Ron, nice citation, supports relativistic interpretations as a factor in all
these anomalies, Podkletnov’s spinning superconductor comes to mind first, then
Jan Naudts paper on relativistic hydrogen, then Shawyers EM drive but beyond
that I think it may provide the math we need to understand
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/12/dec-12-2015-lenr-pro-campaign-learning.html
this is just a start of an idea
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Very similar to my ideas.
This is the same line of thinking that can produce a conclusion of negative
impedance in a non-inductive coil with a high negative charge.
I had never studied the idea for propulsive forces.
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:05 AM, H Ucar wrote:
>
BTW, presuming things scale linearly with velocity (but it could be better)
if you ran his test setup at 100,000 RPM and 500KV which still would not be
the limit of plausible engineering you would have 500 Newtons of force.
That's 51kg of force, which would sound enough for antigravity, and a
Thinking about it, his test seems to me to be a verification of the aether.
Forgetting his magical coating as we don't know what that is or how or why
it works...
What he has is 2 oppositely charged disks, one rotating and one not.
If we take the view of a stationary aether, then the top disk
http://displacementfieldtechnologies.com/specifications
The website of Richard Banduric show a device producing 0.1 Newton thrust. The
setup remind me rotating disc experiments of Vladimir Samokhvalov which were
available on youtube.
Greetings Vortex-L,
I see that nobody mentioned Col Rex Schlicher,USAF,ret., EM Patent:
https://www.google.com/patents/US5142861
Ad astra,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Doylestown PA
Greetings Vortex-L,
Perhaps, similarly:
http://www.electrogravityphysics.com/html/rotating.html
Ron Kita,Chiralex
Doylestown PA
8 matches
Mail list logo