Hey Bob, you're a bit over my head here, so I'll pass on this one.
That's why I make the movies, so I can understand!
Ruby
On 7/10/16 1:24 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Axil and Ruby—
One feature of LENR that is neglected is the mechanism for
distribution of nuclear scale energy to the material
At 1:27:00 the calorimeter results state 144 In and 440 0ut. COP = 3.06
Mills claims 300-600 Kws out and 25 Kws in,
You can expect COP = 3 or less in the steady state.
Why is the a difference between actual and claimed power output.
There is a difference between instantaneous power and average
Axil and Ruby—
One feature of LENR that is neglected is the mechanism for distribution of
nuclear scale energy to the material around the reaction site without
destruction of the material by melting or mechanical deformation. Energetic
particles with significant kinetic energy do not fit the
E-cat World have a link to Brilliant Light Power's latest two hour demo
video to generate power @ 0.1 cents/kW.
Seems to me there are a lot of difficult engineering problems, so their
forecast of commercial units next year looks optimistic to me. Mills
argues that the device is sufficiently
Oh, those peaceful sweet Sundays, where have you vanished?
see please:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/07/jul-10-2016-what-means-to-care-for-lenr.html
All the best,
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
5 matches
Mail list logo