RE: [Vo]:When the experts weigh in on real High Technology - BEWARE

For every delusional inventor there are an unlimited and unfettered number of delusional self-serving pundits who demand that their mere thoughts having no pedigree other than their anonymous keyboard pecking are more than equal to any inventors efforts. The crisis of social media is that it

RE: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion TimesImprovement In Yield

In this new paper the Weyl-Kondo deuterate palladium ecosystem is seen to provide more than sufficient conditions for COLD FUSION to occur. http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2017/12/21/weyl-kondo-quantum-semimetal-defines-deuterated-palladium/ From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]

RE: [Vo]:Meshugganons

com> Sent: Saturday, May 5, 2018 1:07 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Meshugganons Russ George suggested that Geiger tubes do not record betas. I would guess that high energy betas (depending upon the window composition) should be recorded by Geiger tubes. Russ's beta s

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

Sorry Bob but you are wrong, see the gammas on demand in cold fusion. https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5597-atom-ecology/ From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 6:04 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from

RE: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems

only wanting to add to their inner vulture are not. Adventure vs. Advulture, ever it has been so. Fusing as always Russ George Atom-ecology.russgeorge.net From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 9:05 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>

RE: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems

for engaging in exchanges of ideas. One of my business partners Admiral Bud Zumwalt used to admonish me saying "Russ, just show them a little thigh, you know they will want to see a whole lot more. Make them do something for the rest of show." Fusing as always Russ Ge

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems

-frame when Rossi saw gamma, he was running an unfueled system,so was Piantelli and Celani. Russ George is now experimenting with an unfueled system. The development of LENR fuel came latter as an innovation by Rossi. I speculate that Rossi found that when he reused ash from his reactors, they were

RE: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems

be shoehorned into aging dogma or refuted, it is a facet of a vast complex and all but invisible atom ecology. From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:38 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems

t; =249s On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: The notion of a ‘flash of gammas’ being what is there is just wrong. There is a steady state production of gammas in these sorts of cold fusion ecologies. Rossi k

RE: [Vo]:Meshugganons

Since the mischugenon was so named by Edward Teller in conversation with me on the basis of his work with me and my unique data set showing them. I have renamed the ‘mischugenon’ as the ‘Telleron’ in respect to the great man who befriended and helped me so much in this work. So the name for

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Visual evidence of dense hydrogen

To suggest that Mills has not looked at this ‘magnetic smoke’ sufficiently to eliminate it being made of magnetic metal is to suggest that Mills is either a fool or a fraud. Given that such wild speculation by armchair pundits is surely more of an exercise in ego and not an earnest effort to

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Visual evidence of dense hydrogen

The TOF SIMs equipment Mills has in his lab is known to be more than sufficient to identify composition and isotope ratios in his materials. He clearly bought that equipment precisely to study such possible transmutation possibilities. I give him the benefit of the doubt that he is not blowing

RE: [Vo]:Fwd: Glow tube experiment

Sorry that dog won’t hunt, the present experiment is nothing like this. Keep fishing. From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 6:13 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: [Vo]:Fwd: Glow tube experiment The Alan/Russ experiment has been conduc

RE: [Vo]:Fwd: Glow tube experiment

of technologies using this clean limitless energy to save the world from the fossil fool age in about a year. Alas one full time old guy and a couple of part-time old guy assistants changes the rate. Russ From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 7:45 PM To: vortex-l <

RE: [Vo]:The PP fusion reaction in LENR

. -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com <mix...@bigpond.com> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 10:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:The PP fusion reaction in LENR In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 21 May 2018 11:00:54 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Russ <russ.geo...@gmai

RE: [Vo]:The PP fusion reaction in LENR

Might you point to a reference where the mass of neutrons in deuterium vs. other nuclides is said to be different. -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2018 10:56 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:The PP fusion reaction in LENR

RE: [Vo]:Fast company in Fresno

Conduction band moving particles that are not electrons were very clearly described in the work of Talbot and Scott Chubb. They focused their considerable genius on proton conduction which includes deuteron conduction. RIP Scott and Talbot, they were good companions in the study of cold fusion

