile,
Back in the Florida swamps LENR pioneer
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.i-b-r.org/NeutronSynthesis.pdfsa=Uei=nv4tUKGVHKSgywHMqYHQDwved=0CBkQFjACsig2=2jnJ7E68bs8RTEvQ80nLXAusg=AFQjCNHrasQAwAaBEkfYm1IQ61UuUIym_g
gets rich via NASDAQ
Yes,
Looks like http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg69031.html
says it all. I detect the wisdom of Gulinski theories in this enlightened
atmosphere.
Love,
Candy
- Original Message -
From: Te Chung
Sent: 08/17/12 04:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
Technically, not a LED:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED
seems to meet your description 'cept for the intensity.
T
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
On the left is a reservoir at ambient temperature and pressure which is
connected to a vacuum chamber on the right through a nozzle hole. The gases
expand into the chamber through this hole and during this expansion all the
Brian,
I agree with most of that statement. I believe Nature keeps them as far
away from life as possible, locked into large black holes in the vacuum of
space, possibly within stars corona's and on earth gravity should act on
them over time as they make their way to the core. These are all
http://www.ias.ac.in/resonance/December2009/p1210-1222.pdf
Molecule Matters van derWaalsMolecules
See: page 1214
4.1 Supersonic Molecular Beams
Cheers: Axil
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:07 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Axil Axil
Slide 16 Takahashi and Kitamura (thanks Akira, Jed et al)
https://decibel.ni.com/content/servlet/JiveServlet/download/23750-1-51320/TS
9240%20Status%20of%20CMN%20CF%20LENR%20Research.pdf
Summary: Ni-Cu on zirconia support, long period of gain, hydrogen and
deuterium compared for gain.
1)
Celani is gives up to 70W/g...
2012/8/17 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Slide 16 Takahashi and Kitamura (thanks Akira, Jed et al)
https://decibel.ni.com/content/servlet/JiveServlet/download/23750-1-51320/TS
9240%20Status%20of%20CMN%20CF%20LENR%20Research.pdf
Summary: Ni-Cu on zirconia
Does this discovery lend credibility to Rossi with his Hydrogen Nickel (and
apparently some Copper) reactor?
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:29 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Stunning slide from Technova
According to Piantelli and to Defkalion. Ni does not work at all with
deuterium, Why it works (?) here is a good/bad question.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Slide 16 Takahashi and Kitamura (thanks Akira, Jed et al)
On 2012-08-17 16:43, Peter Gluck wrote:
According to Piantelli and to Defkalion. Ni does not work at all with
deuterium, Why it works (?) here is a good/bad question.
Celani reported strange results with Deuterium too (with his treated
nanostructured ISOTAN44 wires). It works, but poorly
OK, so if I understand you correctly, since (as your cite states) this
supersonic cooling occurs in all gasses (not just xenon), the magic of
xenon really boils down to two things:
1) The way it ionizes.
2) Its tendency to form van der Waals molecules.
Is that correct?
Another question:
You
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro
Does this discovery lend credibility to Rossi with his Hydrogen Nickel
(and
apparently some Copper) reactor?
Has Rossi ever admitted to using copper as an alloy in his design ?
Apparently, in the sample tested by the Swedes, AR's ploy was to let
Terry,
What about being able to change the color (frequency) of the emitted photons
after the chip has been made? I need to clear this up, but the inventor
said that the color could be changed, from IR, thru the visible and into the
UV by just reprogramming. I scanned the OLED wiki but did not
I think AR is smarter than this.
He said Ni+p - Cu when it knew it was not the case. With this statement, he
was sure that Cu will not be taken as a potential catalyst and only a
by-product.
I think also that Cu isn't the only catalyst for the reaction. There is
still some more to be discovered.
Thanks for interperting this for me. I can follow only a small part of that
presentation. How I wish I had a wordy interpretation for each slide.
