[Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

In case you missed this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WN1NPdWttMC1RdEU/view Courtesy of MFMP. "If confirmed, such process releases similar or higher energy than fission of Uranium 200MeV." "4. The Ultra-dense hydrogen Leif Holmlid *30+ papers* 2008-2015"

[Vo]:LENR INFO , ENTERING (ME) IN PLATINUM YEAR

launched now before going to my favorite restaurant with the Family http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/oct-25-2015-info-andentering-my.html Yours, Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Holmlid vs. the Cowled Wikipedia Conservatory

You may turn to the talk page of the Wikipedia article on Rydberg Matter to find Prof Holmlid locked in a struggle with various Keepers of the Light who wish to see the Rydberg Matter article deleted. The good news is that this struggle took place in 2010 and the Wikipedia entry is still up.

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Bob Why does the electron charge to mass ratio come out in support of it having 511 keV of energy if it really has much more? That seems contradictory. The way I understand it, all of the energy has a mass equivalent. Dave -Original Message- From: Bob Higgins

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Thanks Eric. There are a lot of interesting ideas presented in that slide show, many of the ideas I've seen commented on here. In one of his last slides he mentions theoretical solutions, one being multibody fusion hinting at a Chubb's style n-body fusion. Conceptually I've always found the S

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:29 PM, David Roberson wrote: The Pauli exclusion principle appears to be a rule that captures a portion > of a deeper underlying physical phenomena. If what I suspect is true then > one day new particles, etc. will be discovered that do not obey

[Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

CPT THEOREM C(harge) -P(arity=reflection) -T(ime reversal) INVARIANCE is a property of any quantum field theory in Flat space times which respects: (i) Locality, (ii) Unitarity and (iii) Lorentz Symmetry. Holmlid is producing neutral K mesons. This particle demonstrates CP violation, The

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

The dirac electron does not have any mass! Here is some education http://www.spinograph.org/blog/what-heck-dirac-electron On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:05 PM, David Roberson wrote: > Being a skeptic, I have to question the Pauli exclusion principal itself. > How do we know

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:52 PM, CB Sites wrote: I found that to be a very interesting slide show. Is there an audio/video > track of the lecture to go with it? That is from HyperPhysics, a Web site authored largely by Rod Nave, now a retired physics professor from Georgia

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

This is why polaritons are important in LENR. Polaritons are electrons that have be converted into bosons with double the spin. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:29 PM, David Roberson > wrote: > > The

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Being a skeptic, I have to question the Pauli exclusion principal itself. How do we know that it is actually a physical reality? It may have appeared true during most of the previous experimentation, but how can we be sure it is anything more than an observation that has worked up until now?

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:05 PM, David Roberson wrote: Being a skeptic, I have to question the Pauli exclusion principal itself. > How do we know that it is actually a physical reality? It may have > appeared true during most of the previous experimentation, but how can we >

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Dave, Doesn't the Pauli exclusion principle come about from the quantum mechanical magnetic moment of the particle's spin state. That would seem to be a physical attribute of the particle and not something that can easily be wiped away. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:39 AM, CB Sites

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Think substance over style. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > This is why polaritons are important in LENR. Polaritons are electrons >> that have be converted into bosons with

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Perhaps it is as simple as what you suggest CB, but does that explain every case? Can we be confident that there are no future particles to be discovered that behave in a different manner although they have similar spins? If not, then why call it something fancy like the Pauli exclusion

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Axil Axil wrote: This is why polaritons are important in LENR. Polaritons are electrons that > have be converted into bosons with double the spin. > I much prefer when you use multiple colors and stylish fonts. Eric

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

I found that to be a very interesting slide show. Is there an audio/video track of the lecture to go with it? On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:05 PM, David Roberson > wrote: > > Being a skeptic, I have

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

I agree Eric. So far observations have shown the Pauli principle to be applicable. But, that does not really prove that it is a real physical phenomena. As you say, a new physical process needs to be found which explains the behavior if new discoveries prove it is not universal. Science is

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

in physical cosmology , *baryogenesis* is the generic term for the hypothetical physical processes that produced an asymmetry (imbalance) between baryons and antibaryons

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: That's an interesting characterization considering it was Sveinn Ólafsson > that did the presentation, that Holmlid has had a number of co-authors on > his papers, that his university has published his press

RE: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Correction: Deuteron disintegration which supplies about 1 GeV per nucleon is about 167 times more energy dense than nuclear fusion of deuterium to helium. Assumption: 1 GeV per nucleon vs 24 MeV per 4 nucleons (in the He-4 nucleus). However, a sizeable percentage of that disintegration energy

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

"The larger physics establishment" in my opinion is like the "vast right wing conspiracy". The fact is, he made it past peer review and published in real journals. I just think he's way more interesting than freaking Rossi who publishes squat. On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker

RE: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

There are a number of LENR observers who are skeptical of the past findings that with Pd-D electrolysis, helium has been detected which is commensurate with excess heat. Notably, this stance has been taken and staunchly defended by Steve Krivit - and has a certain amount of (wait-and-see)

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Jones, Once again you slapped your glove on Hotson's face. Your comment, "No one needs to be convinced that matter and antimatter can be made to annihilate" is just such a slap. Regarding electrons and positrons in particular, Hotson rightly points out that these two particles are fermions. As

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Jones Beene wrote: > > The rationale of this argument is that in subwatt electrolysis, the helium > produced is necessarily well below background levels and must enriched before > it can be detected in any device . . . > That is true for some experiments, but not others:

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

I did, I made an edit back in the beginning of October. It hasn't been reverted yet: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rydberg_matter=history On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Blaze Spinnaker

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

To Jones' point regarding annihilation and disintegration ... These are not the same. Annihilation is the total conversion of entities having mass into energy. Disintegration is the breakup of a composite particle into its constituents. To Eric's question ... A proton is a composite particle.

