[Vo]:[test, please ignore]
Haven't been receiving mails from Vortex for 2 days. This is a reflector test
Re: [Vo]:[test, please ignore]
Check your spam file. Gmail has suddenly started sending many of my Vortex messages to the spam file. Actually, it does not send them, because I have a filter set up to overrule it, but many messages say: *This message was not sent to Spam because of a filter you created.* (Your message said that too.) Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com wrote: Haven't been receiving mails from Vortex for 2 days. This is a reflector test
Re: [Vo]:[test, please ignore]
Wow, same here! :O 2014-04-23 9:56 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com: Check your spam file. Gmail has suddenly started sending many of my Vortex messages to the spam file. Actually, it does not send them, because I have a filter set up to overrule it, but many messages say: This message was not sent to Spam because of a filter you created. (Your message said that too.) Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com wrote: Haven't been receiving mails from Vortex for 2 days. This is a reflector test -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
RE: [Vo]:[test, please ignore]
This happened to me recently. The solution that worked for me is to re-subscribe. To subscribe, send a *blank* message to: vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com Put the single word subscribe in the subject line of the header. NOTHING else! No quotes around subscribe, of course. -Original Message- From: Daniel Rocha Wow, same here! :O 2014-04-23 9:56 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com: Check your spam file. Gmail has suddenly started sending many of my Vortex messages to the spam file. Actually, it does not send them, because I have a filter set up to overrule it, but many messages say: This message was not sent to Spam because of a filter you created. (Your message said that too.) Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com wrote: Haven't been receiving mails from Vortex for 2 days. This is a reflector test -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
[Vo]:subscribe
Re: [Vo]:[test, please ignore]
Confirmed here too! gmail has put vortex-l on the spam-list! I suppose that a number marking vortex-l messages as NOT SPAM would help the filter bot change its mind... 2014-04-23 16:16 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net: This happened to me recently. The solution that worked for me is to re-subscribe. To subscribe, send a *blank* message to: vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com Put the single word subscribe in the subject line of the header. NOTHING else! No quotes around subscribe, of course. -Original Message- From: Daniel Rocha Wow, same here! :O 2014-04-23 9:56 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com: Check your spam file. Gmail has suddenly started sending many of my Vortex messages to the spam file. Actually, it does not send them, because I have a filter set up to overrule it, but many messages say: This message was not sent to Spam because of a filter you created. (Your message said that too.) Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com wrote: Haven't been receiving mails from Vortex for 2 days. This is a reflector test -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:[test, please ignore]
Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote: Confirmed here too! gmail has put vortex-l on the spam-list! It is not just Vortex messages. I think the filter is being triggered by unusually short messages. Other short messages from various people have been marked as Spam lately. Google must have tweaked their spam detection software lately. They went overboard, filtering out too many messages. They will probably fix the problem soon. As you say, it will help if people mark messages as not spam. I have had problems with short messages generated by hacked g-mail accounts that begin with messages such as: Hi! How are you? People say it works . . . with a link to a web site that steals your e-mail log on. I have gotten 4 or 5 of these, including one from someone who is long dead. I told his relatives to close down the account. I suppose the hackers have access to all of his e-mail. G-mail correctly identifies these messages. It says: *Be careful with this message. *It contains content that's typically used to steal personal information. Learn morehttp://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=1074268ctx=mail - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin
G-mail thinks this is spam. This is an example of a short message that was rejected. - Jed On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings Vortex-L, Never knew such rotations were possible: *https://www.sciencenews.org/article/laser-kicks-molecules-fastest-ever-spin https://www.sciencenews.org/article/laser-kicks-molecules-fastest-ever-spin* *Ad Astra,* *Ron Kita, Chiralex* *Of note: Camphor molecules are spherical and can attain very high rotations..even in the solid state. S.O. Morgan of Bell Labs.*
Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin
This message was rejected to my spam when it was posted originally, but now the spam override filter I installed seems to be working for this message retransmission. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings Vortex-L, Never knew such rotations were possible: *https://www.sciencenews.org/article/laser-kicks-molecules-fastest-ever-spin https://www.sciencenews.org/article/laser-kicks-molecules-fastest-ever-spin* *Ad Astra,* *Ron Kita, Chiralex* *Of note: Camphor molecules are spherical and can attain very high rotations..even in the solid state. S.O. Morgan of Bell Labs.*
Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: G-mail thinks this is spam. This is an example of a short message that was rejected. I suppose we must have experienced something like this before since some of us, myself included, already had a filter which routes messages with the [VT] prefix to the inbox. Hmm, was that why the [VT] prefix was established by Bill. Damned if I can remember.
Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: G-mail thinks this is spam. This is an example of a short message that was rejected. I suppose we must have experienced something like this before since some of us, myself included, already had a filter which routes messages with the [VT] prefix to the inbox. I have it filtered by the To: field. I do not need the [VT]. The filter parameters are: Matches: to:(vortex-l@eskimo.com) Do this: Skip Inbox, Mark as read, Apply label Vortex, Never send it to Spam G-mail has good filtering capabilities. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: I have it filtered by the To: field. I do not need the [VT]. The filter parameters are: Matches: to:(vortex-l@eskimo.com) Do this: Skip Inbox, Mark as read, Apply label Vortex, Never send it to Spam Hah! I have that one too. When did we create them? Or is your memory as bad as mine? :-)
Re: [Vo]:Lasers and UltraHigh Molecular Spin
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: Matches: to:(vortex-l@eskimo.com) Do this: Skip Inbox, Mark as read, Apply label Vortex, Never send it to Spam Hah! I have that one too. When did we create them? Or is your memory as bad as mine? :-) There is no date on the filters. If the computer doesn't know, I don't know. Here is something clever in the g-mail Settings, under the General tab: Undo Send: Enable Undo Send Send cancellation period: 5102030 seconds This gives you 5 seconds to recall an e-mail. This feature was introduced without fanfare last year. Another handy trick is Ctrl-space to remove formatting. Google does not list their keystroke macros anywhere as far as I know. (Keystroke macro = shortcut). - Jed
Re: [Vo]:[OT] But not entirely: Book: CAPITAL in the Twenty-First Century, by Thomas Piketty
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:05 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: A book recommendation: http://www.amazon.com/Capital-Twenty-First-Century-Thomas-Piketty/dp/067443000X/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1398126885sr=1-1keywords=capital+in+the+twenty-first+century I am thinking of hunkering down and reading this book at some point. Doing that is probably something one would need to commit to in this case, in the same way that one would need to set aside many weeks to read Weber's *Economy and Society*. A nice summary of Piketty's argument that I've read elsewhere is something like: increasing inequality in income is intrinsic to capitalism and is not an incidental, unrelated effect. The word increasing is important -- Piketty seems to be saying that with un- or under-regulated capitalism, not only do you get inequality in income (to be expected), but ever more inequality over time as well. In other words, rentiers take hold and gradually increase the scope of what they control at everyone else's expense, and this process is intrinsic to raw capitalism. Btw, here is the explanation I read for why eight or so Vortex messages ended up in the spam folder: *Why is this message in Spam?* We've found that lots of messages from eskimo.com are spam. Learn morehttp://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=1366858ctx=mailexpand=5 So it seems that eskimo.com might have been blacklisted. Eric