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 7:29 AM
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud Kodeck
With Celani, the experiment shown at ICCF-17 reaches around 3W/cm² which
is
very good in itself but not enough for a commercial product.
Why do you say that 3W/cm² is not enough for a commercial product ? We are
talking about an alloy that
You should think about the total volume (area is a rule of a thumb
anyway...) because it should be possible to roll all that. It gives around
450W/cm3. Also, that gives an average of 50W/g, using his wires. So, 20Kg
should give you 1MW of extra heat...
2012/8/17 Kelley Trezise
On 2012-08-17 17:14, Jones Beene wrote:
gain, anyway. I think AR has seen minor gain perhaps COP=2, and that he used
copper to get it, perhaps inadvertently from the copper-alloy plumbing. But
that is a guess.
If Rossi's magic powder works as Celani's treated ISOTAN44 wires
(positive feedback
On 2012-08-17 17:43, Jones Beene wrote:
Why do you say that 3W/cm² is not enough for a commercial product ? We are
talking about an alloy that costs only $20/kg (US) in large volume lots.
The treatment (not known in detail yet - but Celani said a paper about
it is in preparation) to create
Beware that the extra heat/g. And that's the up limit. Generally, it's
around 40W/g and 50/g. You'd have to use some complicated scheme to get an
electrical feedback and self sustain.
2012/8/17 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
On 2012-08-17 17:14, Jones Beene wrote:
gain, anyway. I
--- On Fri, 8/17/12, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Magic of Xenon
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Friday, August 17, 2012, 10:26 AM
http://www.ias.ac.in/resonance/December2009/p1210-1222.pdfMolecule Matters van
derWaalsMoleculesSee:
Nickel cited previously several times.
Example:
AnonymousDecember 18, 2011 12:42 PM
http://opensourcenuclearfuel.blogspot.com/2011/11/possible-activator-for-gas-loaded-lenr.html?showComment=1324240950625#c4302940741857909284
Used LiH from
On 2012-08-17 18:03, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Beware that the extra heat/g. And that's the up limit. Generally, it's
around 40W/g and 50/g. You'd have to use some complicated scheme to get
an electrical feedback and self sustain.
True, actual average values for Celani are smaller at the moment. My
Akira,
According to my theory, at the moment the hydrogen collapses in a void or
crack (singularity), you should get an instant burst of low level Hawking
Radiation(full spectrum) since quantum singularities are very hot to start
with and they will immediately evaporate matter down near local
I didn't mean electric circuit, but feedback scheme in general. Maybe
heating only won't work...
2012/8/17 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
I don't think a complex electrical feedback is really needed for that.
Celani showed that his treated wires generate excess heat when heated
Further on this point (with some rewording):
IMPLICATION - there are 20+ years of positive experiments
with palladium-deuterium, most of them using hydrogen as a control. Hydrogen
does not seem to work at all in pure palladium. If H worked at all, then the
thermal gain with D is
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:56 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Uncertainty.
My mind is obviously filled with singularities.
T
For 1 MW, the surface needed shall be 33 cm² ... 33 m². With a thickness
of 100 µm, we arrive at 3.3 dm³. It's not costly indeed for the benefit it
has.
I'm more worried about structural body, loss heat, and control it will imply
with such lower power density. That's engineering.
Pardon for this very late postscript, time is hard to find.
I believe you assume a wave function totally confined in all 3-dimensions.
This is probably not what was intended. It is easy to find papers
describing crystal/lattice channel conduction of much higher energy
particles (electrons,
Color change is cutting edge:
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/07/researchers-pave-way-for-much-brighter-oleds/
T
Or, they are two totally different, unrelated reactions.
T
Are you certain or uncertain?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:56 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Uncertainty.
My mind is obviously filled with singularities.
T
Thanks for finding that Terry... still seems as if color change for
semiconductor-based light generation is still 'in the lab'. That's good
news!
