On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:53 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Dramatic!
As alternate way of revealing the paradox, I imagined the two charged
balls connected by a spring which counter balances the force of repulsion.
In the reference frame where the balls are moving, a magnetic force
Is this a report of the same demo for which we previously saw the
video. I dont think the high voltage arc discharges appeared in the
video, and seem to be quite different to the low voltage electric arc
welder style demo. Both demos come within the patent description.
For the high
Correction:
If the result of the magnetic force being seen to act on one frame as
expected from the flux in another leads to a dramatic and non-trivial
paradox, it is going to be harder to keep up the delusion that such is
possible.
If an observer in another frame expects a force to exist in the
[snip] So it makes far more sense to consider this proof of something that can
exist, the aether, than proof of something that can't (all frames being equal
and experiencing unequal time dilation equally).[/snip]
EXACTLY! Our metrics of time and distance all assume physical objects to limit
If I can't solve the world's energy problems perhaps I can help manage its
waste. Progress report on #1 plastic detector. Video linked below type mp4 5
MB.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/PlasticDetect.mp4
Frank Znidarsic
Jones-Axil, Ed, etal
Check out the current (Feburary) issue of Scientific American--page
32--regarding the radius of the proton. Seems the wave functions overlap
better than one might have concluded from old theory.
The researchers have interesting connections to active long-term LENR
JOnes,
0.5 C is easy enough to measure.
What I found disappointing was the COP = 2.8
-Original Message-
From: a.ashfield
0.5 C is easy enough to measure.
What I found disappointing was the COP = 2.8
Even that inflated estimate could go away with a poof when they measure P-in
from the wall, which should always be done with pulsed power.
But the huge disappointment in
Axil--
How do you get wind of all these good items?
Bob
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 9:10 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)
http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf
A 10^16 magnetic field will deconfine the quarks in
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
Check out the current (Feburary) issue of Scientific American--page
32--regarding the radius of the proton. Seems the wave functions overlap
better than one might have concluded from old theory.
The researchers have interesting connections to active
Harry, that is an interesting experiment. I will certainly give it some
thought since it approaches the problem from a different angle. (pun intended)
This is similar to the case where a second non moving charge counters the
initial repulsion. My first thought is that this idea might
To add a few more details into the mix for future reference,
here are some slides with most of the basic mathematical formalities.
http://moriond.in2p3.fr/QCD/2011/FridayAfternoon/Pachucki.pdf
The overriding proposition is this:
I thought it was an interesting report, but I think a fundamental issue may
be getting missed in the calorimetry of the BLP experiment.
As I understand it, the calorimeter was modified to have the large copper
electrodes that supply the very high spot welder current placed into the
test chamber.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:50 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
But Terry, but are these epo's moving?
No, unless they are hit by a photon which alters their polarization.
Hotson explains it well in the referenced article. Although, it might
help to read his first two articles before.
If the past is prolog, the Papp engine produced very little if any heat.
The same will be true for the Mills engine.
Mills engine energy production will come from two places: pressure/shock
wave expansion with associated plasma movement and the production of excess
electrons. These two energy
The Third Way of Thermal-Electric Conversion beyond Seebeck and Pyroelectric
Effects
Thermal-electric conversion is crucial for smart energy control and harvesting,
such as thermal sensing and waste heat recovering. So far, people are aware of
only two ways of direct thermal-electric
As Dave has mentioned, Einstein's reason for postulating the constancy of c
was partly motivated by his examination of the laws of electrodynamics.
Here is the introduction to his paper ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING
BODIES. You can see he is bothered by a lack of symmetry in the laws but a
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrpyUA1pQqE
Will LENR help?
My view on SR is of course that it can not be possible.
But it does give some interesting and correct answers, now impossible is
still impossible, but...
If we reduce the magnet in Einstein's example to an electromagnet, or
better yet just one straight wire carrying a DC current. (or a macro
UK Ministry of Defence Document Lists Cold Fusion as ‘Credible Strategic Shock’
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/02/uk-ministry-of-defence-document-lists-cold-fusion-as-credible-strategic-shock/
Links to :
While I would still like to know what voltage a non-ferromagnetic N-machine
generator will establish at different RPM's, I looked up and found that
Depalma's chart of voltage to RPM in his Sunburst machine was linear,
double the RPM produced double the output voltage.
This would seem hard to
They need to read Jed's book.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher
The following is a selection of credible strategic shocks
Here is another one which is more a twist on a known risk. And it could involve
LENR but not in the way most are anticipating.
The most credible and imminent future shock for the USA
BLP and Tesla Motors have in common?
One of the unrecognized applications of the NiH reactor is its application
to gravity modification.
According to the theory expressed in this thread, since the NiH reactor
contains superconducting fields of distorted and degenerate vacuum
energy generated by enormous self reinforcing magnetic
I agree, I thought I noticed in one of Rossi's videos the hot cat was
moving around in the rack...
