On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
In addition, the behavior of helium and tritium show that they are made
very near the surface and not in the bulk. These issues have been well
discussed.
To elaborate, the conclusion that Pd/D LENR is a surface effect
I wrote:
2. There have been several high-profile Pd/D experiments that have proposed
a correlation of 4He off-gas production on the order of the heat observed
-- somewhere near 24 MeV per palladium atom, although the precise value is
in dispute.
Correction -- the value (which is disputed)
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Now, as you note, drones may give everyone a tool to gum up the works.
Once the hummingbird drones become armed and readily available, at least on
the black market, as I assume will happen before too long, they will be a
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:59 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
If the energy is released in the form of a fast particle, then it does not
have
to depend on diffusion. A fast particle will rip through a lattice at high
speed, leaving a trail of ionized atoms in it's wake.
That provides a nice
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:58 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The cone shape does strongly suggest that a particle type of ignition is
occurring which propagates along the main momentum direction. I find it
interesting that there also appears to be a coordination among the
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:50 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
A fast particle doesn't need a matching energy band to lose energy. It
loses a
portion of what it has simply by ionizing other atoms.
I gather that Ron is envisioning some kind of fermi liquid of deuterons,
with a band gap that is
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
...one can only hope! However the truth is that most of the energy we use is
returned to the environment as heat, so taking it out as wind power and
putting
it back as heat would probably have very little net effect.
Regards,
Also,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:50 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However having lost almost all of their energy, how do they penetrate far
enough
into a Pd atom to undergo fusion reaction?
Good question.
In a different connection, an important point that he makes concerns the
ROI -- he says that
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Alexander Hollins
alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
then it can be estimated to have happened 454 THOUSAND times in Earth's
history.
This raises an interesting philosophical problem. The simultaneous events
were perhaps coincidence in a human timeframe
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
How tightly are they actually connected when in a metal crystal? I can see
how it might be possible to obtain a very large Q if the nucleus is weakly
restrained by the electrons. The spring analogy is a good one and it
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Quark mass does not have a value which can be agreed on, so how can
protons?
If I were a betting man, I would bet that the mass of a proton can change,
as well as that of a neutron. The reasoning goes like this. An
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In a different connection, an important point that he makes concerns the
ROI -- he says that a 20 keV deuteron will travel a long distance, perhaps
on the order of millimeters, through a metal. Assuming he's right, that's
a lot more
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
The solution is to stop taking money from people against their will,
using threats of violence. The idea that we can improve society if only
we can threaten enough people, and take enough money from them, is
preposterous.
A further reply from Ron, below.
Eric
The stopping distance is around 600 atoms according to Spaandonk, and I
don't dispute the theoretical value, but I don't know if this is accurate,
it can be larger or smaller, because the calculations are theoretical, and
this energy regime is comparable to
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Why not do a technical defense, instead of a personal attack on Bob’s
critics?
** **
It is clear you have a slant that goes far beyond science, logic or common
sense. Are you a licensee of Inteligentry? Do you have
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
What would be more interesting than a poor
video (but we can only guess what is reported) is the actual Navy report of
this test. Maybe someone should put in a FOI request for it.
That would be great. It could
An additional reply from Ron, below.
Eric
Fusion doesn't have a rate as a function of distance, it's a coherent
tunneling effect in deuterons and it depends on the whole wavefunction
shape not on the classical 'distance between nucleons'.
You can only calculate it using a two-body - resonance
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:59 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
There is also the possibility that the mass of the particle actually
derives
form it's interaction with the ZPE, and that when protons and neutrons are
packed closely together, they shield one another to some extent, so that
the
On Mar 10, 2013, at 13:30, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
The idea is that the ZPE is the provider of *all* mass to all things.
Is this an elaboration of or a replacement for the Higgs field?
Eric
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
With the smart meter, I get a price break now, for not using power during
peak summer hours.
My power consumption is always well below the energy efficient household
average in the occasional power consumption reports
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
That is what you seem to be missing in all of this. It is not hot fusion
but CoE does apply. In the O-P reaction, the Coulomb barrier is overcome
when two deuterons approach each other with the neutron end of each facing
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:04 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
The sentence:-
The loss of intermolecular bond energy in the conversion from liquid to
fog
must be the source of the explosion energy.
