I am just bring into focus what the theory of Rossi's case is...the
avoidance of the $Billion payment in licence fees. It has nothing to with
Rossi's tech not working. If IH claims that Rossi's IP does not work, they
will lose their case since their duly authorized agent who designed and
conducted
Axil Axil wrote:
The theory of the case is centered on the $Billion that IH would save is
> they could somehow use Rossi's IP in their own products and that of their
> OEMs but avoid paying 1 billion dollars in licensing fees.
>
This theory is bonkers. The machine DOES NOT WORK. It does not prod
a.ashfield wrote:
> I can believe solar panels show a return for the owner - with sufficient
> public subsidies.
>
Yes. Fortunately, the public subsidies for solar panels are far smaller
than they are for coal or nuclear power. Imagine if we had to kill 20,000
people a year to make solar panels
The theory of the case is centered on the $Billion that IH would save is
they could somehow use Rossi's IP in their own products and that of their
OEMs but avoid paying 1 billion dollars in licensing fees.
This theory explains why IH did not care how the one year test was
performed because they ne
I am developing my opinion of what Rossi's opinion of the case is.
“A theory of a case is a cogent statement of an advocate’s position that
justifies the verdict he or she is seeking. A theory of the case is not
necessarily cast in the words that will be sued with the jury, but words
that are hear
If IH can somehow use the IP of Rossi but get out of the licence agreement
with Rossi, they will save one $billion. This may explain the motivation in
the actions of IH. This is just a theory of the case.
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Their motivation makes sense if they ne
Their motivation makes sense if they never intended to take the results of
the one year test seriously. They did not care what the EVR did, they had
Rossi's IP in hand that they could transfer to their own products and that
of their other EOMs.
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Craig Haynie
wrote:
to be clear it is long ago proven that hormesis is real, thet there is
structural threshold in genotoxic effects, ...
As much as LENR is long time measured, ormesis and threshold are measured.
much meter tha Rossi's calorimetry.
every 6 month someone say that we have at last found that, and nobod
Craig Haynie wrote:
The other thing that confuses me, is that in the contract they signed with
> Rossi, they didn't have a clause which allowed them to independently
> evaluate the device; nor did it allow them to certify, or reject, the
> evaluation of the EVR; and they agreed to Rossi's guy, Pe
Axil Axil wrote:
The product strategy of IH can be deduced from their actions as follows. IF
> Rossi's IP never worked, IH would have terminated the test within days of
> its start. . . .
>
Stop right there. Even in these first sentences you have already made
unwarranted assumptions about events
On 05/13/2016 04:20 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
What confuses the analysis of the motives of IH is that IH patented
the Lugano device, as Rossi's IP. This indicated that IH knew that
Rossi's IP worked and gave Rossi credit for it in a patent
application, I cannot figure out their motive here??? It
What confuses the analysis of the motives of IH is that IH patented the
Lugano device, as Rossi's IP. This indicated that IH knew that Rossi's IP
worked and gave Rossi credit for it in a patent application, I cannot
figure out their motive here??? It could b that their was a management
disconnect
Adrian--
$17,600 plus about $5,000 for roof replacement (it was 28 years old with
three layers of shingles). The design work was about 2000 and the panels
and installation about 15,000. It will take about 5 years to get my
investment in the solar panels back. The panels are warranted for 25
The product strategy of IH can be deduced from their actions as follows. IF
Rossi's IP never worked, IH would have terminated the test within days of
its start. If IH believed that Rossi;s IP worked, they would have started
setting up a production plant early on to get a jump on E-Cat production
be
Axil Axil wrote:
> IH cannot use Rossi's IP for anything as its stands now.
>
IH (and I) think that Rossi's gadget does not work, so he does not have any
IP, so this does not matter. No one can use pretend IP for anything, as it
stands now, and as it will always stand.
If Rossi's IP is used i
IF and when IH pays Rossi the 89 million, what does IH get? IH gets the
right to use Rossi's IP to produce and sell E Cat product in their
territory granted by the Licence.
IH cannot use Rossi's IP for anything as its stands now.
Can IH sell product that contains Rossi's IP that has been incorpor
In his latest travesty of a blog, Peter Gluck wrote:
"However I think his anger has a deeper cause- he is wanting or being
> pushed somehow to defend IH's very unnatural, surprising and implausible
> position so he has to tell difficultly believable things- he also does not
> know much about IH's
The European Physical Society will hold a cold fusion session if 40 people
sign up for it. So sign up if you are interested. The meeting will be on
July 9 in Leuven, Belgium. See:
https://kuleuvencongres.be/eps2016/scientific-program/satellite_meeting
*Proposed Satellite Meeting to the 43rd EPS
Bob,
How much did the 16 panel installation cost?
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-13-2016-lenr-about-feline-nature-of.html
still discussions but slowly cooling down, some info and news
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Adrian-
I also own 16 solar panels. Since they were installed on May 4, 2016 I have
earned about $100 for the energy I have produced. The current power being
generated is at 3 kw at 9:30 in the morning. I should do about 25 kwh
today at about $0.63 / kwh. :) With a $5500 tax credit or m
Chris Zell,
"And, yes, I own solar panels."
I can believe solar panels show a return for the owner - with sufficient
public subsidies.
Patrick Ellul wrote:
Jed,
>
> If it is a matter of calorimetry as you insist, why would they ever settle
> out of court?
>
I only say that because people often settle out of court. Their lawyers may
advise them to do that to save money.
Rossi will never accept that it did not work at all.
>
W
I agree. There is too much assumption that harm created by pollution or
radiation is perfectly linear, down to tiny amounts. There doesn't seem to be
any allowance for hormesis. And, yes, I own solar panels.
-Original Message-
From: a.ashfield [mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net]
Sent: T
24 matches
Mail list logo