Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Che wrote: > Was there, or was there not, cold fusion occurring, in Rossi's apparatus? > At any time? > Probably not, but we cannot be sure. There are some positive reports such as: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGindication.pdf Unfortunately, this was followed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Mary Yugo said he was contacted by investors looking to verify Rossi. He told them what to test for, and Rossi never had anything to do with them. The only way Rossi is going to find an investor now is to have the darned thing tested with true independence, like an investor bringing you along.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > I with the crook will be prevented to be a nuisance again... > whoever you think it is (I have an opinion). > I truly doubt matters are that simple. Was there, or was there not, cold fusion occurring, in Rossi's

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > I think that, because things were kept in secret, it will keep going with, > perhaps, more steam (pun intended, LOL!!!). > Secrecy -- the utter bane of scientific research AND democracy -- is wholly a factor in all

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Kevin O'Malley wrote: If Rossi has managed to be the great magician that his detractors claim, > his next set of investors might think about bringing a thermometer to the > test. > No can do. He invited me to a test. I said I would bring a thermometer. * He told me I would

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

If Rossi has managed to be the great magician that his detractors claim, his next set of investors might think about bringing a thermometer to the test. "For want of a nail the kingdom was lost" becomes "for want of a thermometer the truth was lost." On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Brian Ahern

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Abd reports that Darden was the only one who wasn't smiling. He probably had bigger legal fees. On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Abd reports the trial was settled. Or called off. Withdrawn. I do not know > what this means in legal terms. See: > >

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Che wrote: > My take on the major factor which led to the withdrawal of claims is that >> Rossi's attorney finally realized that he could not ethically put Rossi on >> the stand and let Rossi testify to those details which were in the >> deposition but which were so

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Brian Ahern wrote: > I think LENR has been damaged grievously. > I think so too. I hope I.H. can get back into the game. > Rossi will probably highlight the Quark X. All his followers should invest > immediately before the rush! > I gather he is already lining up new

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Note that Abd revised & expanded his blog entry. Here is my take. This is what I wrote at LENR Forum: "Thank goodness. I wish Rossi had gotten his comeuppance publicly, but more than that I dreaded the possibility that he might win. I wish they had settled long ago. What a terrible waste of

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

I think LENR has been damaged grievously. Rossi will probably highlight the Quark X. All his followers should invest immediately before the rush! From: Daniel Rocha Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:02 PM To: John Milstone Subject: Re:

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

I think that, because things were kept in secret, it will keep going with, perhaps, more steam (pun intended, LOL!!!). 2017-07-05 13:55 GMT-03:00 Alain Sepeda : > I with the crook will be prevented to be a nuisance again... > whoever you think it is (I have an opinion). >

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

I with the crook will be prevented to be a nuisance again... whoever you think it is (I have an opinion). 2017-07-05 18:50 GMT+02:00 Daniel Rocha : > So much drama for nothing... >

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

So much drama for nothing...

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > Everyone will have an opinion, but the details are not public. I suspect > that some of the details will seep out over time. > > My take on the major factor which led to the withdrawal of claims is that > Rossi's attorney

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Everyone will have an opinion, but the details are not public. I suspect that some of the details will seep out over time. My take on the major factor which led to the withdrawal of claims is that Rossi's attorney finally realized that he could not ethically put Rossi on the stand and let

Re: [Vo]:Rossi v. Darden

Kevin O'Malley wrote: > Does your concept of reading the depositions apply to someone who claims > to be a lawyer? > I do not understand this question. I referred to the depositions by Smith, which are technical: EXPERT REPORT OF RICK A. SMITH, P.E., Document 235-1

[Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Abd reports the trial was settled. Or called off. Withdrawn. I do not know what this means in legal terms. See: http://coldfusioncommunity.net/ RvD settled! All claims and counterclaims withdrawn. Jury dismissed. Agreement, if any, was private. Full details, such as I have, when I get home.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi v. Darden

Jed: I'm responding here because I'm not allowed to respond at LENR forum for 2 weeks. Does your concept of reading the depositions apply to someone who claims to be a lawyer? WoodWorker claimed to be a lawyer and in his intro made a big deal about Penon not showing up to back up his report.