[Vo]:more jobs are going away

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/technology/amazon-moves-to-cut-checkout-line-promoting-a-grab-and-go-experience.html Amazon Moves to Cut Checkout Line, Promoting a Grab-and-Go Experience The millions of jobs working the checkout lines are going to go away.

[Vo]:Spin liquids

An interesting new path opening up all about special quantum states found in Nature both in natural crystals and synthetics varieties. Quantum ‘spin liquids’ where there is a vast amount of entanglement going on… now of course such massive entanglement has always been what cold fusion required

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

a.ashfield wrote: I find it strange that you didn't know there were 2 MW of reactors in the > plant. > I do not know such details at all. The only thing I know about is the sample data. I immediately saw the problems in that data such as the pressure of 0.0 bar. The data

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

Jed, I find it strange that you didn't know there were 2 MW of reactors in the plant. I thought that was common knowledge.. The first set of the older design were what you saw in the photo montage that Rossi provided. (Nothing to do with Lugano - low temperature units) The second set of

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

a.ashfield wrote: > Jed, > Rossi had a double set of reactors in the 1 MW experiment. The standby > reactors were of the old design that you think may have worked. > No, I meant the little cylindrical one used in the first Levi tests:

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

Jed, Rossi had a double set of reactors in the 1 MW experiment. The standby reactors were of the old design that you think may have worked. If the four 250 kW units didn't work why did Rossi not use the backups? As far as is known they were never activated. On 12/5/2016 5:28 PM, Jed

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

Frank Znidarsic wrote: Jed how can Parkhomov claim successes by following Rossi when Rossi had > none? I suppose Parkhomov is mistaken, or misinformed about Rossi's work. There are several other possibilities -- Takahashi and others have tested finely divided nickel and

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

Jed how can Parkhomov claim successes by following Rossi when Rossi had none? Frank Z

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

Russ George wrote: > Within this social media miasma which this Vortex is the condemnation of > Rossi and name calling by nere-do-wells and armchair dilatants, aka trolls, > adds nothing positive to the development of science. > See the lawsuit Exhibit 5:

[Vo]:are the stagnators of LENR, unstoppable?

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-05-2016-can-we-stop-stagnators.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

RE: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

Well I guess I stand more with Bob that with Brian on this. As a working experimentalist in the field (like Brian, god bless him) I have plenty of things I wish (might demand) that Rossi (and a long list of other experimentalists) might do to make my life more interesting and exciting and save me

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

See below I also consider that Rossi has been able to improve upon the COP's of the system by finding compatible combinations of Li, H, Ni nano particle characteristics, and, primarily control circuit resonance to allow minimal energy input and long term self sustaining operations.

RE: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English

Higgins— I second Jed’s thanks for the AP paper translation. Its seems to nail down the results of 22 years (at least) of the Ni-H LENR system R S. Forcardi and other Italians should get the credit it seems to me. I also consider that Rossi has been able to improve upon the COP’s of the