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:15 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Pardon if I missed this in the deluge of recent postings
ICCF-17 Presentation -
Surface Effect for Gas Loading Micrograin Palladium for Low Energy
Nuclear Reactions LENR
- Heinrich Hora1, George H Miley, Mark Prelas, Kyu Jung Kim, Xiaoling Yang
According to my theory these devices magnify the Heisenburg Uncertainty
Principal by design (the larger the singularities or the more of them are
created, the more uncertainty there is). Which, as you said and I agree is
not good for life. Actually it is probably more of a love/hate
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:35 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you certain or uncertain?
I can't decide.
Specifically, RF causes excitation of the noble gas which increases the
general polarization profile of the atoms of the noble gas. Polarization
causes the dimmers to form as the noble gas atoms tend to stick together in
response to increasing dipole-dipole interaction.
In addition, increased
I believe that this is how helium is liquefied.* *
**
Cheers: Axil
**
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Harvey Norris harv...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On *Fri, 8/17/12, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Magic of Xenon
To:
At 10:24 PM 8/16/2012, you wrote:
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
Jed just informed me that it's okay to open this one:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SOA7Z4aIGnT_HrshnzNF6vTsgj4PULTBceDyUINIZG8/edit
They quietly endorse Widom-Larsen :
A Hamiltonian with ⥠782keV can
Any upset to the thermodynamic or spatial equilibrium of a micro
singularity(collapsed matter), once formed, will trigger an instant
response Once a singularity is present within matter, they take in matter
and energy in and return radiation out. The collapse of matter and/or
radiation can trigger
Can a cold neutron capture reaction create a temperature inversion like an
inhaling singularity can?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 10:24 PM 8/16/2012, you wrote:
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
Jed just informed me that it's okay
At 11:17 PM 8/16/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
I am putting two and two together here. The Papp engine ash was a
brown powder.
Thanks for letting us know that this was your speculation, not a
conclusion from strong evidence.
J Ronner talks about a two helium atom fusion process.
And what J
At 01:17 PM 8/17/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 10:24 PM 8/16/2012, you wrote:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SOA7Z4aIGnT_HrshnzNF6vTsgj4PULTBceDyUINIZG8/edit
They quietly endorse Widom-Larsen :
A Hamiltonian with ⥠782keV can cause a
proton to capture an electron to yield
Q.E.D.
At 01:54 AM 8/17/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
So, you admit to having NOT read CE web site and a more thorough
explanation of his theory.
Yes. Generally, I admit the truth, regardless of how it might look.
Basically, I trust the truth more than I trust myself.
So, you do not really
At 01:17 PM 8/17/2012, you wrote:
They quietly endorse Widom-Larsen :
Unreadable for me. Krivit is making a Big Deal out of this
presentation, and McKubre's co-authorship. I rather doubt that
McKubre has reversed his position on neutrons. It is not clear at
all that co-authorship represents
At 01:17 PM 8/17/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Unreadable for me.
Full paper :
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Godes-Controlled-Electron-Capture-Paper.pdf
Appendix A just lists a bunch of reactions ... with NO direct
reference to WL (may be in the other Godes
If you just sell plans for poppers, electronic circuit boards and licenses
for the technology, then all of the liability rests with the OEM's they
drag in. They probably give them a short demo in the shop before the thing
malfunctions. I notice everytime I see a demo it is behind explosion proof
In a post today integral sited a death of a LENR developer in an explosion.
The take away, LENR is dangerous when the power is high. It is best to be
as safe as you can.
Axil
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:11 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
If you just sell plans for poppers,
LOL... This made my day. The self proclaimed LENR/Cold Fusion expert does
not even have a degree in the sciences, let alone in physics, where he
proclaims himself to be an expert.
Why do you consider yourself to be an expert without a degree? So taking
one freshman class under Feynman
Yes, singularities may belch out radiation like x-rays and gammas, but will it
pruduce neutrons? I don't believe so. Can your theory explain this flux of
neutrons?