RE: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion TimesImprovement In Yield

avy Fermion System I did not see where " deuterate palladium ecosystem" is found to be a Weyl-Kondo semimetal. The materials used in the experiments for Weyl-Kondo semimetal were CeRu4Sn6 and Ce3Bi4Pd3. On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:r

RE: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries

In the world aptly described where, science progresses funeral by funeral, this was an observation about the naysayers, not the innovators. The rare innovator and their innovations are lost funeral by funeral and there is no tally of the numbers and importance of the losses inflicted upon this

[Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter and explains the EM drive

Here's Mike McCulloch's TedX talk last Thursday. It is remarkable work. https://youtu.be/ZsGZsgd-944 Mike is what one might call as 'armchair physics anti-matter' as he annihilates the fiction of dark matter with straight forward math and real data, eliminating the dark matter fudge that has

RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter andexplains the EM drive

have a finite impulse response that he hadn't addressed when I asked him about it. Russ < <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: Here’s Mike McCulloch’s TedX talk last Thursday. It is remarkable work. <https://youtu.be/ZsGZsgd-944> https://youtu.

RE: [Vo]:LION experiments

What’s to discuss other than perhaps something about the diagnostic incite offered by fervent practice of conflation. From: Alberto De Souza [mailto:alberto.investi...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2018 2:57 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:LION experiments This forum

RE: [Vo]:LION experiments

ubject: Re: [Vo]:LION experiments I wonder if "the fervent practice of conflation" means that the fusion meme that has been the mainstay of LENR theory for so long should now be retooled to somehow fit into an as of yet unfathomable understanding of the LION reactor meltdown. Rus

RE: [Vo]:LION experiments

as of yet unfathomable understanding of the LION reactor meltdown. Russ is among those who are clearly confused by the LION reactor meltdown. Here is his analysis as follows: Melting Miasma - The intact Kanthal wire is a witness to the temperature not reaching the melting point of kanthal which is

[Vo]:Metamaterials ???

I’d love to read a list of candidates for ‘metamaterials’ that might have practical utility as in easy to make and deposit. Any suggestions posted here would be a start on such a list. Thanks From: JonesBeene Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 7:06 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

RE: [Vo]:Metamaterials ???

Here’s a link to an image of one very special use of the right metamaterial https://twitter.com/memcculloch/status/972582613809618944 From: Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 9:15 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Metamaterials ??? I’d love t

RE: [Vo]:Meshugganons

ss you have tried it in different orientations? On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: We have three identical Geiger’s that I switch positions to constantly challenge (and eliminate) any anomalous behaviour and to reveal

RE: [Vo]:Meshugganons

spikes to the plates without them being exposed to the spark gap directly, see if that triggers the Geiger? On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: Nonsense there is no such lead shielding on the experiment as sugges

RE: [Vo]:Meshugganons

Nonsense there is no such lead shielding on the experiment as suggested. As well I have been interchanging 3 independent Geiger counters to eliminate any one being seen as being influenced by stray electrical fields. Only the Geiger that is nearest to the experimental source shows the

RE: [Vo]:LENR fission

At least Jed make the lines of credibility clear, either Rossi is a fraud or Jed is. The jury is still out. If the E-Cat roars then I propose that Jed do the honourable Japanese thing and commit internet seppuku and STFU. From: Jed Rothwell Sent: Saturday, March 17,

RE: [Vo]:Cold fusion research reported at Oak Ridge

Nothing is better than field notes from observers of nature and its ecologies. The jewel in this report is a big part of the solution to cold fusion. It answers the question of how is the apparent energy of cold fusion disseminated broadly instead of being locally destructive. That this layer of

RE: [Vo]:COP < 1 should not be negative evidence for cold fusion (thinking in general, not about Rossi)

e a very very tiny CF reactor, similar to what you used, would be a way to detect this type of radiation in abundance. 2016-05-27 20:09 GMT-03:00 Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> >: . My sonofusion reaction was and is easily scalable to generate h

RE: [Vo]:COP < 1 should not be negative evidence for cold fusion (thinking in general, not about Rossi)

