Dave Roberson asks:
“What happens to the energetic gammas that are generated by the transitions
between states? They seem to gloss over that detail and talk about some
unusual mechanism that converts them into infrared radiation. It would be an
incredible coincidence for all of these gammas t
Thanks, I knew I could count on the vortex!
-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Oct 30, 2011 10:54 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Is the ECAT out of the bag?
>David Roberson wrote:
>I recall an old phrase attributed to Sherlock Holmes along the li
>David Roberson wrote:
>I recall an old phrase attributed to Sherlock Holmes along the lines of
"Once all of the probable answers have been proven wrong, >then it must be
the improbable". Someone among the vortex will correct my phrase and that
is a good thing. My wording is >incorrect, but that
“Dr. Ed Storms, in his book, makes a good point that any theory of the
mechanism should explain all of the experimental evidence, not just a
convenient subset.”
Why does deuterium kill the Rossi Reaction (Ni-H)?
Why is high hydrogen pressure required to maintain the Ni-H reaction?
Why is a
What happens to the energetic gammas that are generated by the transitions
between states?
Good question Dave. That's why I had it with the Casimer geometries, the
shrunken atom, and Widom and Larsen. I have my own ideas about this
downshifting (following the lead of David Noever) and t
very well.
If this hurdle can be surmounted, I vote for W & L.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Higgins Bob-CBH003
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Oct 30, 2011 9:46 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Is the ECAT out of the bag?
And let us not forget Occam’s razor. Dr. Ed Storms, in his book, makes a
How would that explain the absence of radioactive elements of random half
life times?
2011/10/30 Higgins Bob-CBH003
> And let us not forget Occam’s razor. Dr. Ed Storms, in his book, makes
> a good point that any theory of the mechanism should explain all of the
> experimental evidence, not ju
And let us not forget Occam’s razor. Dr. Ed Storms, in his book, makes a good
point that any theory of the mechanism should explain all of the experimental
evidence, not just a convenient subset. It seems to me (Occam’s razor) that
there is only one truly new phenomenon taking place in this co
much simpler.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sat, Oct 29, 2011 10:07 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Is the ECAT out of the bag?
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:10:37 -0400 (EDT):
i David,
snip]
suggest you take a look at
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:10:37 -0400 (EDT):
Hi David,
[snip]
I suggest you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betavoltaics
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
I recall an old phrase attributed to Sherlock Holmes along the lines of “Once
all of the probable answers have been proven wrong, then it must be the
improbable”. Someone among the vortex will correct my phrase and that is a
good thing. My wording is incorrect, but that is not the important i
11 matches
Mail list logo