Neutrons has got to be coming from some sort of fusion going on. Being not an
expert, someone correct me if I'm wrong on this.
wasn't A123 the builder of efficient LiFePO4 accumulators, good candidate
for rough accumulators, less dangerous (don't explode, or burn), near as
efficient, especially on duration...
I don't understand why LiFePO4 does not get success. it is easy technology,
easier to use than LiPoly or LiIon+Co
On 2012-08-17 20:39, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Absolute confirmation of Nuclear Fusion from deuterated titanium using shock
procedure
- Mark Prelas: 62Million Neutrons within 5 minutes -- Fully reproducible
I'm not a theoretician (so please correct me if I'm wrong), but isn't
this *not*
Neutrons are hard to shield and when absorbed can produce radioactive
materials. Could this be a potentially killer blow to otherwise safe LENR?
Fission reactors typically create up to 10^13 neutrons per cm² per second,
and this experiment was only making about 20 per s, over (I assume) the
Jojo,
My singularity will rip matter apart in the near vacinity. Any neutrons
that escape it will be very low momentum, since the singularities quantum
gravity pull sucked all of the energy out of them. It also devours them.
I am thinking about a new newsgroup for Evaporative Matter Nuclear
Feed yor gremlin a steady diet of hydrogen without any powder and you will
not get neutrons. This thing is ripping atoms apart
On Friday, August 17, 2012, Robert Lynn wrote:
Neutrons are hard to shield and when absorbed can produce radioactive
materials. Could this be a potentially killer
I am pleased to draw your attention to this opinion from the experimenter.
The presentation states:
Based on solid experiment of neutron emission and LENR-element generation:
hypothetical models:
Reactions in 2 pm distance due to *Coulomb screening* by factor 13 (5 for
hot plasmas).
Coulomb
It gets even better. Many of my most favored words are in the
description.asfollows:
*Clusters* of 156 deuterons (10pm diameter) in *non-localized Bose-Einstein*
* *state react with Pd
nucleus (or as *inverted Rydberg state*) for element production via *compound
nucleus *element with A
= 306
Somebody correct me, but wouldn't Very Low Momemtum Neutrons be undetectable?
I guess we need to see this paper to ascertain what energy neutrons they
detected.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: ChemE Stewart
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:44 AM
Axil, where's the paper? Did you forget to link it?
I'd be interested in looking at this more closely.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 6:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miley, et al - 62M Neutrons within 5 minutes
Hello Akira,
It's important that the results are reported to be reproducible.
If they are correct, they are very complex multibody reactions,
e.g., slide #12 -
Clusters of 156 deuterons (10pm diameter) in non-localized Bose-Einstein
state react with Pd nucleus (or as inverted Rydberg state)
6.2*10^7 neutrons per 5 min means 200 thousand neutrons per second. If each
one carries 1MeV, that means 3*10^-10^-8J. There's about 3*10^7s every
year, which means about 1Joule of radiation emitted per year.
According to wikipedia:
The International Commission on Radiological
Hi JoJo
It is found at the top of this thread, but here it is for you.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWSPROFESSORS/pdf/LENR%20Korea%20ICCF-17%20Poster.pdf
Axil
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
**
Axil, where's the paper? Did you forget
Well, Daniel
If those neutrons are real, they would still be welcome news.
Hopefully, the reaction could be modulated to reduce emissions, or their
energies.
-- LP
Daniel Rocha wrote;
6.2*10^7 neutrons per 5 min means 200 thousand neutrons per second. If
each
one carries 1MeV, that means
It is interesting that they claim element generation up to lead. That also
happened in defkalion's data. Check that out.
2012/8/17 pagnu...@htdconnect.com
Well, Daniel
If those neutrons are real, they would still be welcome news.
Hopefully, the reaction could be modulated to reduce
The hot fusion people and the nuclear physicist crowd will not believe that
LENR is real unless they see lots of neutrons; this is a good political
type experiment.
