On 2021-12-01 01:57, Robin wrote:
In an electrolytic cell both H and K will form at the cathode, though the K
will only be short lived because it combines
with water to form KOH & H.
However if a K atom and an H atom form in close proximity to one another at the
same time, then the possibility
tating magnetic field may produce what is
commonly- called electric charge. So(4) physics may be applicable to
quantification. ( Jurg may have better ideas about this.)
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows
*From: *Bill Antoni <mailto:banton
On 2021-11-23 15:39, Jones Beene wrote:
It is hard to separate Mills' theory from Holmlid's work. They are
likely to be complementary with both offering important details. One
early experiment for a "critical volume" validation could involve the
catalytic propensity of reactor itself. IOW - a
On 2021-11-23 17:44, Jones Beene wrote:
Thanks for remembering this experiment from Simon Brink !
The effect is surprisingly large and my bet is that it only works well
with 316 grade SS.
If so - that would be good evidence for Mills' theory and the
importance of the lowest energy catalyst.
Jones Beene wrote:
One further thought about the Thermacore runaway - is there a potential lesson
there, for experiment design ?
There could be one lesson which can be called - GO BIG... but also BEWARE if
you go big.
Perhaps there is something akin to critical mass, which is important for
quot;apparently" canceled, despite the energy anomaly.
Probably worth a deeper look...
Bill Antoni wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
One further thought about the Thermacore runaway - is there a potential lesson
there, for experiment design ?
There could be one lesson which can be called - GO BIG... bu
On 2021-12-02 19:35, Jones Beene wrote:
This doesn't give us much of a clue about what could be the cause of
excess hydrogen... unless Holmlid's muons are carrying away heat
somehow while splitting off protons in the process.
The authors suggested that thermolysis was occurring, i.e. that
On 2021-12-02 22:00, Jones Beene wrote:
Do you by any chance have a radiation monitor capable of seeing a
signal from your cell when unpowered ?
It would be significant if there was an increase in counts which
tracked the onset of a visible plasma (assuming the plasma itself is
below the
On 2021-12-01 19:33, Jones Beene wrote:
[...]
"IF" (big if) *unusually high hydrogen output* from an RF electrolysis
cell can be demonstrated, then good evidence of what is happening to
account for the gain - whether it is Millsean/Holmlid or instead is
related to nuclear beta decay, can be
On 2021-12-03 01:18, Robin wrote:
If a measurable amount of energy is produced by the cell, and is of nuclear
origin, then even an insensitive detector
should pick up multiple counts / second.
To test your detector, you can use an Americium based smoke detector. That's
only about 1 micro
On 2021-12-03 02:51, Robin wrote:
If you put your detector in a well grounded Faraday cage, it may eliminate most
radio interference produced by sparking.
Use metal (not nylon) fly wire for the Faraday cage (or at least for a window
if you prefer the whole cage be made of
metal sheet). The
11 matches
Mail list logo
