Re: [Vo]:New paper from B-J. Huang et al.

Because many thousands of negative pressure are produced within the cavity. On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 22:14, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Huang, B.-J., et al., *Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce > energy and isotope gases.* Scientific Reports, 2024. *14*(1): p. 214. > >

Re: [Vo]:Mr. Bean vs Mr. Musk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_engine On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 00:19, Robin wrote: > In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 8 Jun 2023 19:15:55 -0400: > Hi, > > A fuel cell + electric motor would probably also be more efficient. > >Hi Grimer! > > > >Hydrogen combustion in a gasoline

Re: [Vo]:Mr. Bean vs Mr. Musk

Jun 2023 at 00:16, Terry Blanton wrote: > Hi Grimer! > > Hydrogen combustion in a gasoline engine has a fraction of the horsepower, > not to mention the embrittlement discovered by Bob Lazar when he fueled his > Vette with H2. Poor valves. > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, 7:08 P

Re: [Vo]:Mr. Bean vs Mr. Musk

What about the ICE running on hydrogen generated from electricity. On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 23:08, Terry Blanton wrote: > When we get our energy via fusion, be it natural (Sol) or man made, the > ICE should be melted to make new weapons and plowshares. > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, 5:44 PM MSF wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Very low power levels are worth TONS of money

Thanks Jed. On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 01:40, Jed Rothwell wrote: > I do not recall an experiment that produced a lot of steam. Maybe the glow > discharge ones? They went for 15 minutes before the electrode dissolved. > They did produce a lot of steam. > >>

Re: [Vo]:ICCF24 paper, How to fix global warming with cold fusion

Very inspiring. Well done. On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 22:41, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Here is the first draft of my presentation at ICCF24: > > > Rothwell, J. *How to fix global warming with cold fusion.* in *ICCF24 > Solid-state Energy Summit.* 2022. Mountain View, CA. > > >

Re: [Vo]:Very low power levels are worth TONS of money

reaction. Maybe I dreamt it. :-) On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 21:23, Terry Blanton wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 10:11 AM Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I can't remember where I read that Mizuno had demonstrated a specimen in >> a water bath which generat

Re: [Vo]:Very low power levels are worth TONS of money

I can't remember where I read that Mizuno had demonstrated a specimen in a water bath which generated impossible amounts of steam. Can anyone provide a link to that experiment please? On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 14:16, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jonathan Berry wrote: > > Wrist watches of course don't

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

This sounds like an example of the whirling of shafts "Whirling of shafts occurs due to *rotational imbalance of a shaft*, even in the absence of external loads, which causes resonance to occur at certain speeds, known as critical speeds." Large electricity generating turbines have to be taken

Re: [Vo]:Test

alled the Brachistochrome Problem > > https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Brac > > Jones > > > Frank Grimer wrote: > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSv_IlXmBg > > Two cars. > > Green low road car arrives first. > > Real or Fake. > > Please explain your choice. > > > >

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

> > I would be more inclined to say that electrons are eddies, rather than > whole atoms. I think of the other particles in > the zoo as composite eddies. (Wheels within wheels as it were.) With a quasi solid core where the speed of rotation exceeds the information transmission speed of the

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

Thanks for your reply. Robin (my favorite garden bird :-)). A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the center of a vast collection of stars called

Re: [Vo]:Test

ectation > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvlmdPLMQM4 > > The more general phenomenon seems to be called the Brachistochrome Problem > > https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Brac > > Jones > > > Frank Grimer wrote: > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSv_IlXmBg > > Two cars. > > Green low road car arrives first. > > Real or Fake. > > Please explain your choice. > > > >

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

> > why do like charges repel, and unlike charges attract? Because one is a source, the other is a sink at the bottom of a deep ocean. Unlike charges have a Bernoulli flow between them. One is a source - the other is a sink This leads to their apparent attraction. In reality they are being

Re: [Vo]:Test

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSv_IlXmBg Two cars. Green low road car arrives first. Real or Fake. Please explain your choice. On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 07:55, Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

[Vo]:Test

[Vo]:Test of heading

Test of text

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

1747 words - in the middle of the night. One can't help but applaud your enthusiasm, Vibrator. On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 01:04, Vibrator ! wrote: > I didn't put any on tick tok. > > I didn't 'put' any anywhere. > > Again, every day for the last few weeks i've come home from work and > checked