On Thursday, February 20, 2014, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the unrecognized applications of the NiH reactor is its application
to gravity modification.
According to the theory
Here is a patent that describes how to build an anti-gravity engine.
http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2012/11/anti-gravity-patent-available-for-development-2495864.html
The NiH reactor will provide a good self contained power source for an
anti-gravity vehicle.
On Thu, Feb 20,
This article is from 2006. Has there been any update since then? When are
we allowed to say that Einstein's theory is off by 20 orders of magnitude
due to 250 experiments performed?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:51 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
It does seem to be very similar the the initial Podkletnov effect.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
This article is from 2006. Has there been any update since then? When
are we allowed to say that Einstein's theory is off by 20 orders of
magnitude
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
BLP and Tesla Motors have in common?
Hmmm... I was looking for a Board member in common. Does not seem to be the
case. What I found was that three of BLP's prestigious former Board members,
including Michael Jordan, former CEO of Westinghouse,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hmmm... I was looking for a Board member in common.
A Tesla has a great grid leveling device on board. A power source,
constant or transient, could make for a autonomous vehicle.
Of course, it's a fruity idea, eh?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hmmm... I was looking for a Board member in common.
A Tesla has a great grid leveling device on board. A power source,
constant or transient, could
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:57 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
It does seem to be very similar the the initial Podkletnov effect.
Dr. Ning Li's company went black around that time.
I would have thought that relative motion to an electric field would
probably create the observation of a magnetic field, both in SR (that I
reject) and in an aether model.
But I am starting to question that, I would appreciate any answer to the
following:
Take a long piece of dowel, apply
I wrote:
Mpemba Paradox Revisited -- Numerical Reinforcement –
http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.1014
Structure order, local potentials, and physical anomalies of water ice:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.3880
- Mark Jurich
The gravity modification principle explained in the other thread was based
on photons enclosed by a superconductor that are rotating at a rapid rate.
All these requirements are included in the NiH reactor: widespread
superconductivity, photons at extreme densities and just to cover all the
bases
more...
a background article as follows:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.03/antigravity_pr.html
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The gravity modification principle explained in the other thread was based
on photons enclosed by a superconductor
Axil, This had no intentional relationship to the other thread.
This post simply asks the question:
If a magnetic field is observed to exist from a moving electric field, if
the electric field if from a long (even infinity long) narrow spindle
charged to a high potential, then what would the
Here's an arrogant reply I received regarding this article:
Experiment that is almost certainly wrong, or large galaxies would be
sucking their local small cluster galaxies in at rates that astronomers
would have seen a long time ago.
First: the article is wrong. The magnetic analogue of the
That's why there has been no follow up to this blunderously awesome
experiment in eight years,
This statement may not be correct...Recent work on anti gravity.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1101/1101.2419.pdf
Review of Poher experiment on fields produced by electric discharges in a
I have been trying to conceive of experiments that would give a different
result based on if a magnetic field was created by only the electrons in a
wire, or also created by the protons in a wire dependant on relative
velocity.
I have thought of many that do not even need testing and furnish the
Has any later news of Podkletnov**surfaced?
This wired article was interesting
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.03/antigravity_pr.html
Sounds like Wired was persuaded the effect was real.
Try This
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-on-antigravity.html
I am looking for this paper:
Study of Light Interaction with Gravity Impulses and Measurements of the
Speed of Gravity Impulses
I would love to read it if I could find it.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at
On further thought, I think I can debunk my own idea here.
The problem is that if the magnetic field is not moving relative to the
drifting electrons then it is moving relative to the circuit (volt meter
probes) that check for the hall effect voltage, and these moving magnetic
fields would be
Here is a sample:
http://benthamscience.com/ebooks/Sample/9781608053995-sample.pdf
You can buy it for $30 here:
http://www.eurekaselect.com/100222/chapter/study-of-light-interaction-with-gravity-impulses-and-measurements-of-the-speed-of-gravity-impulse
You may be able to get it off this guy
Hopefully, this has not already been posted to Vortex --
Method for producing helium-3 using a hydrogenated lattice (red fusion)
US 20130329844 A1 - Publication date Dec 12, 2013
Abstract
Helium-3 (also known as He-3 or 2He3) is created in a nuclear fusion
reaction by fusing Deuterium (1D2)
This post contains 2 thoughts, one an idea of how to show why time dilation
in SR can't work, the other to point to interesting conclusions of various
arguments.
First is a train on a large turntable, the larger the turn table the less G
force needs to be.
The turn table either accelerates to a
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:06 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
As Dave has mentioned, Einstein's reason for postulating the constancy of c
was partly motivated by his examination of the laws of electrodynamics.
... Here is the introduction to his paper ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING
48 matches
Mail list logo
