[Vo]:Running on lava

2016-06-01 Thread Daniel Rocha
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bumUw0lNOz0 -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com

RE: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread Jones Beene
Yet, after Srinivasan went back to BARC/India in 1996, he again found tritium. Tritium is considered by many to be the gold standard of proof for LENR. There is no rational way to explain away the appearance of tritium – even if excess heat can’t be measured. That was the same year Thermacore

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: > > This is where I differ from Jed’s negative assessment: Rossi appears to > me to have achieved modest thermal gain in some of his testing, as have > others using basically the same theory of operation. > He might have in some of his tests. I cannot rule

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread Jed Rothwell
a.ashfield wrote: Jed. "Rossi is not a reliable source of information." > > Do you really maintain there is not a test of the QuarkX going on now? > I have no earthly idea. But in the past he often claimed to be doing tests he was not doing, setting up production lines

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread Eric Walker
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:34 PM, a.ashfield wrote: Like you, I suspect the COP has been exaggerated but perhaps not as much as > you suggest. I believe the contract for the 1 MW plant called for a COP>4. The license agreement talked about a COP of 4. The second

RE: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread a.ashfield
Jones Beene, If Rossi is a fraud he has fooled me. Maybe because of his excitement over the last few months I feel more optimistic than I have for a while. I hope he has figured out how to run the Quark at a higher temperature without it running away. This should provide a higher COP and

Re: [Vo]:The most mysterious star in the universe

2016-06-01 Thread mixent
In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 30 May 2016 21:56:46 -0400: Hi, [snip] >One would think that the astronomers have cataloged enough stars during the >original research project to know how the variable ones behave. Of course it >is entirely possible that what they are seeing is a

RE: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread Jones Beene
The Quark… strange and charming… or another downer? This could be a brilliant tactic on Rossi’s part – if he has anything real to show to the world this time. It is possibly his last chance at redemption, and he surely realizes the position he is in. The legal papers from IH (the answer and

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread a.ashfield
Daniel, "I think Rossi's costumer this time is his company's branch at UK, right?" The story is that it is a Swedish customer (or possible partner), possibly ABS. I don't know where the test is being carried out.

[Vo]:strong connection LENR- materials science

2016-06-01 Thread Peter Gluck
LENR depends on the advances of materials science http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-01-2016-lenr-more-than-alliance.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread Daniel Rocha
I think Rossi's costumer this time is his company's branch at UK, right? 2016-06-01 13:19 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield : > Hank Mills gives a few more details and some speculation about the QuarkX > test.At least we will learn something from it. Silence will mean > failure.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread a.ashfield
Hank Mills gives a few more details and some speculation about the QuarkX test.At least we will learn something from it.Silence will mean failure.More tests will indicate there are still some problems.Rossi has stated he would comment “within ten days.”Not long compared to the one year trial.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

2016-06-01 Thread a.ashfield
Jed. "Rossi is not a reliable source of information." Do you really maintain there is not a test of the QuarkX going on now?