David,
The paper mentioned by Lou is excellent for further consideration on this
forum, despite its title. It represents the best way to achieve OU without
an energy sink, or without nuclear energy. This is on the horizon actually
but on a small scale (watt level).
Perhaps 'Information
On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013, at 8:20 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Storms: NO!!! That is not
Axil, your description does not fit what is observed or even what is
generally accepted.
I'm trying to get you to understand the basic difference between cold
fusion and hot fusion. It would help if you read papers that describe
what is observed rather than speculate based on imagination.
As with any significant and potentially profitable new technology, there is a
storm of treachery, theft, false claims and injustice surrounding it. The
Daguerreotype is a prime example. Francois Arago, president of the French
Academy of Science, convinced Hyppolyte Bayard to delay publishing
Michael Foster mf...@yahoo.com wrote:
As with any significant and potentially profitable new technology, there is
a storm of treachery, theft, false claims and injustice surrounding it. The
Daguerreotype is a prime example. . . .
Yup. There is usually a storm of treachery, theft and so on.
Ishida, T., /Study of the anomalous nuclear effects in solid deuterium
systems/. 1992, Tokyo University. p. 131.
http://inspirehep.net/record/337964
Abstract:
By applying the Kamiokande nucleon decay/neutrino detector to neutron
measurement, we have achieved the unprecedented detection
No, I did not know that. Bayard protested the injustice by posing as a
drowned man and photographing himself. This helped him to recover from
the treacherous treatment and he continued to practice photography and
it sounds like he was well known while he was alive.
From: David Roberson
I am a bit confused about your statement that the gasoline engine has a
Carnot efficiency of 65%. If that calculation is just based upon the
maximum temperature of the hot gas within the cylinder as compared to the
cooler exhaust gas, then I would have to seek a
I am both pleased and privileged at your interest in my correct perceptions
of LENR processes. There are so many widely varied instances of these LENR
processes, there must be more than one cause.
There are instances where significant transmutation of elements and
isotopic shifts occurs without
The video is of Swartz giving the course.
- Jed
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
In the case of cold fusion, the process does not produce energetic products
and the final product is an intact helium nucleus. Nevertheless, the
nuclear energy appears as heat. Of course, radiation is produced and some
is
You offer an excellent explanation as to where the problems arise in ICE
development. The 6 stroke engines represent a good application of invention.
I do worry about the complications and possibly extra weight that would be
required to make these practical. With a little luck we will see
Kevin, I think that what Dr. Storms is stating about the dangerous radiation
emission is valid. In your scenario, the balloon is surrounded by many others
that absorb the high energy emissions. How does it account for balloons that
are very near to the edge of the bundle? If high level
Stewart, I read the article carefully and it does not go into enough detail for
anyone to determine how much energy is involved in the Bosenova release. There
is no mention of any radiation effects either. I suspect that what they are
speaking of is far too small of an energy release to be of
On Feb 11, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
In the case of cold fusion, the process does not produce energetic
products and the final product is an intact helium nucleus.
Nevertheless, the nuclear
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:00 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Kevin, I think that what Dr. Storms is stating about the dangerous
radiation emission is valid. In your scenario, the balloon is surrounded
by many others that absorb the high energy emissions. How does it account
for
The Maimon theory ignores several facts.
I'm trying to gather as much feedback on Ron's theory as I can, so that I
can get his comments. If you see anything, please mention it; I'll include
the objections in a followup blog post.
He proposes that the energy applied to remove an electron
Axil,
Nicely said but to pick one nit regarding syntax -when you said [snip] These
reactions must be catalyzed by chemical reactions where changes that strictly
involve the motion of electrons in the forming and breaking of chemical
bonds.[/snip] It isn't clear what you are saying is the
Eric, there seems to be confusion about how energy is measured and how
it is applied. Let's say that the electron identified as a k shell is
removed by adding 20 keV. The source of this energy is not important.
I assumed it resulted from electron bombardment and you assume it
comes from
http://ecatreport.com/ecat-plant/rossi-only-1mw-plants-available-at-this-time
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
In either case, the deuteron does not move. The energy goes into the
electron that is ejected well away from the atom. When it returns, a 20 keV
photon is emitted. This process only involves the electron. The process
Hi David, sorry for this late response. Experimentally I know of nothing
that has show fusion in the near absolute zero. It's pretty hard to
achieve a BEC in first place, and specifically one that exposes a nuclear
potential in its wave function. BECs will show superfluity when
it's neutral and
I have just posted a reference (Plasmons on a patterned surface can
enhance the production of bright electron beams) that describes how a
properly configured patterned surface of cavities and mounds can convert
the heat in the form of plasmons present in a lattice into electrons
localized on that
Hi Ed. Again sorry for the delayed response and right now all I can give
is a quick response.
Kim's theory is interesting as it's been refined more and more towards
effects at the nano-scale and he's also incorporating proton descriptions
that may allow his theory to describe H in Ni. Kim's
I wrote:
I personally am not qualified to judge whether what Ron is saying is
nonsense. I gather from his interactions with others on
physics.stackexchange.com, which has some pretty smart people on it, and
his overall reputation there, that he knows at least the basics of what
he's talking
25 matches
Mail list logo
