Re: [Vo]: uap report out
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 28 Jun 2021 01:12:35 -0400: Hi, >*Fortune favours the bold.* Unfortunately, so does misfortune. ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
Re: [Vo]: uap report out
*Fortune favours the bold.* On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 1:06 AM Robin wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:55:51 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >Why not opt for some active measures. Fire a missile into one of these > >UAPs. What will happen is that the missile will pass right on through this > >UAP and the drama will be all over. > > If it's mundane, you would certainly prove as much, however your missile > is going to land somewhere, and do you really > want to be responsible for killing someone with it? However if it's a real > object, then you could be shooting a plane > out of the sky. If it's an alien space ship, they will blast your missile > out of the sky before it hits. See previously > posted photo taken by google street view in outback Western Australia. ;) > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > >
Re: [Vo]: uap report out
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:55:51 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Why not opt for some active measures. Fire a missile into one of these >UAPs. What will happen is that the missile will pass right on through this >UAP and the drama will be all over. If it's mundane, you would certainly prove as much, however your missile is going to land somewhere, and do you really want to be responsible for killing someone with it? However if it's a real object, then you could be shooting a plane out of the sky. If it's an alien space ship, they will blast your missile out of the sky before it hits. See previously posted photo taken by google street view in outback Western Australia. ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
Re: [Vo]: uap report out
Why not opt for some active measures. Fire a missile into one of these UAPs. What will happen is that the missile will pass right on through this UAP and the drama will be all over. On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:47 AM Robin wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:19:42 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >The "UAP" is likely to be a form of ball lightning. > > That's certainly one possibility. Another mundane explanation for some > nighttime occurrences is remote lights from over > the horizon reflecting off an inversion layer. > > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > >
Re: [Vo]: uap report out
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:19:42 -0400: Hi, [snip] >The "UAP" is likely to be a form of ball lightning. That's certainly one possibility. Another mundane explanation for some nighttime occurrences is remote lights from over the horizon reflecting off an inversion layer. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
Re: [Vo]: uap report out
The "UAP" is likely to be a form of ball lightning. On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 11:37 PM Robin wrote: > In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 28 Jun 2021 01:14:21 + > (UTC): > Hi, > [snip] > >Frank - Don't you love the way the brass likes to exert a bit of > unnecessary control every story by ignoring the common designation (in wide > use by the public - which is UFO) - and inserting their own name? > > > >Why invent "UAP" when UFO is equally unknown and ambiguous, since it > adds zero real info, other than a layer of confusion ? > > Maybe that's why. :) > > Actually "phenomena" is somewhat more encompassing than "object", which > tends to imply a solid thing. "Phenomena" also > allows for cloud formations etc. So they are either trying to be objective > ;) or trying to "explain away" as much as > possible. > [snip] > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > >
Re: [Vo]: uap report out
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 28 Jun 2021 01:14:21 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >Frank - Don't you love the way the brass likes to exert a bit of unnecessary >control every story by ignoring the common designation (in wide use by the >public - which is UFO) - and inserting their own name? > >Why invent "UAP" when UFO is equally unknown and ambiguous, since it adds >zero real info, other than a layer of confusion ? Maybe that's why. :) Actually "phenomena" is somewhat more encompassing than "object", which tends to imply a solid thing. "Phenomena" also allows for cloud formations etc. So they are either trying to be objective ;) or trying to "explain away" as much as possible. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
[Vo]: uap report out
Frank - Don't you love the way the brass likes to exert a bit of unnecessary control every story by ignoring the common designation (in wide use by the public - which is UFO) - and inserting their own name? Why invent "UAP" when UFO is equally unknown and ambiguous, since it adds zero real info, other than a layer of confusion ? The more interesting detail is that there is apparently some slight correlation between a few of the UAP/UFO sightings and Oumuamua It is tempting to think of this strange intruder as akin to the "monolith" in "2001" - you know the one. A Possible Link between ‘Oumuamua and Unidentified Aerial Phenomena | | | | | | | | | | | A Possible Link between ‘Oumuamua and Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Avi Loeb If some UAP turn out to be extraterrestrial technology, they could be dropping sensors for a subsequent craft to... | | |
[Vo]:traffic and driver modified by technology hack
https://interestingengineering.com/man-uses-99-phones-and-a-handcart-to-create-a-virtual-traffic-jam-on-google-maps This reminds me of the traffic wave modifications.
