Among cheeses, I believe Stilton has one of the highest energy densities.
Harry
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:36 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The report included a couple of graphs on page 27. One was power out per
their measurement, the other power in. The mere fact that the
OK Harry, perhaps I took his comment the wrong way. I value your ideas and
hope that you keep spreading them my direction. There is no place on this list
for personal insults.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
Harry/Dave:
Andrew is borderline pathological skeptic. when challenged by Dave to do a
Spice model so they could compare them to see if they get the same results,
and if not, why, what does Andrew do? He starts with the insults and name
calling. Typical for a pathoskep who is called out on the
I won't bet a cent on papp engine, but unlike magnetic motors, if papp
engine is working is is visibly a nuclear energy source, like LENR in
hydride...
question on papp, like LENR, is not whether it is allowed to exist, but
whether it works.
I'm fed up with people mixing nonconventional nuclear
to be clear the test is a blackbox test from the entry of the controller to
the heat irradiated.
The cable may be an exotic alien cable including pixie dust and antimatter
hidden wires, and the test will be valid anyway...
there are some people that don't understand what is a blackbox, and what
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.netwrote:
There have been more than 60,000 papers published on high-temperature
superconductive material since its discovery in 1986, said Jak Chakhalian,
professor of physics at the University of Arkansas. Unfortunately, as of
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
And JC is WELL aware of this, yet asks the question as to why they used
3-phase power in their tests… the second test was SINGLE phase
Surely the control box is an integral part of the Rossi system under test?
Why then insist on internal sub-system measurements? Why not analyse the
Rossi system cleanly by just considering external inputs and outputs without
regard to internals? After all, an engineer doesn't break open an unknown
Both HTSC and CF were discovered before their time both
are very different from what was thought in the moments
of discovery and both need new tools, concepts and ideas
in order to be understood..
For LENR I recommend you to watch very carefully and without
prejudices what our colleague Axil says.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:32 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
You left out the more important part of my posting:
“And JC is WELL aware of this, yet asks the question as to why they used
3-phase
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:39 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Eric, I agree with what Mark is saying.
You agree with him that 3-phase was not used in the March run when the
paper says a control circuit having three-phase power input and
single-phase output.
I never claimed
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Both HTSC and CF were discovered before their time both
are very different from what was thought in the moments
of discovery and both need new tools, concepts and ideas
in order to be understood..
The validity of the
It was parallel thinking, I well know each field has its own
characteristics and fate. Cold Fusion had the problem of reproducibility
from the very start this
is the real cause of its bad reputation. Theoretical weakness has just added
to the problem- it seems to be so intellectual.
I understand
http://io9.com/the-first-image-ever-of-a-hydrogen-atoms-orbital-struc-509684
901
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Then they have not considered the obvious. Unless there is fraud at the
felony level, then Rossi has probably discovered something valid, and
Reproducibility is indeed the crux of most alt/fringe science technologies.
Conventional science is not so willing to accept hard to reproduce effects
as real, effects where not all of the requirements for reproducibility are
known or readily controllable.
This does not mean that these effects
On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:46:34 -0700
Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
Thank you for being straightforward on both points.
And now we definitively know that the cable itself is secret.
Of course, that will not bother the majority of people here. Move along,
nothing to see here.
I thought
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
But excess heat is certain in the
2011 series of experiments and this test of the Professors too.
You mean *you* are certain. Others are not. To say something is certain
should mean that certainty represents some kind
Rob wrote:
It should read 3P3W mode (page 12) and not in 3P4W mode
Yes indeed. But why are the tensions around 237 V and not around 400 V
AC? They switched the instrument in 3P3W mode, but being incompetent
(my opinion) they connected only two wires to the phases but one to
the neutral. The
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:46:34 -0700
Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
Thank you for being straightforward on both points.
And now we definitively know that the cable itself is secret.
Of course, that will not bother
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote:
Jed:
His two questions can easily be answered.
1) Since the science community currently believes a positive result to be
impossible (cold fusion is pseudoscience), such a result would change a
potential misperception
I think the analysis of the curve shapes is gross over-interpretation.
First of all, it's not clear from the paper that the square wave at the
input really represents a measurement, or an artist's conception. As far as
I understand, it's taken from the video, but all they really say is what
the
Joshua Cude wrote:
...I'm almost certain they were using 3-phase power on the input to the box.