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

I did look at some, not all, of the ones you put on tick tock. As for this one - blue skies - flashing like a semaphore - ergo - a firelantern with reflecting panels tumbling around in the wind. Not rocket science is it. On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 11:13, Vibrator ! wrote: > > If you want to

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

, flying freely in all skies, everywhere.. >> there's other consistent types of UFO and locales etc., but this is a >> consistent thing unto itself, and seemingly more common that all >> 'traditional' UFO types (saucers, cigars etc.) combined. They're all but >> ubiquito

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

Chinese fire lanterns. Which explains why they are seen all around the world. It wouldn't surprise me if you even have a small Chinese community in W3. On Sat, 2 Jul 2022 at 01:59, Vibrator ! wrote: > If you check the 'box-orbs' list, i now have at least two that clearly > show tethered pairs:

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

I'm not sure how to start a new thread in Vortex-l but since this most concerns you Jed I'm posting to you in this thread. In your book on Mizuno (which I seem to have mislaid - probably lent it to someone who didn't return it) you describe at experiment with specimen of finely divided metal

Re: [Vo]:Cavitation (sonofusion) reactor from B-J. Huang et al.

a catastrophe such as failure of a prestressed concrete AGR pressure vessel is needed to provide the necessary *Gestalt* switch. However, as AGRs are now being decommissioned this possibility is slowly disappearing. On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 00:37, Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: [Vo]:What would it take?

This is the kind of toy that is needed. People have made attempts to emulate but as yet no one has succeeded. They need to try harder. I believe it worked. > "Bruce Welsh is an electronics engineer with* the o*pen spirit which has > been devoted to alternative energies for twenty years. It is

Re: [Vo]:What would it take?

A Bessler Wheel in the form of a toy. Interestingly, Laithwaite came close to solving this with his gyro demonstration at the RI. May the strain be with you. On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 23:00, Jonathan Berry wrote: > Interesting idea. > > And while I don't think there are many things that could be

Re: [Vo]:Cavitation (sonofusion) reactor from B-J. Huang et al.

A good example of harnessing the power of the Beta-atmosphere. They will cotton on eventually. :-) On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 22:30, Jed Rothwell wrote: > This discussion group began long ago with discussions of vortex-induced > cavitation, also known as sonofusion. Examples include the work of

Re: [Vo]:the uninhibited mind

IT'S TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN          On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 at 14:15, Don wrote: > > > "When we understand the structure of matter then we may devise > confirmatory experiments using whatever instrumentation we please, but > until that understanding is attained, the proper tool is the

Re: Aha, there's a video Re: [Vo]:FE device quietly published

No surprise to me. As I've shown. It makes more sense to view concrete, etc., and held together from without by Beta-atmosphere pressure - and not from within by inconceivable tensions. It's very annoying to be born before one's time. Let's hope he pulls his finger out and builds a large scale

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

By removing the oscillation he removed the very thing that was causing the Steorn effect I seem to remember. On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 19:52, Terry Blanton wrote: > We called it the "Little Effect". Devices never worked around Scott > Little (or his daughter?) > > Kinda the opposite of the

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

I wouldn't worry too much about Puthoff Puthoff took an interest in the Church of Scientology in the late 1960s and reached what was then the top OT VII level by 1971.[3]

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

like 1.25 or so. > > Which is to say that there is some real gain (overunity) - but not much. > > Does you beta atmosphere theory address this point? > > Jones > > > Frank Grimer wrote: > > > https://remontideas.ru/en/warm-floor/vechnyi-dvigatel-potapova-generator-svobodnoi-energii-s-samozapitkoi.html > > A bit of history. >

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

https://remontideas.ru/en/warm-floor/vechnyi-dvigatel-potapova-generator-svobodnoi-energii-s-samozapitkoi.html A bit of history. On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 14:16, Jones Beene wrote: > David Jonsson wrote: > > > Hi > > The concept vortex seems to be used in different ways. > > How is it used on this

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

A good example of getting energy from the Beta-atmosphere. Beene knows what I'm talking about. https://assets.markallengroup.com//article-images/1085/f-hydro.htm "Hydro Sonic’s unit has been the subject of three tests by a leading US technical university. The university apparently demonstrated a

Re: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month

They are taking the piss. :-) On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 23:59, Robin wrote: > In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 20 May 2021 18:53:24 -0400: > Hi Terry, > [snip] > >I hope you are right; however, my research tells me that they are taking > >something from us. And I really don't think

