Re: [Vo]:Bard chatbot released

2023-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robin  wrote:


> When they stuff something up, you might consider asking for the reference
> they used to provide the wrong answer.
>

Yes, that is a good technique. I have used that successfully with ChatGPT.


Re: [Vo]:Bard chatbot released

2023-03-23 Thread Robin
In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:59:18 -0400:
Hi,

An exam is largely a test of knowledge, and chatbots get to cheat by accessing 
reference material. However a real lawyer
also needs to have a deep understanding of human beings and their motivations, 
and also to be creative. I doubt a
chatbot would be so good at that.

Cloud storage:-

Unsafe, Slow, Expensive 

...pick any three.



Re: [Vo]:Bard chatbot released

2023-03-23 Thread Robin
In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:59:18 -0400:
Hi Jed,

When they stuff something up, you might consider asking for the reference they 
used to provide the wrong answer.
That gives humans a chance to fix the original, which will in turn result in 
better future responses.

>H L V  wrote:
>
>
>> However, the second part of the statement is not accurate. Oxygen-18 is a
>>> heavier isotope of oxygen with two more neutrons and two more protons in
>>> its nucleus, not one more neutron and one more proton.
>>>
>>
>> If it had two more protons it would be neon.
>>
>
>You are right. I didn't even read the response carefully. It is funny that
>Bard got it right the second time and ChatGPT messed up.
>
>This shows you need to check these responses carefully. The chatbots are
>far from reliable now. They are improving rapidly.
>
>Despite the problems, the latest version of ChatGPT reportedly passed a bar
>exam that it previously failed. See:
>
>https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/latest-version-of-chatgpt-aces-the-bar-exam-with-score-in-90th-percentile
Cloud storage:-

Unsafe, Slow, Expensive 

...pick any three.



Re: [Vo]:Bard chatbot released

2023-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
H L V  wrote:


> However, the second part of the statement is not accurate. Oxygen-18 is a
>> heavier isotope of oxygen with two more neutrons and two more protons in
>> its nucleus, not one more neutron and one more proton.
>>
>
> If it had two more protons it would be neon.
>

You are right. I didn't even read the response carefully. It is funny that
Bard got it right the second time and ChatGPT messed up.

This shows you need to check these responses carefully. The chatbots are
far from reliable now. They are improving rapidly.

Despite the problems, the latest version of ChatGPT reportedly passed a bar
exam that it previously failed. See:

https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/latest-version-of-chatgpt-aces-the-bar-exam-with-score-in-90th-percentile


[Vo]:Holey Magnetosphere

2023-03-23 Thread Terry Blanton
https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-is-tracking-a-huge-growing-anomaly-in-earths-magnetic-field


Re: [Vo]:Bard chatbot released

2023-03-23 Thread H L V
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 9:26 AM Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> ChatGPT found and corrected the mistake made by Bard.
>
>
> ME: Is the following statement correct, and if not, what is the correct
> version? "Deuterium is a heavier isotope of hydrogen with one more neutron
> in its nucleus, while oxygen-18 is a heavier isotope of oxygen with one
> more neutron and one more proton in its nucleus."
>
> ChatGPT: The first part of the statement is correct. Deuterium is a
> heavier isotope of hydrogen with one more neutron in its nucleus.
>
> However, the second part of the statement is not accurate. Oxygen-18 is a
> heavier isotope of oxygen with two more neutrons and two more protons in
> its nucleus, not one more neutron and one more proton.
>

If it had two more protons it would be neon.

harry


Re: [Vo]:Bard chatbot released

2023-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Bard also got it right when I asked about the statement in isolation. This
shows that the output from these programs is inconsistent.

ME: Is the following statement correct, and if not, what is the correct
version? "Deuterium is a heavier isotope of hydrogen with one more neutron
in its nucleus, while oxygen-18 is a heavier isotope of oxygen with one
more neutron and one more proton in its nucleus."

Bard: The statement is not correct. Deuterium is a heavier isotope of
hydrogen with one more neutron in its nucleus. Oxygen-18 is a heavier
isotope of oxygen with two more neutrons in its nucleus.

Deuterium (D) has one neutron and one proton in its nucleus, while protium
(H) has no neutrons and one proton. Oxygen-18 (O-18) has eight neutrons and
ten protons, while oxygen-16 (O-16) has eight neutrons and eight protons.


Re: [Vo]:Bard chatbot released

2023-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
ChatGPT found and corrected the mistake made by Bard.


ME: Is the following statement correct, and if not, what is the correct
version? "Deuterium is a heavier isotope of hydrogen with one more neutron
in its nucleus, while oxygen-18 is a heavier isotope of oxygen with one
more neutron and one more proton in its nucleus."

ChatGPT: The first part of the statement is correct. Deuterium is a heavier
isotope of hydrogen with one more neutron in its nucleus.

However, the second part of the statement is not accurate. Oxygen-18 is a
heavier isotope of oxygen with two more neutrons and two more protons in
its nucleus, not one more neutron and one more proton.