They write: a control circuit having three-phase power input and
single-phase output. And it's on the input that the power measurement
is made, and so that's where it's relevant. That also forces a
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:18 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Harry/Dave:
Andrew is borderline pathological skeptic… when challenged by Dave to do a
Spice model so they could compare them to see if they get the same results,
and if not, why, what does Andrew do? He starts
that point merit some correction
http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?815-Celani-discovery-of-High-Temp-Superconduction-rejectedhttp://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?815-Celani-discovery-of-High-Temp-Superconduction-rejectedhighlight=celani+superconduction
Celani found HTSC as an anomaly,
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
that point merit some correction
http://www.amazon.com/Energy-Cold-Fusion-Antigravity-Znidarsic/dp/1480270237/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=apsie=UTF8qid=1369831335sr=1-1-catcorrkeywords=%22znidarsic+science+books%22
this is fun
Frank Znidarsic
Cude:
Why do you bother to respond when you post replies like that.
The result of the paper is different than the paper? Come now, the result
of the paper is a component of the paper, as a component, if it advances
knowledge, then the whole advances knowledge. Didn't you take logic in
your
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
Oh, and I haven't seen any links to videos. Any chance you could post
them again? Is this cheese power, perchance? If so, I've seen them, and I
have
Frank, is there an electronic version of your book? I clicked on your
link below thinking that I could buy a version for my Kindle, but it
only seems to be in paper.
Craig
On 05/29/2013 08:45 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
--- On Wed, 5/29/13, Claudio C Fiorini claudio.c.fior...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Claudio C Fiorini claudio.c.fior...@gmail.com
Subject: Re:[Vo]:PCE-830 manual and 3 phases measurement
To:
Axil's citation does support a 4d perspective of time sharing a spatial axis.
We sort of see this in the paradox twin where both twins exist at a different
angle between time and space and neither is locally aware of any differences in
either axis until they return to the same frame and compare
Ed, Why does your book not flip?
-Original Message-
From: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, May 29, 2013 8:45 am
Subject: look how nice my book flips now, I love Amazon
Andrew wrote:
*And now we definitively know that the cable itself is secret.*
**
Of course, that will not bother the majority of people here. Move
along, nothing to see here.
Obviously I mean the waveform is secret. Not the physical cable itself.
Levi et al. made this clear.
maye be they could change their position because a board of physicist did
not publish a Fatwa claiming tha HTSC was pseudo-science and crook job, and
because it was easier to reproduce...
the pattern of thing that are accepted are qite clear :
- fact should be so huge that it is stupid to deny
-
Vorl Bek wrote:
Whether or not they have ruled it out, nobody in his right mind
would let this single test convert him to a belief in lenr.
Perhaps. But anyone in his right mind who looks at all of the
experimental evidence for LENR will be convinced. As Mallove wrote in
1991: . . . to
Hi,
Last night I've been breaking my brain on this matter as well and I
think I know what possibly maybe going on.
On 29-5-2013 13:19, Claudio C Fiorini wrote:
Yes indeed. But why are the tensions around 237 V and not around 400 V AC? They
switched the instrument in 3P3W mode, but being
Does this means that they should not accept the Higgs boson work until it is
duplicated by entirely independent researchers (ones that have never worked at
CERN or with anyone who has worked there) at a second independent lab? Or to
accept it until it is seen in close to 100% of the shots?
I would like to submit my speculation about the latest Rossi hotCat for
discussion on Vortex-l.
- We are told that the central reactor core is a 310 stainless steel
cylinder ( 3cm by 33cm). There is no port for introduction of H2. The
ends are cold welded closed.
- When the test
I wrote:
But anyone in his right mind who looks at all of the experimental evidence
for LENR will be convinced.
I mean the totality of the evidence, as Mallove called it. People such as
Cude deny that there is such a thing as a totality of evidence. They do not
believe in the concept of
In fact I said the 3-phase input to the box was particularly unnecessary
*because* only single-phase was used for the box.
There are legitimate reasons to prefer 3-phase input. If the output
of the control box is a pulse width-modulated DC signal, then you need
a high-power DC source.
There
Hi,
On 29-5-2013 16:29, Bob Higgins wrote:
Consider what Celani has done - taken a Ni-Cu alloy wire and etched
out the Cu to realize the surface nanotexturing, thus creating NAEs on
the wire outer surface.
