Thanks Mark
This could be a further indication of some kind of cross-identity. Of course,
when an electron is emitted from a neutron beta decay - there are those who
strongly believe that it arose ab initio -- and was never a part of the 3 quark
arrangement.
Thus - it is both an open
My understanding is that quarks don't weigh enough to constituted of
muons. While we hear of protons and neutrons being described as an
assemblage of 3 quarks, they are talking about the valence quarks, and
there are many more quark-antiquark pairs that constitute the whole mass of
the proton or
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/08-oct-2015.html
Yours,
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
When I read all the theories and how they conflict or partly agree with me
*I wonder why we do not hear about anyone replicating Holmlid's experiment.?
I am not able to set up the required components or conduct the measurements
required. However, it amazes me that we do not hear others doing it -
Holmlid says that mesons are created in addition to muons. If that is the
case, rydberg matter has the ability to produce strong force effects since
the meson is made of a quark and its anti-quark partner. At least one quark
can be produced from the vacuum if enough energy is pumped into it.
I
Mark,
Thanks. I will share some data/photos with vortex shortly. Reef surveys
in Kauai are pointing to accelerated "corrosion" of the calcium (which is a
metal) reef structure, converting it to CaCl2 and CaO, both can be
byproducts of stray electrical current corrosion in saltwater, which is
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Even the neutrino, another "invented particle" has been shown to have a
> real identity, having once served the same purpose, which is as
> place-holder, in the past. Not the quark.
This may be true. But the iconoclast
From: Bob Higgins
* My understanding is that quarks don't weigh enough to constituted of
muons.
No one can be sure of that. In fact no one has a clue about the mass of quarks,
and there is a range which varies by orders of magnitude. Since the quark is
not really a
Which is why they attacked the Wright brothers most recently in 2003.
Their latest on cold fusion is here:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-future-is-now-again-for-back-to-the-future-part-ii/
I posted a message in response.
- Jed
It's annoying to read this communication to MFMP :
https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/1051219568242075
Statement from NRL source on their... - Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project |
Facebook
Statement from NRL source on their position, re their data, cited in the
This is mainly for Stewart (ChemE) due to his hypothesis that pulsed Doppler
radar is damaging coral reefs, but thought the Collective might like to see
it as well.
http://www.biosciencetechnology.com/news/2015/10/scientists-major-coral-blea
ching-crisis-spreads-worldwide
-mark iverson
@Ecco
You said:
"What if Lithium, as a penetrating corrosive agent (especially in the case
of Nickel), is accelerating the embrittlement/corrosion process so that
eventually, yet at a quicker rate than normal, the right nanoscale
structures can appear on the metal?"
This is a good observation.
12 matches
Mail list logo