Decades ago I was invited to give a seminar on my evidence of making heat and helium via sonofusion at the General Atomics Tokamak project in San Diego. The tokamak had run a few days before my arrival and it had been a very good test, everyone was happy with the results. My ‘fee’ for giving my

RE: [Vo]:Neuglu - the newly discovered boson

Given that CERN and SLAC claim a 5 sigma signal is "PROOF" in their work the 10 sigma signal seen of this fifth force boson ought to count for something. The 17mev is remarkably within the energy ball park for many here-to-fore 23mev cold fusion events. A really interesting bit is whether this new

RE: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

That’s a cool concept From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 7:15 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons I previously observed the coincidental similarity between the difference in photonic thrust and

RE: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

The momentum of Higgin’s electron/positron pair would be large by comparison! From: Frank Znidarsic [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 9:13 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons The momentum of an emitted photon is very

[Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

OK Dr. Photon just how do we like this news on the EM Drive and the paired out of phase photons? http://www.physics-astronomy.com/2016/06/new-paper-claims-that-em-drive-doesnt.html#.V2LfsvkrKVM

RE: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

Clearly all of the ‘inside the box’ ideas cannot possibly explain the EM Drive thrust, that’s the interesting bit, oh no ‘bits’ are inside the dang box as well… now what? From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 7:28 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

RE: [Vo]:Powerful Shot Against Believers In "No Safe Dose" Of Radiation

Or in more direct wording the benefit of the mentioned radiation was a greater than 30 fold reduction in cancer when compared to those people who were not "accidentally' exposed to long term Co60 radiation. Children born to parents exposed to the radiation showed 14 times fewer congenital

RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

to speed using Holmlid's technique in her own LAB and begin to understand why there are no unstable isotopes produced in the LENR fusion reactions that she is producing there. On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrot

RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

at 3:08 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: For many years some few of us, in the lab not in our armchairs, have been doing just this. Proposing new names for others work and discoveries doesn’t further the progress of science. Fro

RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

Time out ;) or is it time in… the game is afoot! http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/02/06/the-force-of-time/ From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:06 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space== LENR produces

RE: [Vo]:BLP demo video

Dear Russ, Mills wll never give isotopic data because that info would undercut the hydrino theory in preference for the LENR theory. Hydrinos have no nuclear impact whereas LENR does. On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gma

RE: [Vo]: BLP demo video

As a high school freshman I won a blue ribbon at a science fair for my electrostatic generator wherein I dropped water drop by drop past my two electrical contacts which in turn made a tiny neon tube light up in a flash. Perhaps Randy has been dropping drops of water with colloidal silver.

RE: [Vo]:BLP demo video

I would argue that the present context Mills work better supports a philosophical as opposed to scientific discussion. It’s much the same as Rossi’s work. The data is lacking so what is there to talk about other than appearances. For me Mill’s engine core is such a perfect facsimile to

RE: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?

idekickopen35.com/e1t/o/5/f18dQhb0S7ks8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9gXrN7sKj6v4LR3dW8qSMPY7dKPKPW7fRYjz2zlZNzW5CvrmQ1k1H6H0?si=6537132302139392=72763a4e-c9e7-434e-d37c-0ae30919601a> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> >

[Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?

It seems the announcement of showing gravity waves are real is only of value to obscure academic discussions. Unless someone here might illuminate us about some practical derivatives that might be revealed due to the findings.

RE: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?

I vote for option #2 being the source of this signal, the ‘neutral’ particles being crazy neutrons, ‘mischugenons’ as described Edward Teller in earlier closely related cold fusion work. Some few of us have been able to produce these critters. It’s good news if this particular recipe works and

RE: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?

Was there some sort of calibration with some known radiation sources performed with the same NaI instrument in the lab setting. Say placing a Coleman lantern mantle, thorium laced, for a reading, or a banana or cupful of Salt Substitute KCl…. Plenty of known ‘reference radiation sources’ are

RE: [Vo]:Bose condensation in LENR

Of course this BEC condition as the means to allow for ‘cold fusion’ and suppress gammas is precisely what Julian Schwinger proposed in 1989… From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:54 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bose condensation in LENR I

RE: [Vo]:Implied personal radiation dose ?

Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com <mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > wrote: >From the signal pulse, I estimate about 5 micro-Sieverts (uS) per steradian. >So, it depends on how close you were. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mail

[Vo]:Implied personal radiation dose ?

If the radiation signal in the recent MFMP experiment holds up what does this infer as a dose for the person doing the experiment? Clearly that person is both a much larger ‘detector’, likely often closer to the source, and has a long exposure from this and many similar experiments. It would

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

The number of nuclear events/radiations in the recent MFMP test is very very tiny, perhaps representing 1 million events in total , ??. Considering DD fusion as an example to make a single watt/joule of output requires e12 events it is no wonder that this signal is hard to observe. The

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

The photo of the detector placement has helped to understand this mystery As far as 'breaking radiation' aka Bremstrahlung, any form of energetic particle coming to a halt produces that characteristic signal, whether they are crazy heavy muons or speeding electrons...or ??? Neutron clusters or

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

A much better test might be to add a more efficient 'crazy muon' receptor occluding perhaps half of the detector. Say a foil of silver or gadolinium. With such material the count rate might go up. How many cm away was the NaI from the source? Of course this presumes the signal can be

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

Many years ago in the early days of cold fusion I was running an experiment at Los Alamos. We had a high quality Germanium gamma detector and a neutron detector. The neutron detector was old but good though it printed it's data counts onto a paper tape. It had been calibrated in another lab

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

Bob, our solution to the cosmic spallation creating neutrons from lead was to move the lead far away… no lead no neutrons… I shared that story only to tell how easy it is to fuss about small signals… sometimes the signals are ‘relatively’ large for the instrument but meaninglessly tiny for you

RE: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?

't think trying to measure the radon daughters is worthwhile. They would have to be checked with a beta detector anyway, not with the NaI because there is little or no gamma from radon decay as I understand it. Bob On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com

RE: [Vo]:Re: Bremsstrahlung radiation

Here’s a question of those whose imaginations include exotic particles.. what might be the characteristics of polyneutrons? Would they have the same half-life as a single neutron or ??? Clearly they have been observed in Fisher/Orianni work and produced large showers of radiation. They also

RE: [Vo]:New paper from Jiang in Chinese

If x-ray "warming" is taking place then we are at the very simple 'dead graduate student' test phase.. a dose of radiation capable of warming anything is surely lethal so just look into the lab and count the number of dead grad students lying on the floor, any number greater than 0 means a

RE: [Vo]:Implied personal radiation dose ?

, February 26, 2016 2:53 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Implied personal radiation dose ? Hi Russ: I happen to know one of the possibly irradiated parties of this experiment, very well ... He’s a total idiot, actually ... I’m not talking about Alan, here. He’s such an idiot

RE: [Vo]:Implied personal radiation dose ?

of alpha particles as a by-product. John Fisher has seen such particles ascending in the steam produced by an open cell. That particle produced thousands of alpha particles, On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Mark Jurich <jur...@hotmail.com <mailto:jur...@hotmail.com> > wro

[Vo]:Schrodinger's E-Cat dose?

are offended by my referring to HRM and “iceberg” in the same sentence. From: Mark Jurich [mailto:jur...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:17 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Re: Implied personal radiation dose ? Sorry, Russ ... You’re right. The emoticon went missing

RE: [Vo]:Implied personal radiation dose ?

. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com <mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > wrote: >From the signal pulse, I estimate about 5 micro-Sieverts (uS) per steradian. >So, it depends on how close you were. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Rus

RE: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?

2016 at 3:35 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: Was there some sort of calibration with some known radiation sources performed with the same NaI instrument in the lab setting. Say placing a Coleman lantern mantle, thorium laced, for a rea

RE: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

But surely they cannot replace Vanna White From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 6:59 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs Frank Znidarsic >

RE: [Vo]: Mischegunon polyneutrons at 4.9 Sigma

Hot out of the liquid helium http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.052501. Quad neutrons clusters reliably produced Holy Batman another meaning for Pauli exclusion.