[Vo]:two images I found interesting

Hi, I thought people here might enjoy these images. Here is a picture of the sun, taken from Super-Kamiokande, the neutrino detector in Japan: http://strangepaths.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/sun.jpg Here is the table of elements, with their line spectra included:

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: The quark descriptions having +2/3e or -1/3 e charge seems contrived. Note that the quark description is intimately bound up with the so-called "resonances," some of which are baryons consisting of different

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:29:59 -0700: Hi, [snip] >That way is Holmlid’s finding of nucleon disintegration following laser >irradiation of dense deuterium clusters. Ironically, it provides far more net >energy than does nuclear fusion. > > >The most cogent

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

http://hfmphysics.com/2014/SlidesTutorials/Wen.pdf See slide: String-net/entanglement unification of light and electrons • Q: Where do light and electron come from? A: They come from qubits that form the space (the qubit-aether). • Q: Why do light and electron exist? A: Because the qubits form

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Mon, 26 Oct 2015 07:39:15 +1100: Hi, [snip] >2) If the standard model is wrong and baryons are really made of muon anti-muon >pairs, then there is anti-matter in close proximity to matter. Strictly speaking they are not in pairs. Triplets or Borromean

Re: [Vo]:two images I found interesting

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:35:04 -0500: Hi, >Hi, > >I thought people here might enjoy these images. Here is a picture of the >sun, taken from Super-Kamiokande, the neutrino detector in Japan: > >http://strangepaths.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/sun.jpg I

RE: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

From: Bob Higgins Ø Ø To Jones' point regarding annihilation and disintegration ... These are not the same. Annihilation is the total conversion of entities having mass into energy. Disintegration is the breakup of a composite particle into its constituents. OK Bob, I will

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: "4. The Ultra-dense hydrogen Leif Holmlid *30+ papers* 2008-2015" > Holmlid is kind of a one-man show. See this answer to a question I raised on Physics.SE sometime back:

RE: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Having studied a dozen or so of these papers but being far from an expert, here a couple of comments for those who are even more baffled than I am. 1) Holmlid’s thinking on the details has changed over time. There are inconsistencies. His critics will pick up on these but look past that

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

That's an interesting characterization considering it was Sveinn Ólafsson that did the presentation, that Holmlid has had a number of co-authors on his papers, that his university has published his press release(a rather risky thing to do, considering), and that he has had numerous peer reviewed

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid vs. the Cowled Wikipedia Conservatory

I thought this was interesting: - The President of Russian Academy of Sciences Vladimir Fortov has recently noted the works on Rydberg Matter as a great scientific event [33] http://tass.ru/opinions/interviews/1599386 On Sun,

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: Regarding electrons and positrons in particular, Hotson rightly points out > that these two particles are fermions. As fermions, they are forbidden to > be in the same place at the same time, and so cannot

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

The assumption that rydberg matter alone is the cause of the reaction is not correct, IMHO. It is only a means. It's the application of optical power to lots of rydberg hydrogen that does the trick. An electric arc near a catalyst in a hydrogen flow that is filtered. We need the arc to produce the

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

Rydberg Matter Fuel Preparation Why does the LeClair reactor produce radiation and neutrons and the device invented by James Griggs does not? It’s a matter of temperature. The James Griggs device runs at an operating temperature of 400F, whereas, the LeClair reactor is not pressurized and does

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

That is the energy given off to send the normal space positronium atom into a DDL-like minimum energy orbit. When the electron-positron orbiting pair becomes in the DDL orbit (orbital radius about the diameter of a proton), it becomes undetectable and it is part of the negative energy sea. It is

RE: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

From: Bob Higgins Ø Regarding electrons and positrons in particular, Hotson rightly points out that these two particles are fermions. As fermions, they are forbidden to be in the same place at the same time, and so cannot annihilate. Instead of annihilation, they fall into orbit around

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: That is the energy given off to send the normal space positronium atom into > a DDL-like minimum energy orbit. > If we allow this description, could Jones's discussion of the quark-antiquark annihilation be

Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Jones Beene wrote: Protons are fermions. At the LHC, they routinely collide protons. These > protons are said to disintegrate. Note as well that the Pauli exclusion principle applies to fermions of the same kind and quantum numbers. If

RE: [Vo]:slide deck for ultradense hydrogen / Leif Holmlid

From: Eric Walker Protons are fermions. At the LHC, they routinely collide protons. These protons are said to disintegrate. > Note as well that the Pauli exclusion principle applies to fermions of the > same kind and quantum numbers. If Hotson argues that an electron and a > positron would