Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

I wrote: > The fluid leaving Rossi's reactor room was just above 100 deg C. Returning > it was at 60 deg C. That is what Rossi told Lewan. The reservoir remained > level so it was the same water looping around. So if there was any process > heat in the next room, it came from a heat exchanger

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: > Jed. "The fluid leaving Rossi's reactor room was just above 100 deg C. " > Other sources say the temperature was ~104C in which case it would > probably be steam. > Not if there is any pressure. Which I am sure there was. 104 deg C = 219 deg F. 3

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jed. "I.H. did find a customer, but Rossi rejected that customer in favor of a fake company that he and his lawyer owned." Reference please. Jed. "The fluid leaving Rossi's reactor room was just above 100 deg C. " Other sources say the temperature was ~104C in which case it would probably

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Section 16.9 of the licence agreement allows for a party to suspended the agreement if any provision of the agreement is violated by the other party. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > I am not a lawyer. However, I believe at this moment Rossi has a

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: > Whatever the heat use by the customer, the arrangement was only made > because IH had failed to provide the customer for over a year that they > said they would. > I.H. did find a customer, but Rossi rejected that customer in favor of a fake company

[Vo]:functional undedrstanding of technology, additives- including those for LENR, material and human

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/07/jul-02-2016-functional-understanding-of.html but there is a dosis of dispute too...high on the Scoville Scale Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

The assessment below is right-on IMHO. I would also guess that some of the so-called trolls were funded by some vested interest. I think the funding must have been based on the number of words written multiplied by the blogs attended to. Also I would guess that there was a bonus for

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

There is a cacophony of petulant voices from those with a vested interest in Rossi. LENR, and Cold Fusion as made clear by the many who are behaving like jilted groupies at best with more than a few far over the line into becoming outrageous slanderous trolls. That Rossi has kept and keeps

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jones Beene, You make several assumptions that are far from proven. Whatever the heat use by the customer, the arrangement was only made because IH had failed to provide the customer for over a year that they said they would. Why do you think IH has any rights to the license when they still

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

From: Bob Higgins It is interesting and self-destructive that Rossi appears to have unilaterally declared that the license sold to IH is null and void. Having accepted money for that license, he is in a legally binding contract. Yet Rossi seems intent to market that license to others as