RE: [Vo]:the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:

It seems to me that all the chatter about the 350 day term of Rossi’s test is just so much babble from armchair dilletantes. It is tantamount to trolling. I for one have no end of admiration for Rossi in performing his test so diligently and as openly as he has done. In the face of the nasty

RE: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

What might be a variety of means, low tech to high tech, to detect low energy muons? From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:19 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner The deflation hypothesis of Horace Heffner is

RE: [Vo]:the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:

computer code everywhere. From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 11:47 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re: Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com>

RE: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

ber... On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: What might be a variety of means, low tech to high tech, to detect low energy muons? From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net <mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> ] Sent

[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:​Researcher illegally shares millions of science papers free online to spread knowledge

I surely hope that there are mirrors of that data being created and saved everywhere. Paywalls in science have always been deplorable and have been avariciously supported by the vast majority of the scientific community. Once upon a time that is no longer there were costs associated with

RE: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?

What, if anything, does this new LIGO GW work say about the ideas of Tom VanFlandern whose papers showed the speed of gravity to be e9 times C. Perhaps there is room for more than one kind of gravity wave, much like the P and S waves in seismology. From: Russ George [mailto:russ.geo

[Vo]:EM drive actually a GW drive?

Given what the methods and discovery of LIGO teach is it likely that the EM drive is in fact a GW drive and thus an immediate realization of some utility of GW. If so then Shawyer's 'GW detector' has far outdone LIGO.

RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPP

What, you don’t believe Casimir’s oxen pull? From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 7:18 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:DCE for SPP I don't believe that the vacuum does work. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Eric Walker

[Vo]:Chinese tokamak fusion

I am curious as to the neutron count in the recent Chinese Tokamak test, years ago a GenAtomics tok test produced some e16 neutrons in total for a 'shot' of ~1 second. Did the Chinese see e18 neutrons?

RE: [Vo]:Chinese tokamak fusion

of China are embarrassing lacking in detail. It appears they only used protium, so zero neutrons are expected. From: Russ George I am curious as to the neutron count in the recent Chinese Tokamak test, years ago a GenAtomics tok test produced some e16 neutrons in total for a 'shot' of ~1

RE: [Vo]:Chinese tokamak fusion

tokamak fusion The reports coming out of China are embarrassing lacking in detail. It appears they only used protium, so zero neutrons are expected. From: Russ George I am curious as to the neutron count in the recent Chinese Tokamak test, years ago a GenAtomics tok test produced some e16

RE: [Vo]:New paper from Jiang in Chinese

Ludwik, What's your opinion of Fisher's polyneutrons these days? From: Ludwik Kowalski [mailto:kowals...@mail.montclair.edu] Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 6:38 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:New paper from Jiang in Chinese I suppose that at least one member of the Chinese

RE: [Vo]:New paper from Jiang in Chinese

with new experimental results. Dr Fisher said he will publish a new report, before the end of 2015. But he didn't I hope he is OK. Ludwik == On Feb 29, 2016, at 9:57 PM, Russ George wrote: Ludwik, What's your opinion of Fisher's polyneutrons these days? From: Ludwik

RE: [Vo]:New paper from Jiang in Chinese

not familiar with new experimental results. Dr Fisher said he will publish a new report, before the end of 2015. But he didn't I hope he is OK. Ludwik == On Feb 29, 2016, at 9:57 PM, Russ George wrote: Ludwik, What's your opinion of Fisher's polyneutrons these days? From

RE: [Vo]:New paper from Jiang in Chinese

As a cold fusion experimentalist it is astonishing to see such experiments being done with so few thermocouples. They are incredibly cheap and using many for redundancy purposes is just common sense. It used to be that the data channels were in short supply but these days many data channels is

RE: [Vo]:Events at the end of Jiang's run #2, Fig. 3

It is a telling and sad story on the character of LENR when this Chinese report that shows inadequate experimental design and clearly defective thermocouples with no redundancy is proposed by some as a ‘confirmation’ of lenr. Whether the reported experiment(s) are shoddy or not, the data

