It's always interesting to question what is considered our standard point
of view even when it works so well. Special Relativity is common sense in
my opinion and is why I would never give it up. However, what always
bugged me was time and using it as a 4th dimension. One of the concepts of
A few updates...
First because the Michelson Morley claim seemed plausible but not totally
conclusive, I wasn't doing the math myself and math isn't my thing so I
farmed that out to AI's that kept on having different ideas so to be sure I
had to really drill down and figure out the best most pure
Jonathan
That video wasn't mine, but it explains quite a lot of the basics.
If going into more detail then things get more complicated. What I have
been looking at is Einstein 1905 paper on special relativity - and the
physicist Sommerfeld changed it into a different theory when translated
Oh, I didn't make the connection of the name until now, I am watching a
presentation you made (only got half an hour in last night), this one:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=an6JiBLQqXY=8s
But I should I guess watch the video you suggest, but I'd happily have a
discussion on here with you and pick your
my videos dealing with Einstein theory being mistranslated:
latest:
ANPA 2023 talk: Einstein's 1905 relativity theory was changed into a
different theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EH2-cnot-6g
older videos:
Preview of Proposed talk 2019: EINSTEIN MISTRANSLATED
One-way and two-way speed of light would be a modern interpretation
being imposed onto what Einstein was saying in 1905.
i.e. translating what Einstein was saying in 1905 from a modern
perspective.
as opposed to translating what Einstein was saying from 1905 perspective
-- Original
What I mean is that there might be translation issues, but I doubt it was a
translation issue relating to Einstein not mentioning the one way speed of
light, i would imagine if he went to the point of saying "one way speed of
light" in german that would have been odd to drop the "one way" part.
I am now doing AntiRelativity discussions
Number 2 - was some people translate/interpret Sagnac experiment as
disproves relativity (while others don't)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnN_NX3m_Tw
Number 3 will be on Relativistic mass
Relativity is just being subjected to numerous
but it is
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 06:34
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I doubt it's a translation issue.
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 22:24, ROGER ANDERTON
9 matches
Mail list logo