... is the problem. First, they have the sign of intermolecular bond energy
wrong. When water
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
One interesting point is the maximum gain curve for enhancement is about
850-900 nm geometry – if the authors chose this dimension specifically for
its gain - which is almost exactly 10 times the diameter of the gold
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:03 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I assume that the only reason that they do not join together is because of
some form of quantum mechanical process. It is interesting that the
electron seeks close companionship with the proton, but not too close.
I
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
There is no conventional scenario in nuclear physics to explain this... and
it is so unexpected as to be outlandish. It should be noted that all of
these are common elements - which argues against an exotic process, and in
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:59 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Note that the equations I posted did *not* involve deuterium, but rather a
Hydrino molecule.
Sorry for the lack of clarity, there. I wasn't thinking of the equations
you just posted, but back to the thread that took place several
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:50 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
BTW there is no potential barrier here. The proton and the electron carry
opposite charges, so they are attracted to one another, rather than
repelled.
I take it that when physicists refer to a potential barrier, they mean
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:45 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Eric, I have been seeking a chain reaction of some sort that is initiated
by a high energy particle.
I hope I'm not a downer for saying so, but I get the impression that the
craters are from an undirected source of heat
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
There is no doubt about big bang cosmology.
An assumption that I think would be good to further examine is that the
speed of light has remained constant. If it varied over time, conclusions
about rate of expansion of
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The specification of the ultra-low energy neutron was engineered to make it
virtually undetectable because it doesn’t move far from the nucleus before
its immense nuclear absorption cross section results in its almost
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
W-L electron capture may, or may not, occur, but AFAIK no one proposed
that neutrons would be generated ultracold.
I thought that ultracold and ultra low momentum were basically
synonymous -- please correct me if I'm wrong. If
Lou,
If LENR neutrons are indeed generated as proposed by W-L, almost all will
be in the thermal range - quite a low momentum by fusion standards.
They speak about ultra low momentum neutrons, which I think is
significantly lower than thermal energies. These would then collide with
nickel
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:42 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
I am perplexed, though, that some, whose own beliefs are derided by main
stream science, are so eager to persecute. Maybe they are smarter than
the rest. Maybe not.
Agreed. I don't think Widom and Larsen or their theory should
Thank you, Robin.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
So I
think you would take the weighted average of these to get an upper bound
on
the absorption cross section of a block of normal nickel; e.g., 100 * .68
+
50 * .26 = 81 barns.
My earlier calculation was flawed.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:27 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Now let the
entire ellipse swing around the focus like a hoola hoop. We have a second
form
of angular momentum (l). Note that the electron itself is still following
the
original trajectory around the perimeter of the ellipse as
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
What's to make this kind of precession not be a spherical one, e.g., such
that the movement of the ellipsoid over time rather than being planar
instead cancels out any magnetic moment?
To attempt an answer to my own
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Then you should be able to follow the same procedure, but include all the
natural isotopes, no?
I've gone back and corrected the calculation to take into account the
missing isotopes. This time I obtained upper and lower bounds for
converting to copper.
Also, in most experiments, the liquid of the Ni-nanoparticle emulsion may
have a significant impact.
Cheers,
Lou Pagnucco
Eric Walker wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Then you should be able to follow the same procedure, but include all
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
Right now I am struggling to learn how to use “lost wax” casting of Pd
+23%Ag alloys for making a toroid.
See [1], where they're using geometry involving a silver core and a thin
palladium shell to split water into
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:45 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
A very crude model that I constructed implied that the region of maximum
heating due to the passing particle would continue along the original
momentum direction.
Dave,
David Nagel has put together a paper on the topic
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The reaction should be called cold fission.
Yes, it is tempting to think there is fission going on (or perhaps
cluster decay).