Re: [Vo]:Verification of Mizuno experiment

I'm not surprised he is being successful. If I'd been him I would have let the experiment (he describes in his book) that was running away continue and blow up the lab. It would have been confirmation of the P experiment where they blew a hole in the lab bench.  On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 23:13,

Re: [Vo]:Verification of Mizuno experiment

I'm not surprised he is being successful. If I'd been him I would have let the experiment (he describes in his book) that was running away continue and blow up the lab. It would have been confirmation of the P experiment where they blew a hole in the lab bench.  On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 23:13,

Re: [Vo]:Re: CONCEPTS OF TIME--

I like it. Makes sense to me.  On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 23:27, Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > Good to know some more physicists start to think about time. One of them > cited I did know personally. > > The real problem is the missing education in computation theory. I did > spend 2 net years working

Re: [Vo]:Corona Virus

I watched it to the end and found it most interesting. Thanks Ron. On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 17:02, Ron Wormus wrote: > I don't have anything but the link. I think it is worth taking the time to > listen to it. Michael Osterholm is a expert who has thought a lot about > this situation. > > > >

Re: [Vo]:Magic Roundabout

Ride carefully.  On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 06:58, Vibrator ! wrote: > " a 50% accumulator? So 2-cycs to unity, 3 to 133%." > > eek i meant "3 to 150%", duh, need slepp.. > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 6:55 AM Vibrator ! wrote: > >> ..on 2nd thoughts, isn't it a 50% accumulator? So 2-cycs to unity,

Re: [Vo]:Math Scholar paper on LENR

Yes, fusion requires enormous temperatures at ambient pressure. not if the pressure is reduced by orders of pF magnitude. However, until it is recognised that there is no such thing as an attractive force and all materials are held together from without and not from within, held together by a

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

On my 80th birth my children has some packs of cards made with the pictures of my 54 grandchildren. I don't bother to keep track of the number of great grandchildren because it keeps changing.  The 88 relates to Rommel's anti-aircraft gun. which was so effective in the western desert.

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

: > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 7:06 AM Vibrator ! wrote: > >> >> >> Sorry to bump my own thread, bad form.. >> > > Some suggestions: > > Look up Frank Grimer. He hangs out at the Besseler Wheel forum: > https://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/ and will be delight

Re: [Vo]:Old news: Conversion of hydrogen into helium in palladium

How interesting. One wonders what prompted them to look for helium in the first place. Was it ordinary hydrogen or heavy hydrogen? On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 15:28, Nigel Dyer wrote: > While looking for an article in a a copy of Nature from 1926 (as you do) I > came across the following article

Re: [Vo]:The potential weaponization of LENR

I seem to remember something about a quarter inch cube of palladium blowing a hole in a lab bench. What would a one inch cube have done! On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 05:15, Terry Blanton wrote: > There have been at least two deaths which could be attributed to CF > experiments, one at SRI in 1992

Re: [Vo]:The potential weaponization of LENR

Very interesting. People have got it the wrong way around though. Its not because the positive pressure has gone up. It is because the negative pressure has gone up, the pF has gone up. This relates to the first paper I published on the strength of clay-cements and how it is affected by the

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

No, no, no. On 1 June 2018 at 21:15, Terry Blanton wrote: > Grimes, Damn autocorrect. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 4:12 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > >> Crimes? >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 4:11 PM Terry Blanton wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 1:42 PM Vibrator ! wrote: >>> @Chris -

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR?

I think they are cavitation pits where the high pF inside cavitation bubbles has "sucked" the plastic out. On 26 September 2017 at 18:56, Alan Fletcher wrote: > > Not an expert in either .. but a lot of those look more like dendritic > crystal growth than particle tracks. >

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR?

This doesn't surprise me. With cavitation you are getting negative pressures up to pF6. Think Hutchison effect and Dr Judy Woods dustification. On 25 September 2017 at 22:25, Axil Axil wrote: > https://steemit.com/science/@mfmp/ecco-macro-photography- >

Re: [Vo]:Li batteries

Thanks for that. Most interesting. Especially the video contrasting the effect of brutality on the liquid lithium and the solid lithium batteries. :-) On 14 February 2017 at 07:41, Axil Axil wrote: > http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/tech/new-damage-proof- >

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

"Jones Beene must be a lawyer..." He was - and possibly still is. ;-) On 4 June 2016 at 05:06, Axil Axil wrote: > Jones Beene: "Their opinions are* de minimis..." * > > Jones Beene must be a lawyer of at least work with them alot. > > My lawyer oftentimes describes