Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory
In reply to a.ashfield's message of Sun, 28 Aug 2016 18:01:40 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Reviewing Lewan's piece, with the videos by the Greenyer, linked below, >he makes a good case for process being basically the swap of a nickel's >electron by a hydrogen ion. >https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/03/07/finally-this-is-possibly-how-the-e-cat-works/ There are a couple of problems with this explanation as it stands. 1) The H- ion is considerably larger than a Hydrogen atom, and the second electron is only weakly bound to the atom. This would appear to make it unlikely that H- could "descend" through the electron orbitals of heavy atoms. (Shrunken H atom species not considered in this argument.) 2) Quote: "(Why isnt the energy released as high energy gamma radiation? Maybe because the proton is so close to the nucleus that it gets captured, without having a large kinetic energy as in hot fusion. Maybe also because the nickel atom is not free but fixed in a lattice?)" a) Absorption of a neutron can also be thought of as a form of fusion, and there are plenty of neutron absorption reactions where the neutron is slow moving, that nevertheless do produce gamma radiation. So the "slow moving" argument is probably wrong. b) The lattice probably has nothing to do with it, because there are plenty of solid chemicals that do produce gamma radiation from decay reactions. i.e. where radioactive atoms find themselves in a similar situation. 3) Quote: "If the distance is larger than 10-14 m, the proton is expelled from the metal atom through the repelling Coulomb force, with high kinetic energy (from 0 to 6.7 MeV) determined by Piantelli through calculation, and confirmed through cloud chamber experiments. NOTE: Piantelli has observed protons escaping from pre-processed nickel, well after the reaction has stopped." If the measured energy of the proton is 6.7 MeV, then a more likely reaction is: D + 58Ni => 59Ni + 1H + 6.775 MeV with the D being a minor contaminant in ordinary Hydrogen. 58Ni makes up the majority of all Ni atoms. The 59Ni is only very mildly radioactive (ec => neutrino), but produces no significant gamma rays. The proton would carry most of the energy of the initial reaction, which it would lose primarily through ionizing other atoms, resulting mostly in heat. However it would also produce some secondary gammas during a direct hit on a nearby nucleus. That's enough for now. :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory
There appears to be no OFAC certification in this instance. There's Henry Johnson's warranty that JM Chemicals is in compliance with OFAC (p. 25 of the complaint). There's no reason to think that JMC was in violation of OFAC by trading with an enemy of the US. Presumably what fraud there is would go back to the individuals named in the lawsuit and countersuit rather than a shell company. Eric On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > True, the IH/Rossi contrace is contingent upon te certification of the > customer. It would be stupid to misrepresent this certication, but anything > is possible if improbable. Such misrepresentation is a criminal offence. > > *How much are the fines for violating these regulations?* > The fines for violations can be substantial. Depending on the program, > criminal penalties for willful violations can include fines ranging up to > $20 million and imprisonment of up to 30 years. Civil penalties for > violations of the Trading With the Enemy Act can range up to $65,000 for > each violation. Civil penalties for violations of the International > Emergency Economic Powers Act can range up to $250,000 or twice the amount > of the underlying transaction for each violation. Civil penalties for > violations of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act can range up to > $1,075,000 for each violation. [10-08-13] > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Eric Walker > wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process? >>> >> >> How could one conclude that JM obtained OFAC certification? We go >> through this again. >> >> Eric >> >> >
Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory
True, the IH/Rossi contrace is contingent upon te certification of the customer. It would be stupid to misrepresent this certication, but anything is possible if improbable. Such misrepresentation is a criminal offence. *How much are the fines for violating these regulations?* The fines for violations can be substantial. Depending on the program, criminal penalties for willful violations can include fines ranging up to $20 million and imprisonment of up to 30 years. Civil penalties for violations of the Trading With the Enemy Act can range up to $65,000 for each violation. Civil penalties for violations of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act can range up to $250,000 or twice the amount of the underlying transaction for each violation. Civil penalties for violations of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act can range up to $1,075,000 for each violation. [10-08-13] On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process? >> > > How could one conclude that JM obtained OFAC certification? We go through > this again. > > Eric > >
Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Axil Axil wrote: How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process? > How could one conclude that JM obtained OFAC certification? We go through this again. Eric
Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory
How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process? On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > a.ashfield wrote: > > >> I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant >> that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat. The >> weight of evidence suggests that he has. >> > > The photos of the ceiling proves he has not produced anomalous heat. He > would dead if he had. > > The unanswered questions in Exhibit 5 and the blatant fraud in JM Chemical > company proves that he is a fraud. > > - Jed > > > >
Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory
Jed, Nobody has proven anything and you jump to conclusions. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > a.ashfield wrote: > > >> I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant >> that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat. The >> weight of evidence suggests that he has. >> > > The photos of the ceiling proves he has not produced anomalous heat. He > would dead if he had. > > The unanswered questions in Exhibit 5 and the blatant fraud in JM Chemical > company proves that he is a fraud. > > - Jed > > > >
Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory
a.ashfield wrote: > I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant > that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat. The > weight of evidence suggests that he has. > The photos of the ceiling proves he has not produced anomalous heat. He would dead if he had. The unanswered questions in Exhibit 5 and the blatant fraud in JM Chemical company proves that he is a fraud. - Jed
[Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory
Reviewing Lewan's piece, with the videos by the Greenyer, linked below, he makes a good case for process being basically the swap of a nickel's electron by a hydrogen ion. https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/03/07/finally-this-is-possibly-how-the-e-cat-works/ It seems to me this is a good explanation using known physics and Greenyer goes into detail of how this might happen. Axil will be pleased to note plasmons are featured. An electric field's effect apparently gets magnified by ten and Rossi has recently commented that after the initial warming all that is required is a field. I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat. The weight of evidence suggests that he has.
[Vo]:ANPA
if anyone is interested, this group has relaunched itself on the Internet ANPA (Alternative Natural Philosophy Association) Conference 2016 has now finished Next year Conference 2017 is provisionally planned for: Monday 7th – Friday 11th August 2017 preferred, possibly 1 week earlier. at: Rowlands Castle, United Kingdom see: http://anpa.onl/2016/anpa37-2016-conference-details/ contact is: ad...@anpa.onl ANPA formed 30+ years ago and seem based on aims of scientists like Pierre Noyes, see:H. Pierre Noyes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Aim was to have a Paradigm shift in science. Example of type of talks: Stephen Fry and Nick Greaves: Duplication theory ANPA 2015 The BiEntropy of Some Knots on the Simple Cubic Lattice -Grenville Croll ANPA Aug 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | The BiEntropy of Some Knots on the Simple Cubic Lattice ... | | | | View on www.youtube.com | Preview by Yahoo | | | | |
[Vo]:vision of LENR inspired by image of Mother Nature
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-28-2016-vision-of-lenr-mirrors.html A good coming week to you all! Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
