Re: [Vo]:Could the future that started out as cold fusion be ... ta da... thorium fission ?

In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:10:33 +1100: Hi, [snip] >Solution:- Give the cylindrical reactor I mentioned earlier a thick end cap >made >of the same actinide as the blanket, and pass the incoming muon stream through >the end cap before it reaches the D-T

Re: [Vo]:Could the future that started out as cold fusion be ... ta da... thorium fission ?

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:19:52 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Eric - A paper can be downloaded here which I am now wading through, >which indicates that a type of internal conversion can occur with muons, >leading to fusion instead of beta decay. I suspect you meant

[Vo]:LENR THEORIES IN 4- LETTERS WORDS

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-28-2017-lenr-theories-in-4-letter.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area

Regarded LeClair's credibility. The Mosier-Boss and Forsley experiment lends credence to the LeClair claims of neutron production when the metalized material is accelerated into matter. The acceleration of the NAE in encased in pladium produces hot fusion effects as witnessed by the generation

Re: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area

The credibility issue with LeClair is something he must address if he wants positive recognition. As with AR, there is an overabundance of enticing talk but little reliable data, no peer reviewed publication, no independent replication, and lots of evasiveness. YouTube has spawned the era of

RE: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area

Way way south! From: Brian Ahern [mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com] Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 11:24 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area Mark LeClair's credibility is somewhere South of Rossi. He has made no demonstrations in over four

Re: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area

Mark LeClair's credibility is somewhere South of Rossi. He has made no demonstrations in over four years. From: Axil Axil Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:49 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic

Re: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area

More... http://www.waterconf.org/upload/LeClair%20Abstract%20WC2012.pdf The Water Crystal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce3vqlIGxvk At 34:00 into this video show, Mark LeClair, the president and driving force behind Nanospire begins his presentation describing the production of fusion using

Re: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area

Mark LeClair has characterized this water crystal which includes its isolation and photograph. Believe it or not. On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Russ George wrote: > Cavitating bubble collapse doesn’t produce metalized water. Long before > the density has risen to such

RE: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area

Cavitating bubble collapse doesn’t produce metalized water. Long before the density has risen to such levels the atoms within the collapsing bubble are very hot, upwards of tens of thousands of degrees, more than sufficient to be ionized hence the bubble if not filled with water rather ionized

Re: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area

Not only hydrogen can be metalized, so can water. The collapse of the cavitation bubble can produce pressor high enough to form the metalized water. IMHO, it is this metalized water that produces the erosion of the target material seen in cavitation. This metalized water can erode diamond. This

Re: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area

Axil, Seeing this reference to bubble fusion brings up the memory of Impulse Devices, Inc and Ross Tessien, the inventor who used to post here on Vortex a decade ago when it looked like acoustic cavitation was on the verge of success. They were located in Grass Valley CA - and even offered