On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
I do not think there was any report of very much Zn in the fuel. If there
> was Zn-64 in the samples tested it was not apparent from the report. In
> fact as I noted yesterday, Zn was on the order of 01 percent. It was
From: Bob Cook
I doubt that the mass spec readings would have had such a peak at 64 given the
low concentration of Zn reported.
That’s because the zinc was labeled as nickel. Both the charts on page 14 and
15 show the enrichment of 64Ni at 4.4% -- but now Parkhomov explains that
I doubt that the mass spec readings would have had such a peak at 64 given the
low concentration of Zn reported.
Bob Cook
From: Eric Walker
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 7:24 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016
RE: [Vo]: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickelI do not think
there was any report of very much Zn in the fuel. If there was Zn-64 in the
samples tested it was not apparent from the report. In fact as I noted
yesterday, Zn was on the order of 01 percent. It was not anyway
This is an interesting video. He takes a load off of the Orbo, and
watches the voltage increase.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UbKcgyCVzI#t=14.024172
Craig
On 03/28/2016 10:33 PM, Craig Haynie wrote:
Now that we are learning the 64Zn could be an active isotope for thermal gain
in the glow-tube (assuming no measurement errors) it should be noted that this
is the most common isotope of zinc but is slightly radioactive with an
extremely long half-life. It does not need to be enriched.
The
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/03/29/ecw-orbo-testing-week-8-orbo-cell-now-behaving-according-to-steorns-claims/
Craig
I wrote:
This observation [of a change in the number of nucleons] is what lead to an
> earlier comment of mine that there might be a large experimental
> uncertainty. Or there's something changing the number of nucleons for 64Zn
> and/or 64Ni, in which case I personally have no conjecture to
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Obviously, the next questions are something like this: was the depletion of
> the zinc-64 (compared to the starting level) due to its slight inherent
> radioactivity, and was the decay vastly accelerated? If so, then we
Bob Greenyer got this answer back from Parkhomov on the "64Ni" question (Sochi
results).
"About high content of 64Ni. We assume that in fact an impurity 64Zn was
registered. Mass spectrometer cannot distinguish between these two isotopes."
That could be big news… This could be a major
If the cooling effect is real then could also be indicative of an
unfamiliar form of energy storage.
Harry
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> @Vibrator,
>
>
>
> As you imply, some form of negative hysteresis would be the Holy Gail for
> alternative
And if the magnetic field increases sufficiently, it tends to create a
one-dimensional space. The rules for interaction of quantum systems change.
All the energy states allowed by a coherent system change drastically.
Resonances change along with the changing magnetic field. Electrons and
Here's a refutation of the recent gravitation wave measurementsGravity Waves
found? 14 Years NOTHING, but "find" it on 100-year Einstein publishing
anniversary https://youtu.be/PBpMQ564cWQ Pioneering the Applications of
Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On
>>>I have an issue with symmetrical time dilation which seems to defy common
>>>sense . I myself became confused on the issue
the problem is that there is a contradiction in the maths as I show at-
Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its connection to Newton
| |
| | |
@Vibrator,
As you imply, some form of negative hysteresis would be the Holy Gail for
alternative energy – better than LENR. I am not sure that it is fundamentally
contrary to ferromagnetism, so much as requiring a core which has both
antiferromagnetic domains or zones which are juxtaposed
5 things Einstein got totally wrong
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
5 things Einstein got totally wrong
Relativity is now a centerpiece of modern physics, the reason GPS satellites
and mobile internet exist, and why ... | |
|
|
I have an issue with symmetrical time
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-28-2016-lenr-comments-and-info.html
Great contributions, one from a far continent the other from a less far
sub-continent- blessed the Internet for connecting fast with friends
everywhere!
Things are developing and this will be accelerated soon.
Peter
Removing rust and paint with a laser
https://www.facebook.com/ScienceNaturePage/videos/799474420184818/?hc_location=ufi
Harry
Interesting thoughts from Jones here - certain viscosity effects result in
systems with time-dependent net energies - and negative hysteresis losses
would indeed be OU, since the "induced" B field would be automatically
changing under zero applied H field, and a freely-alternating
(time-varying)
I have a recent discussion of physics forums on these experiments, rather
informative, for whom is interested.
https://www.physicsforums.com/conversations/bound-states-of-spinning-magnets.80338/
20 matches
Mail list logo