RE: [Vo]:RE: An experiment you never heard of

loys'''. However no one has ever carried out circumstantial thermal investigations on this field. But precisely these thermal measurements (change in the temperature of the metal alloys, calorimetry) are crucial in discovery of a new phenomenon "Space Energy". About this demo from Rus

RE: [Vo]: Radon not a likely explanation for GS5.2

and make Geigers has pages and pages of info on catching and examining radon fleas. http://www.aw-el.com Russ From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 7:50 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]: Radon not a likely explanation for GS5.2 Based

RE: [Vo]:Statement from Industrial Heat

It's clear they (IH & Rossi) are not happy with Peter Gluck's (and others) speculative boosterism post(s)/reports on the effectiveness of the e-cat extended mewling test. Rossie and IH are clearly out to monetize whatever tech they have and offering the details to competitors as all of the

RE: [Vo]:Statement from Industrial Heat

...@thornros.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 11:32 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Statement from Industrial Heat I think you are right Russ. However, I do not thing that rumors by 'fans' or negative statements (a la Ahern) has any impact on IH's statements. I read the statement

RE: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

Great vibrations but where you say, “Without physical reaction mass, such a system has its own unique reference frame - from within which, energy may be conserved, but which from without, cannot be.” Might we start using common terminology…. Your description is of course more popularly known

RE: [Vo]: EM Drive(s)

LENR so as to produce a directional thrust. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: Of course what the EM Drive energy mystery suggests is an experiment where an addition inside the EM Drive might be made, a simple

RE: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

“And it is this direct implication that Shayer et al have not yet answered to, so far as I'm aware. The conversion of input energy to acceleration would remain constant, at any velocity. If 1 m/s/kg costs a whopping kJ, it'll ALWAYS cost 1kJ, whether from 0 - 1 m/s or from 999 m/s to 1 km/s,

RE: [Vo]:Re: Bremsstrahlung experimental note

A 1-2 second radiation burst in a detector is the 'norm' for capture of a cosmic ray in lead! -Original Message- From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:05 PM To: vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:Re: Bremsstrahlung experimental note Axil-- Bremsstrahlung

RE: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

such that it provides so little thrust. From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 10:17 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s) On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com>

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:EM Drive(s)

with carrying fuel! -Original Message- From: Russ George [mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 4:40 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:EM Drive(s) Now that there are lenr kits and bits being sold and as well the Orbo's it is time for someone to offer

RE: [Vo]: Bremsstrahlung experimental note

It’s right there for all to see hidden behind the Cheshire Cat’s grin! From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 11:07 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Bremsstrahlung experimental note Can you point out the location of the mouse in Rossi's

RE: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

Here’s a link to a great EM Drive DIY experiment http://www.masinaelectrica.com/emdrive-independent-test/#comment-10348 From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 12:36 PM To:

RE: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

to prove drive force. Why does the experimenter not use some form of shielded on board battery for power? A short duration test might be possible especially if they wish to convince many skeptics. Dave -Original Message- From: Russ George < <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com>

RE: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

nearly breathless in anticipation. From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 11:48 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s) On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com>

RE: [Vo]:Bacteria able to eat plastic bottles discovered by scientists

How about a simple verbal explanation as opposed to movies… few of us open movies posted in the wild on the net, it’s rather like poking at a mangy looking sleeping dog one comes across. From: Frank Znidarsic [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:11 AM To:

RE: [Vo]:Bacteria able to eat plastic bottles discovered by scientists

by scientists In reply to Russ George's message of Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:36:03 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Far better to just start replacing all of the polyethylene with polylacticacid PLA plastic which all bacteria find delicious. All of the worlds PLA plastic needs could be met using a sustainable harv

RE: [Vo]:Bacteria able to eat plastic bottles discovered by scientists

Far better to just start replacing all of the polyethylene with polylacticacid PLA plastic which all bacteria find delicious. All of the worlds PLA plastic needs could be met using a sustainable harvest of a small fraction of the sargassum seaweed that fills the Sargasso Sea! Just take care of

  1   2   3   4   >