Axil
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:06 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Well, Daniel
If those neutrons are real, they would still
But that is sort of bad news too. People won't be able to have these
devices at home. It seems that there are bursts of high activity 1000x
above the high limit level is way too dangerous.
2012/8/17 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
The hot fusion people and the nuclear physicist crowd will not
On 2012-08-18 01:11, Axil Axil wrote:
The hot fusion people and the nuclear physicist crowd will not believe
that LENR is real unless they see lots of neutrons; this is a good
political type experiment.
I have to bring some potentially bad news. I've just been told that this
Ti-D neutron
Within the last few hours.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17.shtml
Jeff
Krivit, sorry. Sheesh.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
Within the last few hours.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17.shtml
Jeff
Not really bad news. Ed Storms came up with a theory that fusion happen in
cracks of the lattice. Summing that, with what I see in the slides, they
are thinking that a BEC of D is forced to be fused by the fractures. So,
LENR is a kind of variation of fractofusion.
2012/8/17 Akira Shirakawa
The production of neutrons may well be avoidable if the reaction is
properly designed. As a model, Rossi has been purifying his reaction for
more than a year. My guess is that the use of Deuterium is conducive to
neutron production. If the deuterium ion enters into the nucleus of the
substrate
On 8/17/12 4:32 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Not really bad news. Ed Storms came up with a theory that fusion
happen in cracks of the lattice. Summing that, with what I see in the
slides, they are thinking that a BEC of D is forced to be fused by the
fractures. So, LENR is a kind of variation of
You are believing in all he says. He may only be partially right since LENR
could well have several different stages. So, he could be right up to a
point, but not right about everything.
2012/8/17 Ruby r...@hush.com
Holy moly, what's happening to me?
Ruby
--
Ruby Carat
On 8/17/12 4:59 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
You are believing in all he says. He may only be partially right since
LENR could well have several different stages. So, he could be right
up to a point, but not right about everything.
I had hoped I was describing faithfully what *his* claims are.
You asked what was happening to you...
2012/8/17 Ruby r...@hush.com
On 8/17/12 4:59 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
You are believing in all he says. He may only be partially right since
LENR could well have several different stages. So, he could be right up to
a point, but not right about
Widom Larsen postulate that the neutrons are produced when a proton
captures an electron. The process is endothermic (energy must be supplied
or it will not occur) so the neutrons initially have extremely low energy
(cold). As a result they are nearly stationary and don't leave the
material. Also
In the other thread there is a comment to the effect that this is a
small-scale hot fusion effect (fractofusion). My comments would not
apply. Part of the complexity of the field is that there isn't just one
LENR; there are apparently a whole bunch of different phenomena requiring
distinct
All of the pre-prints were distributed on a flash card. I will upload them
when I return. Krivit has already done so, I see.
I don't see why you say sheesh about him. He is being helpful.
Krivit did not attend the conference.
This was a well organized conference. The organizers demanded that
Several experts in calorimetry expressed doubts about the Celani
demonstration at ICCF17. Mike McKubre in particular feels that it is
impossible to judge whether it really produced heat or not, because the
method is poor. He does not say he is sure there was no heat; he simply
does not know.
In reply to pagnu...@htdconnect.com's message of Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:11:31
-0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Pardon for this very late postscript, time is hard to find.
I believe you assume a wave function totally confined in all 3-dimensions.
This is probably not what was intended. It is easy to find
In reply to Jeff Berkowitz's message of Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:28:04 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Widom Larsen postulate that the neutrons are produced when a proton
captures an electron. The process is endothermic (energy must be supplied
or it will not occur) so the neutrons initially have extremely low
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:35 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you certain or uncertain?
I can't decide.
certainly undecided
harry
10x gasoline. 1 or 2 weeks would be 10,000. The upper limit for fusion in
general is around 200.000. 6 months of operation (sounds like Rossi...).