He4 being a gas will escape the nuclear active zone before a fusion
process can build on it so
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
...however, that having been said, the path that the bouncing neutrons
follow
would be longer because of a random-walk. Since the path is longer, their
chances of being captured increases...but maybe this is already included
in the
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:39 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I was thinking that the neutrons would move relatively freely through
matter since they lack a charge to interact and the physical sizes of the
nuclei as well as the neutron are so small compared to the electron
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:15 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I was considering the behavior of ultra low momentum neutrons within a
metallic structure and a question arose. Why would the local temperature
of the nickel atoms not completely dominate the activity of the low
I wrote:
Take a (hypothetical) near-stationary neutron and an energetic nickel
lattice atom. I believe their interaction is characterized by the
center-of-mass system that takes them both into account -- if the nickel
atom is moving quickly towards the neutron, according to the
On Mar 30, 2013, at 7:49, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Actually... Rossi came to mind too! I KNOW he’s crazy. Crazy enuf to have
actually created an authentic e-Cat! ;-)
Actually, I wonder if Rossi is the sanest one around, and his behavior
attributable
I suspect this is a roundabout complaint on YouTube's part about Google's
shutting down Google Reader (an unfortunate decision in my opinion).
Eric
On Apr 1, 2013, at 7:59, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
They have enough videos. See:
Obviously. That was assumed.
But it also occurs to me that they're more likely to be alluding to the US
budget impasse than Google Reader.
Eric
On Apr 1, 2013, at 12:06, Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
or it has something to do with the fact that today is the first of
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The only way I can understand an operation of this type is to assume that
the nuclei are connected electro magnetically to a strong degree. Maybe
entangled would work, but the coupling would need to be strong. And if
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a false assumption. Nanoplasmoics show strong coupling between
light and electrons at 10 to the minus 8 power of the wavelength of light.
Yes -- to clarify my earlier point, photons of large wavelength can also
Ha! Yes, it seems you linked to the article about the quarks far earlier
than I did. My apologies for not reading your original post more closely.
I think I saw it during lunch on my iPhone and didn't have time to give it
the attention it deserved.
Yes, chiming in from knowledgeable people
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:54 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
To put it in simple terms, the presence of the spectator nucleus provides
the
4He, something to push off against, like a swimmer pushing off against
the end
of the pool. The spectator nucleus also gets some of the kinetic energy,
IOW
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
You can’t be serious.
Yes, I think that's the point. I had a friend in high school who would say
the most absurd things just to get a reaction out of people.
Eric
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
One implication appears to be that you would see 4He traveling twice as
fast in a given direction near where a reaction has taken place than you
would in normal d+d plasma fusion.
Let me emend that -- in d+d plasma
This article does not shy away from making big claims about Defkalion's
technology in development.
In a different connection, there was this from Sterling Allan, which
pertains to the discussion about gammas:
Even though transmutation is a nuclear process, it is not a dangerous one.
One US
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Where did you get the idea that soft x-rays were not harmful? In fact they
are deadly, but not instantly deadly, if that makes them slightly less
problematic.
The thought did occur to me after I pressed send that given a
Further to the thread about gammas, here are these money quotes from the
PDF by Lichtenberg concerning the reaction in Rossi's devices:
About the LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions) within the ECAT systems:
- the details of the LENR processes are still not yet known
- the formerly
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:54 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I wouldn't accept such a nomination. This theory has been around for years
(decades?), and I have played no part in it.
I was not really calling out a Nobel Prize more than you might call a play
during a game, just in fun.
Are you
Somehow that went straight to Analog -- copying the list.
Eric
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Yildiz motor in Geneva -- ran 5.5 hours then broke down
To: Analog Fan analogit...@yahoo.com
Hi
Further to the matter of hummingbird drones:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tetyswGyGA
This one has a range of 0.5 miles and can stay in flight for 30 minutes
(?). The video mentions the contract for them being in the range of 150 or
so, which starts making them sound like they're priced
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:43 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
What is the currently accepted size of a photon that behaves as a particle?
If one of these passes through our very large slit experiment how would it
be detected at one location as with light photons? Could it be
I wrote:
to an observer much smaller and more quickly moving than the gamma ray
photon, the gamma photon will behave in the manner of the radio wave photon
in our frame of reference.