What if this wire is wound in a coil shape?
I believe the cylindrical outer heaters
Hi,
On 29-5-2013 16:47, Berke Durak wrote:
Using three phases you can get DC with decent ripple using only a
handful of diodes. The power never goes to zero, whereas it would go
to zero 100 times a second if you were using a full-wave rectifier
with single-phase input. If the peak power
*The powder is still the active agent of the reaction. In the December
test, the powder was concentrated in two places. This concentration
produced hot spots, uneven distribution of heat who control was difficult
leading to a meltdown.*
* *
* *
*If the active agent were produced on the inside
I believe the cylindrical outer heaters are just resistor coils embedded
in a high thermal conductivity ceramic.
I suspect that Andrea has at TWO sides of the power triangle more or less
regular resistors connected and between the phases at the third side a
resistor coil for a very
Harry, you need to examine the situation as a chemical problem. The
protons are normally in the metal lattice as H+ ions. These would go
into the gap ONLY if Gibbs energy were created. In other words, the
protons MUST be in a lower energy state in the gap compared to the
lattice for them
Hi,
On 29-5-2013 17:11, Bob Higgins wrote:
I think his reaction is being stimulated by heat (perhaps cycled
heating).
That's were the two more or less regular resistors play their role to
heat up the system, while the third coil is responsible for the oscillation.
Kind regards,
Rob
Hi,
What if the vessel is acting as a kind of capacitor and in conjunction
with the coil creates the ideal oscillation circuit?
Kind regards,
Rob
I see that behavior on conspiracy sites...
9/11 for example... but in many extremist opponents...
in facts Nassim Nicholas Taleb explain tha in real life, increasing the
volume of details, reduce the capacity to take the good decision.
big picture is often raising the best vision...
I recognize
*Are you saying that the oscillations set up in the mouse (outer cylinder)
induces oscillations inside the cat (inner cylinder)?*
* *
*The mouse pulls the cats tail?*
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.comwrote:
Hi,
What if the vessel is acting as a kind of
Joshua:
Your initial response was to my reply to Guglielmi's claim of an ethical
violation because the paper wouldn't advance knowledge. You have now come full
circle.
You said he was talking about the paper not the results. Now all you are saying
is that the methodology used by the testers
Hi,
On 29-5-2013 17:24, Axil Axil wrote:
*Are you saying that the oscillations set up in the mouse (outer
cylinder) induces oscillations inside the cat (inner cylinder)?*
**
*The mouse pulls the cats tail?*
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com
You make a good point. Three phase rectification and filtering is far easier
than single phase and that might be his reasoning. I suspect that sooner or
later he will begin using power factor correction electronics to get the
present relatively poor value of .5 up to standards.
The present
Morning Vorts,
Can I have a little time to look into it?
I do have a life and other responsibilities which consume a lot of time.
If indeed both tests used 3ph power INTO the control box, then I have no
problem with acknowledging the error!
I will reread the report later today.
-mark
Bob, this is a good analysis of a possible design. You are right, the
powder must make good thermal contact with the wall for the nuclear
reaction to be controlled by temperature. Just how Rossi makes this
happen is unknown. Nevertheless, most of the active nickel must be
attached to the
It seems tha the scientific community have not slipped, but is in normal
science mode, as Thomas Kuhn explain...
if you cannot integrate the fact in the know paradigm, adjust a detail
keeping the main paradigm, then last alternative is denying facts...
when facts cannot be ignored, because you no
He doesn't have to have constant stable sites. Perhaps instead it is a constant
creation of sites. For example (there must be many), he could be creating and
then creating sites with something like Nickel carbonyl that would could create
sites and the CO then be allowed to react again.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Well said. Go post that on the website. Why not?
***I tried posting 2 comments along the same vein. They have not been
released. In fact, it looks like no comments have been released for more
than a day.
Ok, wanted to correct any errors on my part as soon as possible so I did a
quick search and this is where I got the impression of single-phase:
pg 15
The E-Cat HT2's power supply departs from that of the device used in
December in that it is
no longer three-phase, but *single-phase*: the
On Wed, 29 May 2013 09:49:26 -0400
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Vorl Bek wrote:
Whether or not they have ruled it out, nobody in his right mind
would let this single test convert him to a belief in lenr.
