Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory
Communism/Fascism is great for quarantining. Not sure it's that great for sharing critical information broadly, coming up with vaccines, medical tests and and treatments. On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 6:52 AM Jed Rothwell wrote: > That was a superb presentation by Bruce Aylward. Jones: thanks for > pointing it out. > > I must ruefully admit that Chinese communism does seem well suited for > dealing with this. But, more than that, what Aylward emphasized is the > scientific, rational, pragmatic, data-driven approach. That's as much part > of U.S., European and Japanese culture as it is Chinese. I'd like to think > so, anyway. > > It is unfortunate that the U.S. effort will be headed up by nitwits who > don't even believe in the Theory of Evolution. This is like assigning > energy policy to someone who has no idea where electricity comes from. > > It is unfortunate, but I hope not disastrous. I hope they stay out of the > way and let qualified people do their jobs. I fear that even the qualified > people will ignore the lessons from China. > >
Re: [Vo]:Fwd: A good model makes accurate predictions
In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Sat, 29 Feb 2020 20:33:43 + (UTC): Hi, >The mathematics of my model came before I had the words to describe it. Out >of the model came this mega-hertz meter relationship. Someone on vortex told >me that megahertz-meter was a velocity. With that I found later that it is >the velocity of sound in the nucleus. Thanks. [snip] You're welcome. :) [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success
[Vo]:Fwd: A good model makes accurate predictions
The mathematics of my model came before I had the words to describe it. Out of the model came this mega-hertz meter relationship. Someone on vortex told me that megahertz-meter was a velocity. With that I found later that it is the velocity of sound in the nucleus. Thanks. A dimension of 1.35 Fermis came with that. Jones to me that this length was to large to be of a nucleon. I later found that the number was to three significant digits the Fermi displacement length of a nucleon. Now I know what it means.The model was not wrong, I just did not know what it meant. This also suggested the vibrationally reinforced condensates must exist. I was told this was a no no because vibrations would tear up the cooper pairs. How did the cooper pairs react to vibration? Now I know that no cooper pairs are required. I have changed my text to read, Vibrationally coupled Bose condensates, no cooper pairs are required. What about those nasty W and Z particles? How do they fit in? I reworked the calculations and discovered that no W and Zs are required within the cold fusion reaction. With every adjustment the model becomes more main stream and precise. The impact of the work; however, has been zero. Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: Frank Znidarsic To: vortex-l Sent: Sat, Feb 29, 2020 2:40 pm Subject: A good model makes accurate predictions I worte my book in 2012. At that time I described a vibrationally reinforced Bose condensate. This had to exist within my model if cold fusion was real. Now others have descirbed this but they call it an excition condensate. https://revolution-green.com/scientists-predict-state-matter-can-conduct-electricity-energy-perfectly/ https://www.quantamagazine.org/taming-superconductors-with-string-theory-20160121/ I also described the frequency of this bonage with my megahertz-meter relationship. They are not there yet. Frank Z
[Vo]:A good model makes accurate predictions
I worte my book in 2012. At that time I described a vibrationally reinforced Bose condensate. This had to exist within my model if cold fusion was real. Now others have descirbed this but they call it an excition condensate. https://revolution-green.com/scientists-predict-state-matter-can-conduct-electricity-energy-perfectly/ https://www.quantamagazine.org/taming-superconductors-with-string-theory-20160121/ I also described the frequency of this bonage with my megahertz-meter relationship. They are not there yet. Frank Z
[Vo]:first in US to die from Crona Virous
https://www.tribdem.com/news/man-in-washington-state-first-in-u-s-to-die/article_bf60896a-c775-5c31-b463-c6fb2d8f56aa.html and Trump says its a hoax.
Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory
Effective virus control: https://i.imgur.com/PODhq9N.jpg
Re: [Vo]:More on the WuFlu conspiracy theory
That was a superb presentation by Bruce Aylward. Jones: thanks for pointing it out. I must ruefully admit that Chinese communism does seem well suited for dealing with this. But, more than that, what Aylward emphasized is the scientific, rational, pragmatic, data-driven approach. That's as much part of U.S., European and Japanese culture as it is Chinese. I'd like to think so, anyway. It is unfortunate that the U.S. effort will be headed up by nitwits who don't even believe in the Theory of Evolution. This is like assigning energy policy to someone who has no idea where electricity comes from. It is unfortunate, but I hope not disastrous. I hope they stay out of the way and let qualified people do their jobs. I fear that even the qualified people will ignore the lessons from China.