By more quickly moving, I'm thinking not of velocity, but of time slices
-- the small little thing gets a lot
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:08 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The important questions that we need answered are how much actual energy is
stored in the original magnet and how much can we borrow? Who wants to
tackle these questions?
I'll give it an attempt. The energy stored in
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:24 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
That means he has a whopping 512kJ to run down during his 5 hours. This
calculates out to:
512kJ;5hour?W
(512 * [kilo*joule]) * (5 * hour)^-1 ? watt
= 28.44 W
That's just about enough to run a little fan.
It seems to me that the idea of an ether is a useful one, albeit not in the
form people were anticipating early last century. I believe they expected
to find experimental evidence of a general movement in a specific direction
if an ether existed. I see no reason to think that an either needs to
Not being able to project force invites miscalculation (e.g., of countries
like North Korea). Costa Rica's happiness and peace are possible in part
due to its being under the shelter of other powers.
Eric
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
I think
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Alexander Hollins
alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
I do feel a minor vibration in my right palm when holding both hands to teh
monitor. I KINDA feel what i could describe as a sucking feeling on my
left, it is too minor to differentiate from placebo to me,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:03 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
You could argue that nothing really proves anything.
Even atoms are still just considered a theory, sure a popular one with
tons of evidence.
Yes, good point. When it comes down to it, nobody has seen an atom. It's
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:29 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
But it might be scientific, if scientific does not mean logical and
truthful.
But when I say scientific, I mean logical and truthful.
What science is is something that smart people have spent their entire
careers
I think the more suitable analogy is to Heart of Darkness. We are Marlow,
and Rossi is Kurtz.
Eric
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel a bit like Adm. Nagumo in the middle of the Battle of Midway. He was
deluged with intelligence sightings of the
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 6:15 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Many of the great discoveries were there in plain view for years until
someone got lucky. My favorite example is the laser which could have been
discovered over 100 years ago (gas type instead of ruby rod) had physics
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
As usual, Axil is off by orders of magnitude. His 10^20 neutron decay
garbage is nothing but complete BS.
People here do not understand Axil. He is the cat, and we are the mouse.
Eric
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
IMO Rossi only concentrates on 62Ni because there is more of it in natural
Ni
that 64Ni, and because fusion with a proton results in 63Cu which is
stable.
Since it produces a stable isotope he can then claim that his reactor
doesn't
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
58Ni + n = 59Ni + 9 MeV.
This results in a 59Ni nucleus in an excited state, and it soon loses the
9 MeV
of energy in the form of gamma radiation as it decays to the ground state.
I think you're addressing a specific point. It's
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:19 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
5) Consequently, it is highly unlikely that neutron capture is the energy
generating mechanism (if indeed there is one) in Rossi's device.
Can a similar argument be made for proton capture? I got the impression
somewhere that proton
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:28 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Everyone needs to ban them and in a manner that can be verified. I expect
a lot of cheating with such a powerful device.
I feel like this is one of those quiet developments that will sneak up on
us and have profound
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
A few experiments conducted before this showed
ambiguous evidence: two protons emerged from the decay but one
couldn’t tell that the protons had not been thrown out one at a time
or both at the same time randomly from
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Protons and neutrons are bound by the strong nuclear force, which is
mediated by gluons and described by the theory of quantum chromodynamics
(QCD). Unlike photons, which mediate the electromagnetic force, gluons can
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Not to mention Hot Fusion's dirty little secret -- all those neutrons make
the entire structure radioactive which the wiki article describes as a
very short halflife of FIFTY YEARS !!!
I noticed that. The
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
The answer a person makes to this question determines the rest of the
discussion. Consequently, this conflict in basic belief must be resolved
before any discussion is possible. I get the impression that a great deal
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 6:15 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However for f/H, the story is different. Particularly at deep levels, where
a
significant proportion of the mass has been converted to energy.