2012/8/17 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
He has run it for as long as a month, so a 1 or 2 week self-sustaining run
should not be a problem.
If it involves a shock procedure it sounds similiar to the
piezonuclear systems studied by Cardone et al
and they too obeserved neutrons.
Piezonuclear neutrons from fracturing of inert solids
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0903/0903.3104.pdf
(This was published in Physics Letters A)
Harry
On
On 2012-08-18 02:53, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Celani hopes to run it in self-sustaining mode with better insulation.
That will put to rest all questions about calorimetry. He hopes to do
this as quickly as 2 weeks from now! More power to him.
Given the interest this device generated it would be
If the neutrons could be collimated they could be used in neutron
scattering experiments.
Harry
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:06 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Well, Daniel
If those neutrons are real, they would still be welcome news.
Hopefully, the reaction could be modulated to reduce
He told something nice. ICCF 18 will be in Missouri... Well, I didn't know
that...
2012/8/17 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
All of the pre-prints were distributed on a flash card. I will upload them
when I return. Krivit has already done so, I see.
I don't see why you say sheesh about
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:57 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to pagnu...@htdconnect.com's message of Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:11:31
-0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Pardon for this very late postscript, time is hard to find.
I believe you assume a wave function totally confined in all
From those numbers (30°C room, 120°C at 48W and 140°C when LENR active) I
calculate 16W excess if you assume all radiative heat transfer. But it
will actually be slightly less than that because the hotter tube surface
will convect heat away at a rate that is roughly proportional to the air to
Hello Harry,
You asked --
So, the measuring instrument itself will produce energy, if it is used
to precisely measure the energy of a particle?
Probably not.
But maybe there are subtleties that obey the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics,
but allow for some counterintuitive effects. For example, refer
Isn't 23 years of torture enough?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Several experts in calorimetry expressed doubts about the Celani
demonstration at ICCF17. Mike McKubre in particular feels that it is
impossible to judge whether it really produced
From: Robert Lynn
[snip] Add that 25.2 to the 36.7 and subtract 48 input and you get 14W
excess.. I think you can pretty confidently state that it is over 10W.
Nice work. Thanks.
Is there any way to guesstimate - assuming the best reasonable kind of
insulation is added to
Ruby,
More important than whether there is a difference between LENR and
fractofusion are the questions -
- Have Miley, et al, produced more energy than other fractofusion results?
- Can the effect be scaled up beyond what fractofusion attained to date?
- Are the transmutations real and
That death was from a chemical explosion. SRI, recombiner gunked up,
researcher picked up the cell, gunk fell off, fast recomb,. Bang! He
died, McKubre still has glass in him. As I recall reading. Closed
cells are dangerous. LENR *could* be dangerous. Unreliable can cut
both ways.
Sent
NUCLEAR BATTERY USING D-CLUSTERS IN NANO-MATERIALS --- PLUS SOME COMMENTS
ABOUT PRIOR ABOUT PRIOR H2-Ni POWER CELL STUDIES
- George H. Miley, Xiaoling. Yang, Heinrich Hora
http://www.slideshare.net/ssusereeef70/nuclear-battery-using-clusters-in-nanomaterials
This comment has apparently turned out to be astute ...
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
If it involves a shock procedure it sounds similiar to the
piezonuclear systems studied by Cardone et al
and they too obeserved neutrons.
Piezonuclear neutrons
The sheesh was because in my original mail, I spelled his name wrong.
Which seemed rude when I realized I had done it. I was not intending to say
anything about content with the sheesh.
Jeff
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
All of the pre-prints were
Good calorimetry is difficult, but comparisons are not. Wouldn't it be
sufficient to demonstrate two parallel implementations, one with an
unprocessed CONSTANTAN wire and no H2, one with a processed wire and H2,
and measure the difference using the same approach?
Why do I even have to pose this
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