Perhaps. But anyone in his right mind who looks at all of the
Dennis, I do not believe a process of continuous creation and
destruction of sites would be stable and would result in stable
production of energy, The creation and destruction processes are
independent of each other. Just by chance, one would get the upper
hand over the other, resulting
This is the dynamic NAE theory where ideally NAEs are formed and destroyed
at a constant rate. But the Dynamic NAEs are centered on the nickel powder
as a nucleating site.
The Nickel powder must be evenly distributed to keep the heat production
balanced. This is important, because this heat is
If there is carbonyl nickel inside the hot-cat, a leakage will be
extremely dangerous.
Tetra carbonyl nickel is known as liquid death.
.
On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:19:03 -0600, DJ Cravens wrote:
He doesn't have to have constant stable sites. Perhaps instead it is a
constant
I see a circuit that generates DC with 300 Hz ripple. Good idea, ripple
is so small that many DC loads would need no capacitors at all.
Be interesting to know the wt/power ratio, compared to the usual single
phase and three phase cases.
Ol' Bab
On 5/29/2013 11:05 AM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
From: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 7:29:30 AM
I would like to submit my speculation about the latest Rossi hotCat
for discussion on Vortex-l.
The Penon report (Aug 2012 -- the first hotcat radiative test)
From: Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 8:19:03 AM
What if the vessel is acting as a kind of capacitor and in
conjunction with the coil creates the ideal oscillation circuit?
That's just like the (Biblical) Arc of the Covenant. A wood (cedar) insulator,
with
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
A lot of intelligent people at wavewatching and elsewhere,
don't seem to be impressed with the experimental evidence.
None of these people has published a paper describing technical objections
to any experiment. They have no rational reason to doubt
Lol.
That's a little bit redonculous. Far more likely: neither he nor I have read
the paper closely enough.
Eric
On May 29, 2013, at 2:02, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Mark was mistaken about this, and his failure to acknowledge it
suggests he is deliberately trying to
Cude said:
And I think you use the term conspiracy theory incorrectly. In the case
of the ecat, it's really a just run-of-the-mill deception on the scale of
John Ernst Worrell Keely (whose lab was full of concealed tricks) or Papp
or Stoern or Madison Priest (who ran a secret cable across a
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. The implications of cold fusion are what got the world in a
tizzy in 1989. Everyone, including many (if not most) scientists were
prepared to embrace cold fusion *because* of the implications. Thousands of
Hi,
On 29-5-2013 17:22, Alain Sepeda wrote:
in facts Nassim Nicholas Taleb explain tha in real life, increasing
the volume of details, reduce the capacity to take the good decision.
big picture is often raising the best vision...
I recognize tha pathoskeptics have also their big picture, with
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I wrote:
But anyone in his right mind who looks at all of the experimental
evidence for LENR will be convinced.
I mean the totality of the evidence, as Mallove called it. People such as
Cude deny that there is
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not the opinion of the majority of observers of the case. Deception
on this scale -- frauds and scams -- are utterly common. Scientific
revolutions like this are very rare, especially from someone like Rossi.
Ed,
you make a good case that something improves the thermal bond of the powder to
the inner walls.. perhaps the function of the secret sauce.. I don't recall the
volume of the powder used but am under the impression it fills most of the
reactor tube and therefore must also have good thermal
Eric Walker wrote:
Most scientists, I expect, believe that a completely unequivocal
demonstration of claims of Rossi's magnitude would be a trivial
thing to stage, and would bear no resemblance to the farce that we
are seeing.
If there is any point of unanimity here (and there
Subject: Re: look how nice my book flips now, I love Amazon
I have all versions linked below, however, I checked the image and now it
stopped spinning. It only flips just like Ed's.
Cheated again!
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more dense
than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less) will
turn most observers away.
Fine, so most observers will be turned away by
multiple violations of rule 2.
(I suspect that he didn't read the rules before subscribing.)
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com
Fran, I would not guess how Rossi bonds the powder to the wall, only
that this must be done. A secret sauce is applied before the Ni is
placed in the e-Cat in order to create the NAE. You need to identify
how many additional secret sauces you think are involved. He also
places a hydride in
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more dense
than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less) will
turn most observers away.
Fine, so most observers will be turned away by this. From an
engineering
Eric/JC:
I've read the report twice fully, and a few other times only to verify a
specific statement.
