Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:08 PM Vibrator ! wrote: > > Shame, i was learning so much, right up until they banned me.. > They banned you? I've never seen anyone banned there. What do you mean you can't post? Harrumph. I'll look into this.

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

Moletrap's great - i've already found out that momentum ISN'T conserved - there's actually a time delay between a change in MoI and the resulting change in velocity! Did you know that? I certainly didn't! So net system momentum just comes and goes, as a function of time! Furthermore,

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

Yeah, no, sorry, me and Frank don't really follow eachother's stuff, much (hi Frank!) - it actually began on the BWF - i'm, uhh, trying to 'elevate' it from there, however - smashing bunch that they are.. One member - Fletcher - understands work / energy equivalence, multiplying forces and

RE: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

The discussion of a violation of the conservation of energy or angular momentum perked up my curiosity. I have searched many times for a trick that gets around the rules to no avail. So, I decided to simulate a simple yet elegant model system that I think might be of interest to the group. My

Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion may fade by 2024

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:20:03 + (UTC): Hi Jones, [snip] >Do you see where this is going? If not, let me a little more direct: does a >"burning bush" come to mind ?  or crop circles? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success

RE: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion may fade by 2024

Many are not familiar with the burning bush idea, particularly about 60% of American society—maybe closer to 90%. FRC Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Jones Beene Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 7:20:03 AM

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

On my 80th birth my children has some packs of cards made with the pictures of my 54 grandchildren. I don't bother to keep track of the number of great grandchildren because it keeps changing.  The 88 relates to Rommel's anti-aircraft gun. which was so effective in the western desert.

Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion may fade by 2024

Terry Blanton wrote: > Either there are Watchers or we're damned lucky bugs.   Ah... the Watchers. Here is a new twist. The concept of a "Watcher" as a base level intergalactic probe incorporating advance AI is fascinating. After all, there is little doubt that the expected cost of

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

Good to hear from you, Frank. Is the '88' in your email address your current age of your number of grandchildren? I'll never catch up with only 4 but they have produced 3 great grandchildren. Last I heard, McCarthy was getting into Bitcoin. Don't know if he was a miner or just a trader.

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

Wrong. I fear I could never understand Vibrator. You are right about Not the Steorn Forum. Cynics all, apart from Tim I wonder how Shawn (the real spelling on his birth certificate according to the Alesbury registrar) is getting on. On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 13:37, Terry Blanton wrote: > > > On

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 7:06 AM Vibrator ! wrote: > > > Sorry to bump my own thread, bad form.. > Some suggestions: Look up Frank Grimer. He hangs out at the Besseler Wheel forum: https://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/ and will be delighted to hear of your discovery. and Contact the

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

Sorry to bump my own thread, bad form.. only i'm really kind of itching for any progress here (at wits end!).. It's a big ask, i know - the sims may look a bit mysterious but it's really extremely simple: - The system energy doubles. The most obvious reason would seem to be work done by the