Rossi, at the end of his taxi talk with Sterling Allen, said that the
eCat is too risky to invest in *YET*!
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2012 8:11:02 PM
Nicely done:
Half of my brain thinks that this is brilliant and just what is needed,
and the other half thinks that it is not.
From my personal experience the problem is not so much a conspiracy as
people, such as scientists in universities who do know something about
this stuff, having read about this in
Andrea Rossi
September 17th, 2012 at 7:02 AM
DEAR GIO:
I WANT TO ADD THAT SO FAR THE MEASUREMENTS MADE BY NEW SYSTEMS HAVE
CONFIRMED, SUBSTANTIALLY, THE DATA PRESENTED IN THE REPORT OF ZURICH. IN
PARTICULAR: WE HAVE ELIMINATED THE INTERNAL CYLINDER, TO MAKE EASIER THE
MEASUREMENT OF THE
The art of rehtoric
http://youtu.be/2q4_M3J-N3o
Ethos, Logos, Pathos
Harry
A video like this only raises awareness. It gets people thinking that is all.
harry
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Nigel Dyer l...@thedyers.org.uk wrote:
Half of my brain thinks that this is brilliant and just what is needed, and
the other half thinks that it is not.
From my personal
yw
harry
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
Thanks for this Harry. I put it up on our front page.
Jammin great find!
On 9/16/12 2:37 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
FREE ENERGY - LUMINARIES ft. Aishah [ELEVATE SOLUTION SERIES]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2l5Z9T_x8A
...and that should be enough to expect from such video.
harry
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
A video like this only raises awareness. It gets people thinking that is all.
harry
See:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-b61-bomb-a-case-study-in-needs-and-costs/2012/09/16/494aff00-f831-11e1-8253-3f495ae70650_story.html?hpid=z1
This article has a surprising amount of technical detail, and some close up
photos of a 50-year-old bomb and the components
unsubscribe
I've shown my open letter,
at least the first paragraph shoul raise doubt... seing National
instruments behavior...
but it did nothing...
no limit to self delusion.
2012/9/17 Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
A video like this only raises awareness. It gets people thinking that is
all.
harry
At 12:39 AM 9/17/2012, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Abd ul-Rahman
Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
You can play with ideas all you want. The
information in the subject article from
Defkalion is primitive, it's hard to tell what
it means.
At 12:50 AM 9/17/2012, Alan Fletcher wrote:
It's also interesting that he's down-playing the applications of the
eCat -- he's already said that its use in cars is decades away, and
aircraft, never (despite NASA/Boeing penciling it in on a 15-year time frame).
That study has been given way
At 04:27 AM 9/17/2012, Nigel Dyer wrote:
From my personal experience the problem is not so much a conspiracy
as people, such as scientists in universities who do know something
about this stuff, having read about this in the past, decided from
the evidence then that there was nothing in it,
I am just beginning to take a closer look at the paper presented by Celani at
the recent conference http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnalloa.pdf and
an unusual behavior appears that I would like to have explained. The first
major calibration curve on page 26 seems like an excellent one
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
The back side tracks could only be caused by neutrons, basically. And a
gold cathode, from their work, produces a lot more neutrons.
This is very interesting.
You need to understand that the limit is not
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
The study was a bit naive. It seems to assume that reality will
automatically mean that engineering is possible.
Assuming the high power reported by Rossi, Celani and others is real, that
proves beyond doubt it is possible to engineer a
I have a question about fission that someone here, perhaps Robin, might be
able to address.
Suppose you have 90-TH-232(P,F)51-SB-128. EXFOR does not appear to make it
straightforward to determine the products apart from antimony. What I'm
wondering is how much I can infer from the shorthand
I don't have an issue with the MM experiment disproving any etheric bias in
a SPATIAL direction but think Lorentzian contraction and time dilation are
evidence of an etheric river of virtual particles intersecting our 3d plane
from a perpendicular dimension at a velocity we as chalkboard figures
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:08:52 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I don't think you can fission 232Th with a slow proton. My reasoning is as
follows.
1) A neutron is 782 keV heavier than a proton (and hence lends more energy to
the reaction).
2) A neutron slow neutron won't do
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:40 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However if just want a list of potential reactions ;) (Most energetic are
near
the bottom of the list).
That must be from the output of your program that I can't run because I
have an old Mac. :) Which of any of the reactions would
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:40 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However if just want a list of potential reactions ;) (Most energetic are
near
the bottom of the list).
That must be from the output of your program that I
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:56:55 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:40 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However if just want a list of potential reactions ;) (Most energetic are
near
the bottom of the list).
That must be from the output of your program
22 matches
Mail list logo
