Re: [Vo]:Holmlid paper retraction

2019-02-24 Thread Jones Beene
BTW - George Miley is a name well-known to LENR researchers. Over two decades ago, Miley developed a commercial fusor (Farnsworth Fusor) which "warm fusion" design was was later sold to Daimler Aerospace. This product was not suitable for well-logging - due to size constraint of fitting in a

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid paper retraction

2019-02-23 Thread Jones Beene
The retraction by the Plos editor is regrettable, even stupid. We can only wait to see if it will be an total embarrassment for them. In the end, the burden of proof is going to be met with a commercial product, or not at all. Based on everything in the record, we could see something like a

RE: [Vo]:Holmlid paper retraction

2019-02-23 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
ary 23, 2019 1:40:55 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid paper retraction Retraction opposed by me Posted by lholmlid on 23 Feb 2019 at 14:24 GMT The action by Plos One on my paper which was retracted by the journal on 19-02-23 is astonishing. The retraction procedure did not involve a scie

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid paper retraction

2019-02-23 Thread Axil Axil
Retraction opposed by mePosted by lholmlid on *23 Feb 2019 at 14:24 GMT* The action by Plos One on my paper which was retracted by the journal on 19-02-23 is astonishing. The retraction procedure did not involve a scientific evaluation. I have informed the journal that the experimental results on

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid paper retraction

2019-02-23 Thread Axil Axil
"baryon number conservation" does not apply in proton decay which in simple terms is what Holmlid is producing through the action of ultra dense hydrogen. Generally, in one of the major activities in LENR, there is charge-parity non-conservation ("CP violation")