Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: And that's just a start. Once you start looking, there's *lots* of > information on the Internet about the mind control towers and how they > cause people to hear voices in their heads. > > And now we find out our very own Peter Gluck has been

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

On 09/12/2016 02:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Peter Gluck > wrote: "To learn who rules over you- simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize (Voltaire) Who are you talking about? Sounds like maybe his wife? Can't think

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Peter Gluck wrote: I am abstaining heroically to tell that your brain arteries are only half > full with blood. > A brain artery does not resemble an open pipe that pours water into an open reservoir, like the one used in Rossi's 1-year test. Contrary to your repeated

[Vo]:LENR discussions and info

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-12-2016-lenr-discussions-and-info.html very interesting contribution of AXIL! peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

and you beyond hope.. I am abstaining heroically to tell that your brain arteries are only half full with blood. the help is for readers peter On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Peter Gluck wrote: > > "To learn who rules

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Peter Gluck wrote: "To learn who rules over you- simply find out who you are not allowed to > criticize (Voltaire) > Who are you talking about? You are clearly allowed to criticize me! You have been criticizing me mindlessly for weeks, while ignoring the facts. > You

[Vo]:Working on a new type ot TV antenna now.

I have worked long and hard on cold fusion. It has been a long time past to try otherideas. I since broadened my focus. I now have several apps andI am working on a few more. My “tell meyour” dreams recording alarm cell phone alarm clock is getting closer torelease. Books are at

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Thing is with articles of this ilk - the thing they are talking about is perpetually going to happen Very soon or at least right now or maybe tomorrow. The goalposts just keep on moving. Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa. Http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/ // +358403703659 //

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

"To learn who rules over you- simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize (Voltaire) OIk, time out have finish my blog issue. You could better help with info from Japan re ICCF20 peter On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Peter Gluck

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Peter Gluck wrote: Those who are contradicting you. Who thinks, appreciates things differently. > For example citing you from memory: You can see who is your pressor > knowing whom you cannot contradict > > "A regarding the ERV report any sane individual instantly sees

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Those who are contradicting you. Who thinks, appreciates things differently. For example citing you from memory: You can see who is your pressor knowing whom you cannot contradict "A regarding the ERV report any sane individual instantly sees there was NO excess heat. You needed 5 minutes. IH has

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Edward Lewis, 80 Year Periodicity of Scientific Revolutions: "Scientific revolutions in physics have happened at about 80 year intervals since 1506 when Copernicus introduced a heliocentric physics, explaining the fall of objects as the impetus of objects. Since then, in response to the

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

They sure are out there! See this article: http://educate-yourself.org/mc/ And this: http://www.starshipearththebigpicture.com/2013/10/25/ever-seen-a-mind-control-tower-bet-you-have/ And that's just a start. Once you start looking, there's /lots/ of information on the Internet about the

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

"there's no mind-police out there trying to zap you" They're out there... http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2012/09/the-thought-police-are-coming-2464566.html On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Esa Ruoho wrote: > I think Jed is pretty on-the-nose with his

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

>>>I am fighting for the right to think differently History as I present: Copernican Revolution led to Existential Crisis; physical reality based on point-particle theory of Boscovich. Most people were not able to cope with that and had to retreat from full consequences of Copernican

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Peter Gluck wrote: > As regarding Jed, when he was a Cold Fusion supporter he fought for > thinking differently. > Now when he is also a Rossi opponent . . . > Many people who support cold fusion also oppose Rossi. You do not get to decide who supports cold fusion.

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Dear Esa, Thanks for your care and attention to my problems, but I am solving them, here it is how: (appended) As regarding Jed, when he was a Cold Fusion supporter he fought for thinking differently. Now when he is also a Rossi opponent he wants everybody to think as IH says it is thinking.

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

I think Jed is pretty on-the-nose with his comment. If Peter Gluck from Romania, is fighting for the right to think differently, then he probably knows who he is fighting against, and how they have shown themselves to him - who they are, what do they say, and how do they resist his right to think

Re: [Vo]:I am fighting for the right to think differently

Jed You asked; Who are you fighting? Who prevents you from thinking differently? Somtimes a question becomes A great answer. This reveals an enormous naive mindset. It also explains your inability to see that the truth has many appearances sometimes in conflict but true. Thanks for explaining