One question I have about the tight-binding hydrogen models -- what can be
expected with
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
What I'm suggesting is that in an electric field like the background of
charge of the electrons in a metal will reduce the orbital radii of an H in
that metal. That effect is seen in Rydberg atoms in an electric field. I
I'm also a big fan of proton capture, since it results in a cleaner
reaction, and from what I gather the transmutations that are observed in
LENR experiments are generally to stable nuclei, which, I'm given to
understand, is consistent with proton capture in a way that it is not with
neutron
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ron Wormus prot...@frii.com wrote:
Pretty Cool.
http://io9.com/this-is-**officially-the-worlds-tiniest-**
stop-motion-film-486198380?**autoplay=1http://io9.com/this-is-officially-the-worlds-tiniest-stop-motion-film-486198380?autoplay=1
That's entertaining.
I have added this video to the list of quirky free energy videos that I'm
starting.
From the last segment of the video: The complete theory can be found in a
single book. ... Particle Mechanics: The Theory of Energy States
http://particlemechanics.com/
Energy is conserved, since you will need to pay it back in the form of work
when you decide to pull the spheres apart afterwards.
Eric
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:07 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
This demonstration follows an earlier discussion where we determined that
magnetic
Hi Ed,
In fact, I suggested an explanation that met all of these requirements, but
this was either rejected or ignored. Consequently, I have very little hope
for any theory being accepted any time soon.
I have read your recent JCMNS articles. My difficulty with your
explanation is almost
I wrote:
it is unlikely that you can have a hydroton in which, after successive
vibrations of the chain, the hydrogen nuclei gradually combine with the
electrons sandwiched between them and give off small bursts of low-energy
EMF. This seems to fly in the face of Coulomb repulsion and the
Something fun to fret about: the robot itself is a tiny little thing,
barely larger than a US cent.
http://images.sciencedaily.com/2013/05/130502142649.jpg
From the article:
the next steps will involve integrating the parallel work of many
different research teams who are working on the
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I now propose it is a chain formed from 2p bonds that allow a series of
hydrons to form a chain of atoms. This kind of bond is normally not stable.
I propose it becomes stable in the crack for reasons I will not describe
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:47 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
My guess is that these are the hardest to remove from circulating air.
- probably it's better to keep them in a confined chamber when preparing a
colloid. I am not sure whether they penetrate skin.
I suspect that another problem
I wrote:
It's clear that you're looking for a way to conserve momentum, so that you
don't get 4He fragments and gamma rays -- i.e., hot fusion.
I didn't mean to imply that tritium and 3He and gammas are the result of
reactions in which momentum is not conserved -- only that you're looking
for
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Eric, before you make a conclusion you really need to understand what I'm
proposing, rather than using your own imagination. First of all, the
Hydroton is a neutral molecule consisting of an equal number of elections
It does look like a spoof. You can imagine Spock saying this:
Align the magnetic fields of one spheromak [positively charged Schatten
norm] with one field reversed configuration [negatively charged Frobenius
norm]. With magnetic equilibrium they could synaptically generate a
reversed field
Hi,
First let me say I really like your enthusiasm for debunking. It is rare
to see that much energy.
Not totally wrong, just wrongly interpreted.
Then you should help the laymen and failed scientists here interpret the
misinterpreted evidentiary record -- specifically, you should focus
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
But there are other ways to conserve momentum. I think Robin has drawn
attention to the possibility of f/H combining with another nucleus and
expelling the electron instead of a gamma or a fragment, and Ron Maimon
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
What makes you think that? They are certainly not seen as overzealous now,
except by true believers. If it plays out in such a way that there are no
true believers left, there is no reason to think *anyone* will regard
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Whereas Hagelstein’s model, when all is said and done, is an invention
created to match an experimental outcome (which it does) but with no
precedent in physical reality.
I think such models are called phenomenological
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
The very small number of alpha and neutrons can be explained without
assuming CF is the cause.
I guess this is the conclusion I'm trying to better understand -- I
understand the part about neutrons. It is the very
of nanoplasmonics. This new science has developed the tools to look
into the behavior of the nano-lattice and understand what is going on
inside it.
All that those interested in LENR is to take the time to learn.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun
501 - 600 of 2365 matches
Mail list logo
