I have an intuitive feeling - totally unsubstantiated - that the law of
energy conservation is to energy, what Newton's laws were to mechanics (or
physics in general).
I mean you can take a pound of any explosive and explain that the energy
from that explosive is a direct (measurable) result o
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:00:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Because it doesn't. It's a magnetic motor -- permanent-magnet-based
engine -- and there's no mechanism for it to "steal heat" from the
environment, nor any evidence whatsoev
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:00:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Because it doesn't. It's a magnetic motor -- permanent-magnet-based
>engine -- and there's no mechanism for it to "steal heat" from the
>environment, nor any evidence whatsoever that it does so.
>
>It's ty
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
If the scientific jury challenge had no takers, they would have >build a Steorn
car and paraded it around.
( I think that you could have taken several "scientists" we all >know and
driven them around in it for months without
refueling and they'd still deny that it
meter (although it can
be done too).
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Steorn question
> Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
> > ( I think that you could have taken several
> "
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
> ( I think that you could have taken several
"scientists" we all know and
> driven them around in it for months without
> refueling and they'd still deny that it worked! ).
I'd become a Steorn believer if the device cut the
electric bills by at least half! That
sh
still deny that it worked! ).
-Original Message-
From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 3:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Steorn question
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
>
>do you have any ideas using a heat engine or refrigeration
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
do you have any ideas using a heat engine or refrigeration plant and heat
engine to drive a Steorn Absorber?
If I had a F E machine, I'd build a small one and package it as a
battery charger. Put a discharged battery in, spin the flywheel and some
time later repla
If you wade thru the thousands of posts in the steorn forum, it's obvious
that Sean McCarthy is trying to
provide much of the information necessary to build his device without
compromising his patent applications.
There are even summaries of what he's said.
It's 7.5 watts/gram
It's 0.5 watts/cm^
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> If, instead of an LED, you put a normal diode in
parallel with
> a resistor, the diode should get warmer and the
resistor
> cooler, as noise from the resistor is rectified and
the
> electrons give up the 0.6 volts of junction energy
when they
> fall down across the
Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
[ snip bits on Steorn ]
>
> > > > It's type-1 perpetual motion: violation of he
> > > > first law, which is conservation of energy. If
> > > > the Steorn otor works, then a Steorn motor
> > > > operating in a closed nvironment will warm up
> > > > that environ
Hi,
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> Paul wrote:
> > Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> Why aren't people more clear about the
steorn motor and say that
> > >> it gets colder as it creates mechanical
power?
> > >
> > > Because it doesn't. It's a
Paul wrote:
> Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Why aren't people more clear about the steorn motor and say that
> >> it gets colder as it creates mechanical power?
> >
> > Because it doesn't. It's a magnetic motor --
> > permanent-magnet-based engine -- and the
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Why aren't people more clear about the steorn
motor and say that it
>> gets colder as it creates mechanical power?
>
> Because it doesn't. It's a magnetic motor --
permanent-magnet-based
> engine -- and there's no mechanism for it to "
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why aren't people more clear about the steorn motor
and say that it gets
> colder as it creates mechanical power? Then the
motor would be a type of
> Ambient Heat Recycling machine which is
revolutionary but possible.
> Diode array can compete with them.
Steorn clai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why aren't people more clear about the steorn motor and say that it gets
colder as it creates mechanical power?
Because it doesn't. It's a magnetic motor -- permanent-magnet-based
engine -- and there's no mechanism for it to "steal heat" from the
environment, nor a
is going to say."
If the whole thing is a marketing stunt it's an excellent one. If it's a
scam... it's an excellent one too :)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:16 PM
Subject:
www.steorn.net
On 1/16/07, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
>As luck may have it, the Steorn motor runs in reverse absorbing energy without
getting hot -- 7.5 watts per gram of the motor. Problem solved.
>
Did I mention that Steorn is licensing their technolo
Because it doesn't.
On 1/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why aren't people more clear about the steorn motor and
say that it gets colder as it creates mechanical power?
Then the motor would be a type of Ambient Heat Recycling
machine which is revolutionary but possible. Diod
Why aren't people more clear about the steorn motor and
say that it gets colder as it creates mechanical power?
Then the motor would be a type of Ambient Heat Recycling
machine which is revolutionary but possible. Diode array
can compete with them.
Reference:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:46:05 +020
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BTJFPSBEA
does this shed any light to the matter
On 16/01/07, Esa Ruoho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://steorn.com/en/news.aspx?p=2&id=981
youtube and googlevideo do have quite a bit of steorn material on their
archives.
On 16/01/07, thomas malloy <[EMAIL P
http://steorn.com/en/news.aspx?p=2&id=981
youtube and googlevideo do have quite a bit of steorn material on their
archives.
On 16/01/07, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
>As luck may have it, the Steorn motor runs in reverse absorbing energy
without getting h
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
As luck may have it, the Steorn motor runs in reverse absorbing energy without
getting hot -- 7.5 watts per gram of the motor. Problem solved.
Did I mention that Steorn is licensing their technology? The question
is, do they have anything to license? Do you have a U
23 matches
Mail list logo