I guess that makes comments like this one:
It is a little unusual to see someone viciously attack himself. even more
meta-bizarre...
complex crew around here... guess its gonna take me some time to learn the
ropes...
;)
hope we can also manage to reverse engineer these hot felines along the way.
Wouldn't any pussy (cat) on this list be named Schrödinger? :)
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:21 AM, .:.gotjosh ene...@begreen.nu wrote:
snip
hope we can also manage to reverse engineer these hot felines along the
way.
It might talk a bit longer. They don't actually *have* and ECat yet.
I would be surprised if they get one any time soon.
I concur.
Erik Furberg
April 17th, 2011 at 7:19
AMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473cpage=3#comment-33439
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Its nice to hear that you will
Its really entertaining and all, but do you two really have to pollute every
single thread with this stuff? are you twin brothers from a former life who
just bicker constantly as a way of showing love?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:25, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jones Beene
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:49 AM, .:.gotjosh ene...@begreen.nu wrote:
Its really entertaining and all, but do you two really have to pollute every
single thread with this stuff? are you twin brothers from a former life who
just bicker constantly as a way of showing love?
Being a newcomer, you
From gotjosh:
Its really entertaining and all, but do you two really have to
pollute every single thread with this stuff? are you twin brothers
from a former life who just bicker constantly as a way of
showing love?
Adding to Terry's Kommentary Jones and Rothwell have been known to
spar with
So Rossi has gone from:
50 modules of 20 kW each
130 10 kW units
300 3 kW each
or more poetically stated, from bobcat, to tom-cat, to kitty-cat! :-)
So Steven Vincent Johnson's comment may prove insightful:
However, there is a
Mark - For future reference - when did he mention 50 reactors at 20 kW ?
Moving on. Awkshully, and in complete candor - as for the rest of it - this
appears to be consistent with what we would expect from the same identical
reactor as in the Jan demo, but with a present realization (or
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]: shrinking felines
Mark - For future reference - when did he mention 50 reactors at 20 kW ?
Moving on. Awkshully, and in complete candor - as for the rest of it - this
appears to be consistent
with what we would expect from the same identical reactor
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Again – before the flood of denials, character assassination and finger
pointing – let’s wait a couple of days for the Swedish results, please.
It might talk a bit longer. They don't actually *have* and ECat yet.
I would
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Still great but at a level which is consistent of my predicted COP in the
Swedish testing of COP of 10.
Get your story straight! Your prediction was at least 1000:1 not 10. Right
here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg45088.html
11 matches
Mail list logo
