See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bumUw0lNOz0
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Yet, after Srinivasan went back to BARC/India in 1996, he again found tritium.
Tritium is considered by many to be the gold standard of proof for LENR. There
is no rational way to explain away the appearance of tritium – even if excess
heat can’t be measured. That was the same year Thermacore
Jones Beene wrote:
>
> This is where I differ from Jed’s negative assessment: Rossi appears to
> me to have achieved modest thermal gain in some of his testing, as have
> others using basically the same theory of operation.
>
He might have in some of his tests. I cannot rule
a.ashfield wrote:
Jed. "Rossi is not a reliable source of information."
>
> Do you really maintain there is not a test of the QuarkX going on now?
>
I have no earthly idea. But in the past he often claimed to be doing tests
he was not doing, setting up production lines
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:34 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
Like you, I suspect the COP has been exaggerated but perhaps not as much as
> you suggest. I believe the contract for the 1 MW plant called for a COP>4.
The license agreement talked about a COP of 4. The second
Jones Beene,
If Rossi is a fraud he has fooled me. Maybe because of his excitement
over the last few months I feel more optimistic than I have for a
while. I hope he has figured out how to run the Quark at a higher
temperature without it running away. This should provide a higher COP
and
In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 30 May 2016 21:56:46 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>One would think that the astronomers have cataloged enough stars during the
>original research project to know how the variable ones behave. Of course it
>is entirely possible that what they are seeing is a
The Quark… strange and charming… or another downer?
This could be a brilliant tactic on Rossi’s part – if he has anything real to
show to the world this time. It is possibly his last chance at redemption, and
he surely realizes the position he is in. The legal papers from IH (the answer
and
Daniel, "I think Rossi's costumer this time is his company's branch at
UK, right?"
The story is that it is a Swedish customer (or possible partner),
possibly ABS. I don't know where the test is being carried out.
LENR depends on the advances of materials science
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-01-2016-lenr-more-than-alliance.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
I think Rossi's costumer this time is his company's branch at UK, right?
2016-06-01 13:19 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield :
> Hank Mills gives a few more details and some speculation about the QuarkX
> test.At least we will learn something from it. Silence will mean
> failure.
Hank Mills gives a few more details and some speculation about the
QuarkX test.At least we will learn something from it.Silence will mean
failure.More tests will indicate there are still some problems.Rossi has
stated he would comment “within ten days.”Not long compared to the one
year trial.
Jed. "Rossi is not a reliable source of information."
Do you really maintain there is not a test of the QuarkX going on now?
13 matches
Mail list logo