Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

Ahhhthe famous Edison light bulb scam: Light cannot be created without something being burned! Grins, Ron Kita, Chiralex On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Hmm permalink didn't work, but here it is: > > Alain Coetmeur 4 hours ago > >

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

What's particularly arrogant is he says "respect scientists" but then he's denigrating all of the extremely well educated and talented scientists that actually believe in cold fusion. I think Ethan is having a nervous breakdown. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Blaze Spinnaker

[Vo]:Fw: Magnetic levitation experiments

They were DC motor spikes at causing osclilations 50 Mhz at pickup coil. H Ucar -- Original message--From: jjamdix@gmail.comDate: Sun, Nov 8, 2015 23:10To: vortex-L@eskimo.com;Cc: Subject:Re: Magnetic levitation experiments Jones, I noticed high frequency transients on videos scope

[Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

I exploded two button batteries by heating through soldering iron. Explosion is spectacular, maybe comparable to amno. When exploded the content is completely blow out and sticked as fine gray powder to suface of safety container. Soldering iron tip is also crooked. I dont the reaction that

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

It's just click bait. Move on. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > The usual ranting of Ethan Siegel against anomalies that don't respect > theory. > > >

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

Brilliant smackdown: http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/08/the-em-drive-nasas-impossible-engine-highlights-our-greatest-failing/?commentId=comment_blogAndPostId/blog/comment/4033-120-22 On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > What's

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

Siegelwell.doubt that he even cares about this Oct Paper: https://www.academia.edu/17964553/Condensed_Matter_Nuclear_Science_October_2015 Per Aspera...Ad Astra, Ron..I would rather have my mind opened by the joy of discovery..than closed by my beliefs Siegel mission was a conclusion

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

Hmm permalink didn't work, but here it is: Alain Coetmeur 4 hours ago EmDrive phenomenon is still uncertain, and may well be an unimagined artifact. Unimagined because until now, no artifact was able toe explain the result, and EmDrive phenomenon was replicated. Ethan Siegel, as usual give

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

And then try: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDlyg_9m7tk On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:24 AM, John Berry wrote: > Perhaps because of this breakthrough? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmlAYnFF_s8 > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:08 AM, jjam...@gmail.com

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

Perhaps because of this breakthrough? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmlAYnFF_s8 On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:08 AM, jjam...@gmail.com wrote: > I exploded two button batteries by heating through soldering iron. > Explosion is spectacular, maybe comparable to amno. When

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

Eric, if that's your theory, it should probably account for all the metals doing this though. Under the right circumstances Aluminium, Iron (or thermite) all the alkaline metals at the very minimum explode with water or ice in the right circumstances. Consider too water arc explosions, it is

RE: [Vo]:Faraday to challenge Tesla

There seems to be a notion among futurists, probably slightly incorrect, that “driverless” vehicle is the next-big-thing in automotive, and especially in the “alternative-taxi” segment. Perhaps we should could refine this into a more likely version, by saying “virtually driverless” or not

Re: [Vo]:Faraday to challenge Tesla

Jones Beene wrote: > By “not quite” there is a likely scenario where there is both an > intelligent control system in the car itself - but also a cadre of “remote > drivers” in an office somewhere (preferably local, instead of India). And > all interactions are recorded, of

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: The usual ranting of Ethan Siegel against anomalies that don't respect > theory. > Ethan Siegel's argument in this instance is essentially an argument from authority -- the authorities are right, so the cold fusion

RE: [Vo]:Faraday to challenge Tesla

The fact that there is a China connection to the Faraday/Apple automotive venture should come as no surprise. It is the obvious partial answer to the “how and why” question, as explained here: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/542111/how-might-apple-manufacture-a-car/ In short, they

[Vo]:good LENR co-deposition news LENR/LENR+ info

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/11/09-nov-2015-info-and-lenr-by-co.html normal living Blog activity Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

Too bad, a beautiful theory and all that. I wonder if Rossi style LENR is based on a sub-critical level of this same effect? Rossi does say there is an electrical output. Look at the Thor's hammer video (so doable), if this has the current claimed, current that outstrips a lightning strike by a

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

I wrote: Thermite has aluminum in it, so the above reaction for aluminum could > apply. That makes lithium the party crasher. > It did occur to me, however, that lithium does not violently explode in water in the same way that the others do. It just kind of sets on fire and burns. This could

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, John Berry wrote: Eric, if that's your theory, it should probably account for all the metals > doing this though. > > Under the right circumstances Aluminium, Iron (or thermite) all the > alkaline metals at the very minimum explode with

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:35 AM, John Berry wrote: I wonder if Rossi style LENR is based on a sub-critical level of this same > effect? > I do not think beta decay could account for much of what was seen in the Lugano test. It could not explain the shift in the ratio

[Vo]:Check this out - Nature 1999

This is from the journal Nature in 1999 – and it reads like “déjà vu all over again”… since it was done with a table top laser and clusters of deuterium - but is hot fusion on a small scale – ICF … and way ahead of its time … since it is also very much like Holmlid’s claims, with one notable

Re: [Vo]:Check this out - Nature 1999

Check this out - Nature 1999It seems the 1999 experimenters thought that neutrons were the cause or result of the reaction that was observed. >>>“We achieve an efficiency of about 105 fusion neutrons per joule of incident >>>laser energy, which approaches the efficiency of large-scale

RE: [Vo]:Check this out - Nature 1999

Right, Bob. It looks like the dense deuterium essentially permits a comparatively slow laser pulse to break up nucleons instead of fusing them - which is ironic. (in more ways than one). More from less. The bad news is that it hasn’t been duplicated by a most interested party who has

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:24 PM, John Berry wrote: Perhaps because of this breakthrough? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmlAYnFF_s8 > The narrator identifies the explosion that occurs as sodium is dropped in water as being due to a Coulomb explosion. I was

Re: [Vo]:ADGEX Flashlight Creators Announce USB PowerBank

Hi Vort-list: It seems that the Adgex Energy TACHYON product might not be as expensive as I expected it to be (what with Steorn charging 1200€ for a USB-self-charger that-never-runs-out, I was expecting TACHYON to be 500-1000-5000$ or more). Fingers crossed that the TACHYON will come out soon.

[Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

The usual ranting of Ethan Siegel against anomalies that don't respect theory. http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/08/the-em-drive-nasas-impossible-engine-highlights-our-greatest-failing/ one day we will have to tell him what is science.