This is essentially the "SWAG" device of Murray-Smith. It is a salt water and
graphene electrolytic storage battery with high energy density. Video on YT.
On Monday, November 28, 2016 5:55 PM, "mix...@bigpond.com"
wrote:
In reply to Blaze Spinnaker's message of Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:
In reply to Blaze Spinnaker's message of Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:37:08 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161128152140.htm
Quote:
>For example, it should be possible to make "ice wires" that would be among the
>best carriers known for protons, because water conducts pr
In reply to Jack Cole's message of Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:39:59 +:
Hi,
[snip]
>Interesting association to the EM drive. Maybe it would produce
>reactionless thrust also?
>
>Assuming the EM drive actually works, this would be an ideal application
>for this kind of nuclear battery. I am assuming
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161128152140.htm
The discovery illustrates how even very familiar materials can drastically
change their behavior when trapped inside structures measured in
nanometers, or billionths of a meter.
Not so fast! The kow work function is great for cold cathode emission. However
the very high reesistivity prevents useful operation.
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Article: Diamonds turn nucle
- The definitive LENR experiment type.
nyone who want to understand LENR through experimentation is well served
by doing laser irradiation of gold nanoparticles in a solution of a salt of
a radioactive isotope as Andreev has done.
A comment on the The Andreev paper
docviewer.ya
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-28-2016-lenr-poor-think-vs-rich.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
And what was the story on Paul Brown? He claimed huge currents, not just
microamps from his devices.
Do we call him a fraud and move on? Or was he onto something big?
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]
This is really just the natural progression of betavoltaics, incorporating
"nano".
The niche has been around for many years as it is almost obvious... remember
Paul Brown and before?... Several of those betavoltaic proponents used to post
here (Brown passed away in 2001). The tech was always j
That's fantastic. If it works, it will be as good as cold fusion for small
scale devices such as hearing aids. I wonder if it can be powerful enough
for a cell phone?
- Jed
NB: De soto make an article about Mercantilism...
how economic elite obtain help by government to block competition
http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-real-enemy-for-trump-is-mercantilism-not-globalism-1480279192
the secret of economic rents, and what make people furious, from Tunisia to
rust belt.
Interesting association to the EM drive. Maybe it would produce
reactionless thrust also?
Assuming the EM drive actually works, this would be an ideal application
for this kind of nuclear battery. I am assuming this would be a very
expensive manufacturing process, but a battery working for 5000+
The radioactive carbon diamond is probably acting as a diode, making it a
self-powered diode. The beta emission would be similar to high voltage. It is a
good bet that the physical shape must be tapered and brings to mind the Shawyer
cavity.
Schottky diodes made of artificial diamond are known
Unified field theorytalks Lewis, E. The EightyYear Periodicity of Scientific
Revolutions and What It Means for the ColdFusion Field in ICCF - 14
InternationalConference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. 2008. Washington,
DC.Says: “In 1820, Faradayintroduced the basic ideas of field theory
i
Diamonds turn nuclear waste into nuclear batteries
http://flip.it/dKKukF
Scientific American copied the C&EN article on cold fusion. See:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cold-fusion-lives-on-with-experiments-creating-energy-when-none-should-exist/?ref=yfp
Alain, as usual a great analysis.
The only way in an UBI economy, we would not have a better distribution of
capital is that we let the establishment prevent natural development with
political conservation laws.
On Nov 27, 2016 18:11, "Alain Sepeda" wrote:
> from exchange it seems that one big p
17 matches
Mail list logo