I still did not catch the significance that it was the output of the control
box that was changed from 3ph to 1ph, not the input side. I posted as soon
as I could to correct my error.
Josh:
I
Ed,
I think you forget to add the EM stimulation controlled by the black box
between wall socket and the eCat.
Arnaud
_
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: mercredi 29 mai 2013 21:53
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re:
If the reactor is entangled globally as indicated in nanoplasmonic theory,
heat transfer would be isothermal based on super fluidic heat transfer.
The hydrogen would be the same temperature as the powder. and so would the
walls of the inner reactor tube.
The secret sauce may be used to produce
William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
multiple violations of rule 2.
(I suspect that he didn't read the rules before subscribing.)
Whoa! That seems precipitous. He did not seem so bad to me.
Rule 2. NO SNEERING. Ridicule, derision, scoffing, and ad-hominem is
banned. Debunking or
I had to go through the past few threads that I honestly wasn't following
to see what was meant. Yeah... I wouldn't have tolerated him as long as
Bill did. It seemed he lived to say, Oh Really?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
William Beaty
Ed,
Is sintering necessarily bad? Could the sintering have also occurred to a
lesser scale on the earlier ecat and actually be part of the NAE formation?
Fran
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 3:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
EMF simulation in the CB range will form nanoparticles (aka clusters).
Potassium is the best candidate for the formation of dynamic NAE through
nanoparticle formation when stimulated by EMF.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.bewrote:
**
Ed,
** **
I
If the powder sinters, I suppose:
That's good because it is what makes the powder stick to the wall.
That's bad because it reduces surface area. This is what caused Arata's
pure Pd black cells to stop working after a while.
Takahashi said it was not the high temperature but rather the chemical
I wrote:
That's bad because it reduces surface area. This is what caused Arata's
pure Pd black cells to stop working after a while.
I mean the Double Structured (DS) cathodes.
Those things were crammed full of Pd black, according to McKubre. I think
he said that. Cramming them full ensured
Fran, I have heated Ni many times and did not observe the sintering to
produce LENR. It only creats a brick of material. Sintering can be
prevented if the surface is partly oxidized or covered with a
compound. I suspect Rossi has created a compound containing NI on the
surface that forms
In the Arata experiment, when the powder melted, the reaction stopped.
In dynamic NAE creation, when the NAE is destroyed, new NAEs take its place
and the cycle is constant.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
That's bad because it reduces
Amaud, we do not know this is as a fact. That conclusion is only
proposed. We only know the black box controls the temperature INSIDE,
probably in a complex way. The Ni-H2 reaction has shown no need in
the past for EM stimulation. In any case, the design limits the
frequency to a very
From: Joshua Cude
First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more dense than
chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less) will turn most
observers away.
Not necessarily “most” - only those observers whose ability to deduce and
extrapolate from
Axil, you make your statements with great certainty. Have you ever
actually studied Ni and successfully caused LENR? I have and I do not
see the behavior you claim must occur.
Ed Storms
On May 29, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
EMF simulation in the CB range will form nanoparticles (aka
The EM stimulation may not need to be at a high frequency level. That could
be superwave as discussed here
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg80933.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg80933.html.
You say that the Ni/H reaction has shown no need of EM
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps you can invite him back after a bit? Also maybe Abd? I miss him.
I miss Abd too. I wish he would not post walls of text. But he always has
good counterarguments to make to rain on one's parade. This is a
You did not use the potassium based secret sauce that Rossi uses.
Without the ability to create potassium clusters, the reaction is weak.
Using only hydrogen clusters will not support a vigorous reaction.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Axil, you
Amaud, I have no doubt EM stimulation will enhance the LENR reaction.
The only question is whether Rossi is successfully applying such
stimulation. Based on the design of the hot-e-Cat, I do not see any
indication of EM being applied. The suggestion hat it is being created
in the black
Jed asked:
Question: assuming it really is 0.3 g, what is the likely volume?
Nowhere near enough to fill the cylinder.
*Why such a large cylinder?*
- most likely would be to get the necessary surface area to adequately
transfer the heat from interior to exterior.
-mark
From: Jed
On May 29, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
You did not use the potassium based secret sauce that Rossi uses.
How do you know his sauce is potassium based?
Without the ability to create potassium clusters, the reaction is
weak. Using only hydrogen clusters will not support a vigorous
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
