Re: [Vo]:Muons: 'Strong' evidence found for a new force of nature
It is possible that whatever it is Cambridge may have found relative to muons also relates to surprisingly efficient muon production in the Holmlid/Norront reactor... apparently there is a mystery particle which affects muons in a previously unknown way ? BTW from their site, Norront have 3 muon reactors working in Norway and one in Sweden. Things are getting interesting... This whole UDD > muon thing may be near, or even gone past the proverbial "tipping point"... when we look back on it in a couple of years. Jones H LV wrote: PBS Space Time Why the Muon g-2 Results Are So Exciting! https://youtu.be/O4Ko7NW2yQo Harry Muons: 'Strong' evidence found for a new force of natur https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677 quotes: There is currently a one in a 40,000 chance that the result could be a statistical fluke - equating to a statistical level of confidence described as 4.1 sigma. A level of 5 sigma, or a one in 3.5 million chance of the observation being a coincidence, is needed to claim a discovery. Prof Ben Allanach, from Cambridge University, who was not involved with the latest effort, said: "My Spidey sense is tingling and telling me that this is going to be real. The Muon g-2 experiment involves sending the particles around a 14-metre ring and then applying a magnetic field. Under the current laws of physics, encoded in the Standard Model, this should make the muons wobble at a certain rate. Instead, the scientists found that muons wobbled at a faster rate than expected. This might be caused by a force of nature that's completely new to science.Harry
[Vo]:Valuation-wise - Is Norront the new Tesla (3000% gain in the first 10 years) ?
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-tesla-stock-went-up-since-ipo-timeline-2020-6 Some might argue that Norront fusion is the real-deal - and is well-positioned - perhaps to do even better than Tesla following their IPO a decade ago ...
Re: [Vo]:Muons: 'Strong' evidence found for a new force of nature
PBS Space Time Why the Muon g-2 Results Are So Exciting! https://youtu.be/O4Ko7NW2yQo Harry On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 10:04 AM H LV wrote: > Muons: 'Strong' evidence found for a new force of nature > > https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677 > > quotes: > > There is currently a one in a 40,000 chance that the result could be a > statistical fluke - equating to a statistical level of confidence described > as 4.1 sigma. > A level of 5 sigma, or a one in 3.5 million chance of the observation > being a coincidence, is needed to claim a discovery. > > Prof Ben Allanach, from Cambridge University, who was not involved with > the latest effort, said: "My Spidey sense is tingling and telling me that > this is going to be real. > > The Muon g-2 experiment involves sending the particles around a 14-metre > ring and then applying a magnetic field. Under the current laws of physics, > encoded in the Standard Model, this should make the muons wobble at a > certain rate. > > Instead, the scientists found that muons wobbled at a faster rate than > expected. This might be caused by a force of nature that's completely new > to science. > > Harry > > > >
[Vo]:Muons: 'Strong' evidence found for a new force of nature
Muons: 'Strong' evidence found for a new force of nature https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677 quotes: There is currently a one in a 40,000 chance that the result could be a statistical fluke - equating to a statistical level of confidence described as 4.1 sigma. A level of 5 sigma, or a one in 3.5 million chance of the observation being a coincidence, is needed to claim a discovery. Prof Ben Allanach, from Cambridge University, who was not involved with the latest effort, said: "My Spidey sense is tingling and telling me that this is going to be real. The Muon g-2 experiment involves sending the particles around a 14-metre ring and then applying a magnetic field. Under the current laws of physics, encoded in the Standard Model, this should make the muons wobble at a certain rate. Instead, the scientists found that muons wobbled at a faster rate than expected. This might be caused by a force of nature that's completely new to science. Harry
