See:
http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/materials/the-hunt-for-the-magnetic-monopole/?utm_source=techalertutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=081513
Alberto.
from 2010
New Quantum Theory Separates Gravitational and Inertial Mass
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/419367/new-quantum-theory-separates-gravitational-and-inertial-mass/
They show how it is possible to create situations in the quantum world in
which the effects of inertial and
Here is the script for my ICCF18 Luncheon Talk. This was well received. It
has cute illustrations.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJlessonsfro.pdf
I have to write an oh-so-serious version for the Proceedings, in academese.
This one is more fun.
I am also trying to squeeze Mizuno's paper
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:49:58 -0700:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
See http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1953PhRv...90..865W. The reaction is highly
exothermic:-
1H+3H = 4He + 19.814 MeV + gamma
It probably has a low cross section for hot fusion because the energy is
disposed
It does not make sense to compare AVErage to MAXimum, anyways, because it
depends upon having access to so much data that one can take the average of
it. So I'm going to revise this aspect of the Bang4TheBuck calculation
into 1/2 the maximum. One half of 300MJ is 150MJ. One half of 6MJ is
3MJ.
Basic derision
***That's all the skeptopaths seem to be able to muster. They can't
counteract the science. They downshift into ridicule because they can get
away with it. It's basically like saying, hey, look, I can be an asshole
and get away with it, so that's what I'm going to do. It does
thanks for your kind words in the talk.
I like it.
And yes materials are very important.
23% Ag, 2% Ce (or 2% Y) always gave me the best overall performance.
But you do have to treat it nice.
Using a model builders sand blaster with cerium oxide was a quick easy way to
clean up the metal.
Thanks for bumping the thread -- T4BTT
LENR seems to have its own set of Anti-Science Truthers. In the last couple
of years, there has been quite a bit of activity in the area of Low Energy
Nuclear Reactions. Originally, the field was called Cold Fusion in 1989
when Pons Fleischmann announced
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
But it is not an established ENGINEERING field ...
But it is not an established THEORETICAL field ...
Vigilante Censorship, censorship by thread spamming
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2981505/posts
To: *Moonman62*
*I’m going to continue to post to you under FR’s guidelines. Your
interpretation of the guidelines is wrong. That’s why your repeated
attempts to get me banned have
Cold fusioneers cannot get a US patent
Even anti-LENR anti-science Luddites acknowledge this is the case, and
applaud it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2981505/posts?page=13#13
To: *Moltke*
*The patent office does not care whether or not it works. That’s for the
*market* to decide.*
Very nice table talk.
You included these good-natured observations: If you want great science,
you must settle for lots of schlock science, and also many *odd people*.
And, by his own account, Watson was always ready to cut corners and goof
off. He described a conference in Italy in 1951, a
Dear Friends
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/why-pd-d-lenr-will-never-work.html
Time can and will show if I was right. Anyway, the mission of
truth is to help problem solving and progress even it makes
some people unhappy and even angry.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
13 matches
Mail list logo
